Nasrin Tabataba'i Hesari
Abstract
The sovereign nature of the registration system has included them in the public domain and run by the public sector and through civil servant. The idea of "shrinking the state" and "increasing the regulatory role of governments" has led to the idea of privatizing registries, one of the proposed ways ...
Read More
The sovereign nature of the registration system has included them in the public domain and run by the public sector and through civil servant. The idea of "shrinking the state" and "increasing the regulatory role of governments" has led to the idea of privatizing registries, one of the proposed ways of privatizing is to do the registrar's work with non-governmental experts: notaries. what is the nature of notaries (public, private, privately public), and with what legal bases can they delegate this state sovereignty task? This article, with a comparative and historical overview, concludes that, on the one hand, it is necessary to distinguish between the "notary profession" which is a private profession and the "notary role" which is a public role, based on this role, that is the public authority acting in the name of the state and it has a sovereign nature. On the other hand, although registration affairs are regarded as sovereign affairs, but based on the foreseeability of doing of sovereign affairs by attracting "people's participation" in laws, it is possible to extend the doing of registrar taskes by notary offices in accordance with the general policies of Article 44 of the Constitutional law.
Majid Najarzadeh Hanjani
Abstract
Since the beginning of its theory, the public services faced with conceptual ambiguity and its substantive diagnostic criteria, at least in practice, has not been clear. The privatization of public services and undermining the criterion of "government intervention" and "public interest purpose" added ...
Read More
Since the beginning of its theory, the public services faced with conceptual ambiguity and its substantive diagnostic criteria, at least in practice, has not been clear. The privatization of public services and undermining the criterion of "government intervention" and "public interest purpose" added to the existing ambiguity. In these circumstances, the public function doctrine, aimed at protecting the fundamental rights of citizens and their legitimate expectations and consolidation of state responsibility and prescription of regulatory in the market of public services was outlined and welcomed. According to this doctrine, apart from public services that are offered directly by the government, services that were previously provided by the government, but are now provided by the private sector, are also consideredaspublic services. This paper usingdescriptive and analyticalmethod, at first, analyzesverbalandsubstantiveconceptof public service, then reviews thecontentof public function doctrine and evolution of concept of public service and finally studiespurposes and effects ofadoption of public function doctrine.
Hasan Lotfi
Abstract
الف) فارسی کتابها - پاهکیده، امین، (1392)، تشریفات ویژه رسیدگی به دعاوی دولت در آیین دادرسی مدنی ایران، تهران: جنگل. - رفیعی، ...
Read More
الف) فارسی کتابها - پاهکیده، امین، (1392)، تشریفات ویژه رسیدگی به دعاوی دولت در آیین دادرسی مدنی ایران، تهران: جنگل. - رفیعی، علی، (1390)، اجرای احکام مدنی علیه دولت، تهران: فکرسازان. - شهری، غلامرضا، (1393)، حقوق ثبت اسناد و املاک، چاپ چهلم، تهران: جهاد دانشگاهی. - طباطبایی مؤتمنی، منوچهر، (1390)، حقوق اداری، چاپ شانزدهم، تهران: سمت. - مردانی، نادر و محمد قهرمان، (1390)، اجرای احکام مدنی و احکام و اسناد لازم‌الاجرای خارجی در ایران، تهران: میزان. - مهاجری، علی، (1392)، شرح جامع قانون اجرای احکام مدنی، جلد اول، چاپ هفتم، تهران: فکرسازان. مقالهها - رستمی، ولی و کیومرث سپهری، (1389)، «اجرای احکام مدنی علیه اشخاص حقوقی حقوق عمومی؛ موانع و راهکارها»، حقوق، دوره 40، شماره 2. - مردانی، نادر و محمدمجتبی رودی جانی، (1385)، «استثنائات وارده بر توقیف اموال در قانون اجرای احکام مدنی»، مجله کانون وکلا، شماره 192 و 193. ب) فرانسوی کتابها - Auby, Jean Marie; Bon, Pierre et Jean Bernard Auby, (2003), Droit administratif des biens, 4e éd., Dalloz. - Batselé, Didier; Mortier, Tony et Martine Scarcez, (2010), Manuel de droit administratif, Bruxelles: Bruylant. - De Laubadére et Yves Gaudemet, (1998), Traité de droit administratif, tome 2, 11e éd., L.G.D.J. - Long M., Weil P., Braibant G., Delvolvé P. et B. Genevois, (2005), Les grands arrêts de la jurisprudence administrative, 15e éd., Dalloz. مقاله - Kolongele Eberande, Désiré-Cashmir, (2014), “Immunité d’exécution, obstacle à l’exécution forcée en droit OHADA contre les entreprises et personnes publiques?”, Revue Juridique et Politique des États Francophones, Vol.68, N.2. گزارش - Gaudemet, Yves et Laurent Deruy. (2004). Rapport de groupe de travail consacré à la valorisation des biens publics, L’institut de la gestion déléguée, Disponible en: http://www.fondationigd.org/files/pdf/La%20valorisation%20des%20proprietes%20publiques%206.pdf. ج) اسپانیایی کتابها - Almerco, Sara Ccopa. (2004). El Dominio Publico; Su Desafectacion, Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru. - Alzate Rios, Luis Carlos. (2011). Temas de Derecho Procesal Administrativo Contemporáneo, Universidad La Gran Colombia. - García, Esteban Corral y José Antonio López. (2006). Reglamento de Bienes de las Entidades Locales, 3.a Edicíon, Madrid: Wolters Kluwer Espaňa. - Gordillo, Agustín A. (1967). Derecho Administrativo de la Economía, Vol.1, Ediciones Macchi, Universidad La Gran Colombia. - Murillo, Roberto Jiménez. (2005) La Constitución Comentada; Análisis Artículo por Artículo, Editado por Walter Gutierrez, Gaceta Jurídica. - Navarro, Fernando Martos. (2005). Grupo B de Administración General de la Generalitat Valenciana, Vol.1, Sevilla: Editorial Mad. مقالهها - Alvarado Esquivel, Miguel de Jesús. (2008). “Puntos Críticos en la Ejecución de las Sentencias de Amparo”, La Ciencia del Derecho Procesal Constitucional; Estudios en Homenaje a Héctor Fix- Zamudio, Vol.5. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. - Gómez-Acebo y Pombo Abogados. (2012). “¿Embargabilidad ó Inembargabilidad de los Bienes Patrimoniales?” Revista de Estudios Locales, Núm.147. - Hutchinson, Tomás. (2007). “La Ejecución de Sentencias Contra el Estado en Argentina,” en: Jorge Fernández Ruiz (coord.), Contencioso Administrativo, Culturas y Sistemas Jurídicos Comparados, México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. - Puigpelar, Oriol Mir. (1999) “¿El Fin de la Inembargabilidad de los Bienes Patrimoniales de las Administraciones Públicas?” Autonomies, Núm.25.
