نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار حقوق عمومی دانشکدگان فارابی دانشگاه تهران، قم، ایران
2 دانشجوی دکتری حقوق عمومی دانشکدگان فارابی دانشگاه تهران، قم، ایران
چکیده
قانون تأمین‌کننده نیازهای رو به رشد جامعه است. همگامی قانون با این نیازها مستلزم به‌روز‌رسانی و انطباق با آنهاست. اما این ویژگی نسبت به قانون اساسی به‌راحتی قابلیت اطلاق ندارد زیرا برخلاف قوانین عادی؛ سازوکار دشوار بازنگری در قانون اساسی، این مسئله را تحت‌الشعاع قرار می دهد. از همین‌رو با وجود آنکه اصلاح قانون اساسی همچون قوانین دیگر ضروری است، قوانین اساسی که کمتر منعطفند، کمتر بازنگری به خود دیده اند. این امر منجر می شود تا روش های غیررسمی برای اصلاح قانون اساسی رواج یابد. شناسایی عرف های حقوق اساسی بعنوان یکی از این روش ها با تکیه بر عملکرد سیاستمداران در اصلاح قانون اساسی در قالبی چون حذف بخشی از قواعد متروک و الحاق سازوکار جدید، گامی برای اصلاح و بازنگری در قانون اساسی در شاکله نانوشته است. با این حال نمیتوان هر تصمیم سیاسی را بعنوان بازنگری غیررسمی و در قالب عرف در نظر گرفت. هدف از این مقاله تبیین چارچوبی برای تغییر غیر رسمی در قانون اساسی بوسیله عرف است.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
Review in The Constitution as the unwritten principle
نویسندگان [English]
- Seyed Naser Soltani 1
- Faezeh Salimzadeh Kakroudi 2
1 Assistant Professor, Public Law, Farabi Campus, University of Tehran, Qom, Iran
2 Ph.D Student, Public Law, Farabi Campus, University of Tehran, Qom, Iran
چکیده [English]
Introduction
Constitutions hold the status of being national treasures, cherished for their intrinsic value and their material significance. Prior to the formal inscription of written constitutional texts, foundational principles often took shape in the guise of established customs. Yet, the passage of time has highlighted the constraints of fixed principles when confronted with the dynamic demands of evolving societies and emerging generations. Should these principles fail to evolve in sync with contemporary concerns, even the most meticulously crafted written constitution risks becoming an archaic relic, relegated to obscurity on library shelves. Constitution Revision functions as an equilibrium between the twin poles of stability and transformation. It serves as a counterbalance that wards against the pitfalls of constitutional instability and ceaseless amendment, while simultaneously safeguarding the elasticity that codified principles. need to accommodate evolving circumstances The concept of constitutional revision is mentioned in the texts of codified constitutions in many legal systems. However, unwritten constitutional adjustments and revisions remain. Notably, in Iran, the interplay of customary transformations alongside formal amendments revealed an intriguing omission—namely, the absence of explicit reference to constitutional revision in the face of shifting societal paradigms. A parallel scenario arose post-Islamic Revolution when the developing Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran neglected to incorporate a provision for the revision of its textual framework. Only after the decree of Ayatollah Khomeini (RA) was the principle of revision formally enshrined within the constitution's text. Yet, despite this articulation, after more than three decades this principle still lays dormant. Simultaneously, in reality and practice, there have been undeniable modifications to the implementation and utilization of certain constitutional principles, alluding to a state of "unofficial" revision that contrasts with the structured processes outlined in the Constitution.
The Comprehensive Nature of Constitutional Change
A constitution, despite its comprehensive purview, seldom possesses the capacity to encapsulate the entirety of a political system. Irrespective of its encompassment of legal principles, even the most autocratic or democratic political framework grapples with the challenge of reflecting the evolving tapestry of political changes within the confines of a constitution. In instances where a nation's constitution remains ostensibly unaltered over prolonged periods, the possibility of a subtle, unwritten evolution looms large. This article tries to elucidate the framework of informal constitutional modification through established customs. Drawing from historical precedents predating the Islamic Revolution, as well as post-revolution occurrences, alongside a comparative exploration of revision experiences in global jurisdictions, the article embarks on a quest to address the central query: Can the constitution undergo revision by way of constitutional customs?
