Noorbakhsh Riahy; Hossein Alaee; Mohammad Moghadam Fard
Abstract
A legislative system should have only one "legal logic". that's mean, based on principles, clear criteria, principles, concepts and related sources, the method of reasoning as well as goals and ideals can be achieved. However, based on the understanding of this article about the origin and nature of ...
Read More
A legislative system should have only one "legal logic". that's mean, based on principles, clear criteria, principles, concepts and related sources, the method of reasoning as well as goals and ideals can be achieved. However, based on the understanding of this article about the origin and nature of the republic and the Islam of the system, the legislative system of the Islamic Republic is based on the legal logic of "Islamic government" on the one hand and the legal logic of "republican government" on the other. For this reason, both the supreme sovereign institutions are involved in hesitation and duplicity in the performance of duties and powers, and the study of the concept of civil rights from the perspective of fixed divine laws (Islamic government) and changing human rights laws (republican government) will always be subject to instability and challenges. Was. Hence, many believe that these two systems of thought can never be connected with the two infrastructures. The present article, in a descriptive-analytical manner, assumes that in order to reduce this challenge as much as possible, the Islamic Republic is obliged to establish an institution of Islamic Sharia (an institution neglected in the Iranian legal system).
RAHIM NOBAHAR
Abstract
This article sheds light on the origins of the Rule of saving the system (hifdh al-nidhām) in both theology and jurisprudence. The article insists the broader sense of the Rule and its close relationship with social order. While mentioning some examples of the Rule in juristic issues, the article explains ...
Read More
This article sheds light on the origins of the Rule of saving the system (hifdh al-nidhām) in both theology and jurisprudence. The article insists the broader sense of the Rule and its close relationship with social order. While mentioning some examples of the Rule in juristic issues, the article explains the importance of a transcendental and virtue-based discipline as it is conceived in the Rule. Also the article clarifies the connection of the Rule with saving the government. According to the article, the implication of the Rule in Islamic jurisprudence is more connected with protection of social order in its broad sense. Although the Rule relates to saving and protecting a good government as a necessary element of the society, it is more protecting the disciplines and systems made by human being. The insistence of the rule on social order is not limited to Islamic society and/or saving an Islamic government. Therefore, every human discipline as far as it helps the survival of human being and the quality of its life should be respected. The article also points out the ideal concept of the discipline and the potentials of the Rule for making a better social order.
