vahid salehi; Mohammad Hashemi; S.Ghasem Zamani
Abstract
The principle of the legal security is one of the important principles of the public law and the criteria of the rule of law.This principle which has been introduced from domestic law into international law is contains a range of guarantees and protections related to the right of fundamental human freedoms.Following ...
Read More
The principle of the legal security is one of the important principles of the public law and the criteria of the rule of law.This principle which has been introduced from domestic law into international law is contains a range of guarantees and protections related to the right of fundamental human freedoms.Following the outbreak of domestic and international armed conflict in the 1990s in the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda, The UN Security Council called for an end to violence and the establishment of peace, security and justice in those territories and in the international arena, established ICTY& ICTR .The most important religious and protective aspect of legal security in the statutes and rules and regulations related to the mentioned courts is clearly evident in the forms of principles guaranteeing the quality of laws and principles protecting individual rights.How these courts play a role in establishing legal security is main issue of the present study. examining this principle and its criteria and analyzing the decisions and rulings of the mentioned courts in applying the sub- principles resulting from the category of legal security ,indicates the prominent role of these international judicial institutions in strengthening, developing and establishing the principle of legal security.
S.Ghasem Zamani; hoda Shakib manesh
Abstract
Legitimate expectations protect the negotiated tariff concessions from being adversely modified. The principle of legitimate expectations considered as a ‘well-established’ principle specific to WTO is implicitly stated in Article III of General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). It is ...
Read More
Legitimate expectations protect the negotiated tariff concessions from being adversely modified. The principle of legitimate expectations considered as a ‘well-established’ principle specific to WTO is implicitly stated in Article III of General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). It is also explicitly codified in paragraph 3 of Article XVII of General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) which considers the modification of conditions of competition as a violation of the non-discrimination obligation.
The dispute settlement body in the WTO recognizes the legitimate expectations as a “conditions of competition” where foreign markets trust domestic markets based on the negotiated tariff concessions.
So, any actions inconsistent with the overall level of negotiated commitments which have not become enforceable and predictable may constitute the violation of legitimate expectations. In conclusion, the principle of good faith is a tool to accommodate under the protection of legitimate expectations that “impaired benefits” could be claimed under a non-violation type complaint. Furthermore, this article demonstrates how the principle of legitimate expectations, in addition to protecting tariff consolidation, works effectively to fill the void and guarantee competitive opportunities.
S.Ghasem Zamani; behnaz ahmadvand
Abstract
Incredible development in communications, especially in the last two decades, has changed the entire worlds communications system. The main accessibility to new information system by advanced technology and huge investments in this field shows a new description of power and its balance in the present ...
Read More
Incredible development in communications, especially in the last two decades, has changed the entire worlds communications system. The main accessibility to new information system by advanced technology and huge investments in this field shows a new description of power and its balance in the present world. Therefore, the relationship between government and mass media, in different legal systems, in three stages of policy making, legislation and regulation plays a big and effective role in this regard. It has to be said that audiovisual communications have not been subject to the same legal systems governing the rest of the media, and in all of the political regimes in the world, government interventions in this sector have always been more intense. This article is an attempt to localize and recognize the obstacles to establish the desirable satellite television model in Iranian legal system by introducing the American model in the field of satellite communications, as the desirable model in the world.
Valiollah Noori; Seyed Ghasem Zamani
Abstract
In the past, most armed conflicts were international, but today armed conflicts often are non-international and internal conflicts. However most of international armed conflicts rules are about international armed conflicts and some of them regulate non-international conflicts. Applicability of some ...
Read More
In the past, most armed conflicts were international, but today armed conflicts often are non-international and internal conflicts. However most of international armed conflicts rules are about international armed conflicts and some of them regulate non-international conflicts. Applicability of some of international humanitarian law rules to this kind of conflicts is doubtful. One of these rules is the principle of proportionality.
This principle means that incidental and consequential damages resulting from an attack against civilians or civilian objects should not exceed the direct military advantage expected of the attack. 1977 Additional Protocol II to the 1949 Geneva Conventions which deals with the rules governing non-international conflicts has not referred to this principle. However, in accordance with what is discussed in this paper, the principle of proportionality is applicable to these conflicts.
seyed ghasem zamani
Abstract
Religious freedom is one of the most fundamental human rights which has been embodied and recognized in essential universal and regional human rights instruments, including universal declaration on human rights, international convent on civil and political rights, European convention on human rights, ...
Read More
Religious freedom is one of the most fundamental human rights which has been embodied and recognized in essential universal and regional human rights instruments, including universal declaration on human rights, international convent on civil and political rights, European convention on human rights, American convention on human rights, African charter on human and people rights and Islamic declaration on human rights. Most of these instruments provide that Freedom of religion may be subject to conditions and restrictions such as national security, public safety and protection of health or morals. European Court of Human Rights, as a judicial body of European convention, in its jurisprudence determinate the scope of margin of appreciation. In this article, margin of appreciation and States maneuver in interpretation and implementation of religious freedom were analyzed in light of the jurisprudence of European Court of Human Rights
S.Ghasem Zamani
Abstract
Convergence and divergence of Individual criminal responsibility and international responsibility of States for wrongful acts:Taking a Look at Iran- Iraq War Case (1980)Abstract:On September 22, 1980, Iraq launched an invasion against Iran. The Iraqi army, trained and influenced by Soviet advisors, had ...