Research Background
Regarding unwritten constitutional principles, the specific concept of constitutional revision remains shrouded in relative obscurity, with an absence of comprehensive articles or treatises delving into its intricacies. Iranian legal scholars, while contributing to the discourse surrounding formal revision within the constitution, have largely overlooked its informal, customary dimensions.
Methodology
This article embraces a descriptive-analytical methodology, an approach that holistically examines the subject matter in both its historical and contextual dimensions. The descriptive aspect entails a meticulous dissection of the historical progression of unwritten constitutional revision, tracing its evolution from pre-revolutionary times to the contemporary landscape. This chronological expedition provides invaluable insights into the genesis, evolution, and possible trajectories of unwritten revision. on the other hand, the analytical dimension engages in cross-examination of these historical occurrences, thereby identifying patterns, disparities, and commonalities that serve to shed light on the possibilities of informal constitutional change. This dual-method approach fosters a comprehensive comprehension of the subject matter by situating it within both its historical and contemporary setting.
Conclusion
Amendment and review of legal statutes are an essential part of societal development. The underlying philosophy of legislative endeavors centers on catering to societal needs, and as long as these needs persist, the volume of legal regulations inevitably increases. However, refinement and revision of existing laws rather than a sheer accumulation of statutes is an astute strategy. While the process of altering a constitution is inherently intricate, at its core, it is a form of legislation that demands responsiveness to contemporary demands. When textual revisions are hindered or fall short of aligning with the evolving demands, customary revision acts as a potential alternative. The identification and utilization of foundational customs play a pivotal role in the process of constitutional amendment. Nonetheless, caution must be exercised to prevent the misuse of these customs as tools for political manipulation. These fundamental customs, when synchronized with the tenets of governmental institutions, political actions, and the constitution's fundamental spirit, can facilitate the refinement and adaptation of core legal texts. The ambit of their influence, however, is subject to the limits and powers of governmental bodies and political actions. However, they cannot overrule the individual liberties enshrined within the constitution. In essence, these customs should function as instruments of societal progress in harmony with prevailing needs, rather than mechanisms for advancing political agendas.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Constitutional Amendment
- Unwritten Constitutional Principles
- Revision
- Foundational Customs
- the Constitution
کتابها
- بهنود، مسعود، از سید ضیاء تا بختیار (تهران: جاویدان، 1381).
- تفقّدی جامی، محمد، گذشته چراغ راه آینده است (تهران: ناشر جامی، 1355).
- جعفری ندوشن، علی اکبر، تجدیدنظرهای چندگانه در قانون اساسی مشروطه (تهران: مرکز اسناد انقلاب اسلامی، 1382).
- خمینی، روح الله، صحیفه امام، مجموعه آثار امام خمینی (س) (بیانات، پیام‌ها، مصاحبه‌ها، احکام، اجازات شرعی و نامهها)، جلد بیست و یکم (تهران: موسسه تنظیم و نشر آثار امام خمینی(ره)، 1367-1368).
- زرنگ، محمد، سرگذشت قانون اساسی در سه کشور ایران، فرانسه و آمریکا (تهران: مرکز اسناد انقلاب اسلامی، 1384).
- عمید، حسن، فرهنگ عمید (تهران: انتشارات امیر کبیر، 1374).
- غنی، سیروس، برآمدن رضاخان، برافتادن قاجار و نقش انگلیسیها، ترجمه حسن کامشاد (تهران: نیلوفر، 1377).
- فرهنگ قهرمانی، عطالله، قانون اساسی، اصلاحات و سیر تکامل آن (تهران: بی نا، 1356).
- قاسم زاده، قاسم، حقوق اساسی (تهران: چاپخانه دانشگاه تهران، 1344).
- موسکا، گائتانا وگاستون بوتو، تاریخ عقاید در مکتب های سیاسی از عهد باستان تا امروز، ترجمه حسین شهید زاده (تهران: مروارید، 1377).
- مهدی نیا، جعفر، نخست وزیران ایران، زندگی نامه عبدالحسین هژیر (تهران: پاسارگاد-پانوس، 1375).
- مدنی، سیّد جلال الدین، تاریخ سیاسی معاصر ایران، جلد 2 (قم: دفتر انتشارات اسلامی، 1387).
ب- مقالهها
- احمدزاده، امیر، «جایگاه مجلس شورای ملی در ساختار سیاسی حکومت پهلوی دوم»، فصلنامه اسناد بهارستان، شماره دوم، (1392).
