Keivan Eghbali; Sattar Azizi
Abstract
The right to development is an approach to development of human societies in which human rights are considered and economic development approach fundamentally integrates within the human rights approach to development. Achieving to this in any society requires that status of those groups that seems to ...
Read More
The right to development is an approach to development of human societies in which human rights are considered and economic development approach fundamentally integrates within the human rights approach to development. Achieving to this in any society requires that status of those groups that seems to be under discrimination, including women, is considered. In this regard, it seems that one of the most effective solutions is to provide the possibility of Equal and perfect participation of women in all levels of decision-making related to various political, economic, social and cultural development of the society. The solution that in the present study will be evaluated by descriptive-analytical method. By realization of women's Equal and perfect public participation, they can participate in decision-making of the society about various aspects of development that make an opportunity for attention to demands of women in these decisions. As the result, the way to ensure attention to women's needs and human rights in the development process will be prepared, the path that will ultimately lead to the realization of women's right to development, which means a guided development for women's enjoyment from achievements of development and their access to the human rights
Sattar Azizi; Zahra Ghadbeygi
Abstract
The proliferation of Coronavirus around the world and the need to maintain the health of individuals in society have forced many governments to impose restrictions on citizens' rights by imposing social distances, quarantine and closure of educational, economic and sports centers. One important action ...
Read More
The proliferation of Coronavirus around the world and the need to maintain the health of individuals in society have forced many governments to impose restrictions on citizens' rights by imposing social distances, quarantine and closure of educational, economic and sports centers. One important action of governments in combating the spread of coronavirus is the digital tracking of people infected by coronavirus in some countries. This article seeks to answer the following questions. First of all, due to application of this policy in which aspect or aspects of protection of privacy can the states intervene? Second, given that the imposition of restrictions must be done where necessary, the question arises as to whether the restrictions imposed as a result of the digital tracking of people infected or suspected of having the corona virus and its transmission to other members of the community were commensurate with the need to maintain the health of members of the community. An examination of the various measures taken in countries around the world shows that the restrictions imposed on privacy can be justified by simultaneously respecting the health of the citizens of the community as well as the provisions of international human rights law.
sattar azizi; Mohsen Akbari
Abstract
Military force of Turkey and Turkey-backed Syrian forces attacked Northeastern Syria on 9 October 2019. The concept of "safe zone" has been used in different terms in International Humanitarian Law. In this article, the legal status of the formation of a safe zone on Syria's Northern borders with Turkey ...
Read More
Military force of Turkey and Turkey-backed Syrian forces attacked Northeastern Syria on 9 October 2019. The concept of "safe zone" has been used in different terms in International Humanitarian Law. In this article, the legal status of the formation of a safe zone on Syria's Northern borders with Turkey is examined in the light of international law. The main question of this study is that under what conditions, the safe zone is acceptable in international law. Given the fact that the Syrian central government was opposed to the Turkish military invasion and the creation of the zone, and that there was even military conflict between the parties, and regarding the lack of authorization of the Security Council to establish a safe zone in Syria, Turkish military invasion and establishing such a safe zone was contrary to Article 4(2) of the United Nations Charter. On the other hand, Turkey's attempt to resettle Syrian refugees in the claimed safe zone, displaced from other parts of Syria, is being done to the detriment of the Kurdish population of Northeast Syria, and is in violation of international human rights and International criminal law.
sattar azizi; Siamak Karimi
Abstract
The Arab coalition’s military intervention in Yemen crisis (2015) which is led by Saudi Arabia can be studied through different aspects in the international law’s system. The secondary rules of international law which decide the breach of primary rules of international law and their consequences, ...
Read More
The Arab coalition’s military intervention in Yemen crisis (2015) which is led by Saudi Arabia can be studied through different aspects in the international law’s system. The secondary rules of international law which decide the breach of primary rules of international law and their consequences, is one of these aspects. Principally, each state is responsible for its own wrong doings, but in some cases, other considerations and necessities such as rule of law and reparation of injured party, requires a state to be held responsible regarding another state’s wrongful act. One of these cases is derived international responsibility which results from aiding or assisting another state which commits an international wrongful act. The use of cluster munitions by Saudi against positions in Yemen and armed this state with these munitions by third state/states could be examined in the light of the derived international responsibility. Using the principles of this type of responsibility, this article tries to resolve whether the third party state/states that have armed Saudi Arabia with cluster munitions, have responsibility in Saudis' usage of cluster weapons.
