Mohammad Hossein Zarei; Ayyam Kamarkhani
Abstract
The State in the general sense is competent to make binding decisions to protect the public interest, on behalf of the people in response to the events of social life. One of the issues that governments have responded in the last two centuries in various forms such as lawmaking, adoptions of economic ...
Read More
The State in the general sense is competent to make binding decisions to protect the public interest, on behalf of the people in response to the events of social life. One of the issues that governments have responded in the last two centuries in various forms such as lawmaking, adoptions of economic policies and the issuance of judicial rulings has been economic crises. Given the impact of judicial rulings on resource allocation and the effectiveness of government economic policies and its constructive role in achieving the rule of law, it is important to provide an analysis of the fluctuations and characteristics of judicial rulings in times of significant economic crisis; Therefore, in this article, by examining the rulings of the Court of Administrative Justice during the currency crisis of the 1990s and the current economic crisis in Iran, it is intended to provide an appropriate analysis for the above question. The results of these studies indicate that in times of economic crisis, the performance of the Administrative Court of Justice is very significant and this issue is due to the excessive intervention of executive bodies through overregulation. The Administrative Court of Justice is also negligent for not considering the fact that the occurrence of economic crisis is the main cause of overregulation.
Anvar Yadollahi; Mohammad Hossein zarei; Asadollah Yavari
Abstract
In the last century, one of the most important issues raised in education is the spread of educational justice. With the expansion of the women's role in social activities, sex and gender have changed into the most challenging field of the educational justice. In Iranian legal system, the Document on ...
Read More
In the last century, one of the most important issues raised in education is the spread of educational justice. With the expansion of the women's role in social activities, sex and gender have changed into the most challenging field of the educational justice. In Iranian legal system, the Document on the Transformation in Iran's Education and in the international context, the 2030 Document are the outstanding documents in the field of educational justice.
In the present research, information collection and the research compilation will be made using library resources and descriptive-analytical method.
The common point of these two documents relates to the dignity and status of the human beings. In this regard, both documents have accepted an identical status for both women and men. The departing point of the documents is that each one of these documents has different views towards the meaning of justice and education. . The 2030 Document perceives justice as simple and synonym with equality and defines the gender justice as the gender equality in education. The Transformation Document believes in education distribution proportionate to the needs and roles of each of the two genders. The ambiguity of the Transformation Document in explaining the needs and roles of each gender is its biggest weakness.