- پروین، خیرالله، «از قانون اساسی عرفی تا عرف حقوق اساسی»، فصلنامه حقوق، مجله دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، شماره 2، (1392).
- خلیلی، محسن، «مقایسه مسأله بازنگری در دو قانون اساسی مشروطیت و جمهوری اسلامی ایران»، فصلنامه پژوهشکده امام خمینی و انقلاب اسلامی، شماره‌های 5 و 6، (1378).
- سلطانی، سید ناصر، «اعتبارسنجی عرف و رویه‌های قانون اساسی»، فصلنامه دانش حقوق عمومی، شماره 18، (1396).
- قاضی، ابوالفضل، «قانون اساسی: سیر مفهوم و منطوق از دید تطبیقی»، مجله دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران، شماره 28، (1371).
سند
- مشروح مذاکرات مجلس شورای اسلامی ایران ( دوره اول تا تا هفتم)، جلسه نوزدهم، 29/4/1359، صص 24-26 ، جلسه بیستم، 30/4/1359، صص 19-20، جلسه بیست و یکم، 31/4/1359، صص 17-21، تهران: نشریه مجلس و پژوهش، شماره 54 (1385).
-
Books
- De Toqueville, Alexis, Democracy in America (New York: New American Library, 1835).
- Marshall, Geoffrey & David Trotter, Constitutional Conventions: The Rules and Forms of Political Accountability (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984).
- Newman, Ralph Abraham, Essays in Jurisprudence in Honor of Roscoe Pound (Bobbs-Merrill Company: Indianapolis, Indiana, 1962).
- Regelsberger, Ferdinand, Systematisches Handbuch der deutschen Rechtswissenschaft, Abth. 1: Th. 7: Bd. 1 (Pandekten: Duncker & Humblot, 1893).
- Roznai, Yaniv, Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments: The Limits of Amendment Powers (Oxford University Press, 2017).
- Shapiro, Martin, The Success of Judicial Review Constitutional Dialogues in Comparative Perspective (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1999).
- Shapiro, Martin, and Alec Stone Sweet, On Law, Politics, and Judicialization (Oxford University Press, 2002).
- Vile, John R, Encyclopedia of Constitutional Amendments, Proposed Amendments, and Amending Issues 1789–2015, Fourth Edition (Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO, 2015).
Articles
- Albert, Richard, “The Constitutional Politics of Presidential Succession”, Hofstra L. Rev, No. 39 (2010).
- Albert, Richard, “Constitutional Amendment by Constitutional Desuetude”, The American Journal of Comparative Law, No. 62.(3), (2014).
- Albert, Richard, “The Conventions of Constitutional Amendment in Canada”, Osgoode Hall LJ, No. 53, (2015).
- Ginsburg, Tom et al., “Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases”, NTU L. Rev, 3, (2008).
- Ginsburg, Tom and Mila Versteeg, “Why Do Countries Adopt Constitutional Review?”, The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 30. 3, (2014).
- Grimm, Dieter, “Constitutional Adjudication and Constitutional Interpretation: Between Law and Politics”, NUJS L. Rev. 4, (2011).
- Lutz, Donald S, “Toward a Theory of Constitutional Amendment”, American Political Science Review, (88)2, (1994).
- Post, Robert and Reva Siegel, “Originalism as a Political Practice: The Right's Living Constitution”, Fordham L. Rev, No. 75, (2006).
- Sherry, Suzanna, “The Ninth Amendment: Righting an Unwritten Constitution”, Chi.-Kent L. Rev, No. 64, (1988).
- Strauss, David A. “The Irrelevance of Constitutional Amendments”, Harv. L. Rev. 114 (2001), 1457.
- Strauss, David A, “Does the Constitution Mean What It Says”, Harv. L. Rev. 129, No.1, (2015).
- Sullivan, Kathleen, “What's Wrong with Constitutional Amendments”, New Federalist Papers: Essays in Defense of the Constitution, 61, (1999).
- Vermeule, Adrian, “Constitutional Amendments and the Constitutional Common Law”, University of Chicago Public Law & Legal Theory Working Paper, No. 73, (2004),
- William H Rehnquist, “The Notion of a Living Constitution”, Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, No. 29, (2005).
- Whittington, Keith E, “Constructing a New American Constitution”, Constitutional Commentary, No. 27, (2010).
- Young, Ernest A, “The Constitution Outside the Constitution”, Yale LJ, No. 117, (2007).
Rule
- Text of the Constitution of Colombia (1991).
)