Read More
Convergence and divergence of Individual criminal responsibility and international responsibility of States for wrongful acts:Taking a Look at Iran- Iraq War Case (1980)Abstract:On September 22, 1980, Iraq launched an invasion against Iran. The Iraqi army, trained and influenced by Soviet advisors, had organic chemical warfare units and a wide variety of chemical materials and delivery systems. The continuous use of chemical weapons by Iraq against Iran during the war was indeed in violation of Iraq's obligations under 1952 Geneva Convention Protocol and also the principals of international humanitarian law. However taking a look at Iran-Iraq war demonstrates that two aspects of responsibility in this case could be distinguished. While the perpetrators of war crimes are responsible for the acts in their individual capacity, the State is also responsible for its international wrongful acts. In this article the different aspects of the case will be examined in theory and practice. Keywords:Iran-Iraq war, international responsibility of state, individual criminal responsibility, chemical weapons, war crimes
Rahmatollah Farokhi; Mohammad Hossein Ramazani Ghavam Abadi; Seyd Ghasem Zamani
Abstract
European Court of Justice (ECJ) is the judicial body of the European Union (EU). Since its founding in 1952, ECJ has always played a prominent role in the development of the EU law. What has been studied in this article is the role of ECJ in transition of the EU law from duality (between national law ...
Read More
European Court of Justice (ECJ) is the judicial body of the European Union (EU). Since its founding in 1952, ECJ has always played a prominent role in the development of the EU law. What has been studied in this article is the role of ECJ in transition of the EU law from duality (between national law of member states and EU law) to legal monism with the superiority of EU law. In implementation of its effective role, the ECJ has utilized different instruments such as Interpretation of EU law under the preliminary rulings, addressing the infringements of the EU law, recognizing the general principles of law in the form of case law, and also the principle of proportionality of regulations and domestic politics to promote the position of EU law in relation to municipal law of member states. This research partly reveals the process of EU legal integration, through the study of the ECJ case law
seyd ghasem Zamani; Ali Navari
Volume 16, Issue 46 , September 2015, , Pages 9-37
Abstract
The overwhelming view concerning the unilateral secession under contemporary international law is that, in international law, there is no rule in regard to secession. some international lawyers concentrate upon the principle of respect to territorial integrity of independence and sovereign states and ...
Read More
The overwhelming view concerning the unilateral secession under contemporary international law is that, in international law, there is no rule in regard to secession. some international lawyers concentrate upon the principle of respect to territorial integrity of independence and sovereign states and maintain that unilateral secession is unlawful. Meanwhile a moderate and relatively new approach has been proposed by some international lawyers so called “Remedial Secession Doctrine” that according to it, although international law supports territorial integrity of independence and sovereign states in international community, in special circumstances, a state cannot rely on its territorial integrity. The principle of Self-Determination of peoples prevails over Territorial Integrity and so, secession of a part of territory of a state by a people comprising a part of the population of the territory would be possible. Basis and foundation of such argument is relies on inverted reading of the “safeguard clause” embodied in the United Nations General Assembly resolution 2625 that repeated in 1993 Vienna declaration and program of action. this characterize the existence of the Right to Remedial Secession in National and Regional Judicial Decisions.
seyd ghasem zamani; mona sadat mirzadeh
Volume 16, Issue 43 , February 2015, , Pages 81-108
Abstract
Attribution of private-person’s act to a state is accepted in international law insome exceptional matters. Acting under the direction or control of the state is oneof those exceptional cases; by proving state control over private persons andentities, their actions are attributable to the state. ...
Read More
Attribution of private-person’s act to a state is accepted in international law insome exceptional matters. Acting under the direction or control of the state is oneof those exceptional cases; by proving state control over private persons andentities, their actions are attributable to the state. However for understanding therequired level of the control and direction, we shall review and inquiry the judicialjurisprudence in order to make these theoretical concepts more tangible. Iran-U.Sclaims tribunal, as the most prominent international arbitration, has separatedjurisdiction and the merit phase in some of its cases.From jurisdictional point ofview, the tribunal has applied a looser standard while in the merit, tribunal’sapproach has more affinity for theory of effective control. In such cases, as ageneral rule,stateshave notbeenliable for the conduct of non-state actors unlessthe tribunal could find the conduct in question intensely controlled by the state.Indeed the tribunal, in place of determining standard of control in these kinds ofcases, has not lowered the threshold for imputing private acts to statesbut treatedwith it in an exceptional manner. The purpose of present article is to examinestandard of direction and control, while the focus is on the jurisprudence of Iran-U.S claims tribunal.
Seyed Ghasem Zamani
Volume 15, Issue 40 , September 2013, , Pages 115-140
Abstract
There are instances in Municipal jurisdictions where Corporate legalprotections -generally granted as a result of their legal entity- isabrogated, thus empowering third parties to file claims directly againstindividuals responsible for corporate’s conducts. Similarly in InternationalLaw there are ...
Read More
There are instances in Municipal jurisdictions where Corporate legalprotections -generally granted as a result of their legal entity- isabrogated, thus empowering third parties to file claims directly againstindividuals responsible for corporate’s conducts. Similarly in InternationalLaw there are circumstances in which Corporate’s protections are liftedand International responsibility of states may arise as a result of actionstaken by private companies national to it. In such instances, there must beproof of indications that the private company in question has beenexercising sovereign power, has been superintended by the stategovernment and/or has followed its orders. Even so , where the aboverequirements are not so present altogether, state responsibility for privatecompanies conducts may still be envisaged as result of states responsibilityto protect human rights.
sayed ghasem zamani
Volume 8, Issue 19 , December 2006, , Pages 25-41
