mahdi rezaei; nima khosravi
Abstract
The main idea of this article is that in contemporary legal thinking, the duty to give reasons has become an inseparable part of Rule of Law. However, it should be asked that how the Rule of Law can be understood as constituting the “Rule of Reasons” principle? The very notion of this article ...
Read More
The main idea of this article is that in contemporary legal thinking, the duty to give reasons has become an inseparable part of Rule of Law. However, it should be asked that how the Rule of Law can be understood as constituting the “Rule of Reasons” principle? The very notion of this article is the bond relationship between principles of duty to give reasons and Rule of Law. Contributors to this paper claim that giving reasons uphold procedural and substantive conceptions of Rule of Law. Giving reasons is the necessary part of the procedural notion since this notion requires that all the state acts must be done in a predictable and consistent way which justifies them by reasons. Also, giving reasons can serve the central part of substantive notion of Rule of Law: the main aim of this conception is to ensure certain fair goals and requiring public officials to give reasons ensures fair conduct toward citizens. As conceptualizing this relationship, in order to reach a contextual evaluation of Rule of Law, theoretical frameworks of it shall pay more attention to duty to give reasons.
Abstract
In Iran, claims concerning administrative responsibility of State are dealt with in two different courts. When the Court of Administrative Justice (“CAJ”) has ascertained the breach of law, the Ordinary Court determines the extent of the damage suffered. This duality in judicial procedure ...
Read More
In Iran, claims concerning administrative responsibility of State are dealt with in two different courts. When the Court of Administrative Justice (“CAJ”) has ascertained the breach of law, the Ordinary Court determines the extent of the damage suffered. This duality in judicial procedure is the relic of the Law on the State Council approved in 1960, which seemed logical given the constraints of that institution, which was contrary to the constitutional rules. However, the CAJ is identified in the Constitution of the I.R.I as part of the country's judiciary and the article 173 of the Constitution grants the jurisdiction over complaints, grievances, and objections of the people against the State. Accordingly, this duality is not compatible with the current judicial structure of the country and it aggravates slowness of judicial process, and increases the complexity of the judicial system and its costs, without any clear necessity.
Hasan Lotfi
Abstract
الف) فارسی کتابها - پاهکیده، امین، (1392)، تشریفات ویژه رسیدگی به دعاوی دولت در آیین دادرسی مدنی ایران، تهران: جنگل. - رفیعی، ...
Read More
الف) فارسی کتابها - پاهکیده، امین، (1392)، تشریفات ویژه رسیدگی به دعاوی دولت در آیین دادرسی مدنی ایران، تهران: جنگل. - رفیعی، علی، (1390)، اجرای احکام مدنی علیه دولت، تهران: فکرسازان. - شهری، غلامرضا، (1393)، حقوق ثبت اسناد و املاک، چاپ چهلم، تهران: جهاد دانشگاهی. - طباطبایی مؤتمنی، منوچهر، (1390)، حقوق اداری، چاپ شانزدهم، تهران: سمت. - مردانی، نادر و محمد قهرمان، (1390)، اجرای احکام مدنی و احکام و اسناد لازم‌الاجرای خارجی در ایران، تهران: میزان. - مهاجری، علی، (1392)، شرح جامع قانون اجرای احکام مدنی، جلد اول، چاپ هفتم، تهران: فکرسازان. مقالهها - رستمی، ولی و کیومرث سپهری، (1389)، «اجرای احکام مدنی علیه اشخاص حقوقی حقوق عمومی؛ موانع و راهکارها»، حقوق، دوره 40، شماره 2. - مردانی، نادر و محمدمجتبی رودی جانی، (1385)، «استثنائات وارده بر توقیف اموال در قانون اجرای احکام مدنی»، مجله کانون وکلا، شماره 192 و 193. ب) فرانسوی کتابها - Auby, Jean Marie; Bon, Pierre et Jean Bernard Auby, (2003), Droit administratif des biens, 4e éd., Dalloz. - Batselé, Didier; Mortier, Tony et Martine Scarcez, (2010), Manuel de droit administratif, Bruxelles: Bruylant. - De Laubadére et Yves Gaudemet, (1998), Traité de droit administratif, tome 2, 11e éd., L.G.D.J. - Long M., Weil P., Braibant G., Delvolvé P. et B. Genevois, (2005), Les grands arrêts de la jurisprudence administrative, 15e éd., Dalloz. مقاله - Kolongele Eberande, Désiré-Cashmir, (2014), “Immunité d’exécution, obstacle à l’exécution forcée en droit OHADA contre les entreprises et personnes publiques?”, Revue Juridique et Politique des États Francophones, Vol.68, N.2. گزارش - Gaudemet, Yves et Laurent Deruy. (2004). Rapport de groupe de travail consacré à la valorisation des biens publics, L’institut de la gestion déléguée, Disponible en: http://www.fondationigd.org/files/pdf/La%20valorisation%20des%20proprietes%20publiques%206.pdf. ج) اسپانیایی کتابها - Almerco, Sara Ccopa. (2004). El Dominio Publico; Su Desafectacion, Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru. - Alzate Rios, Luis Carlos. (2011). Temas de Derecho Procesal Administrativo Contemporáneo, Universidad La Gran Colombia. - García, Esteban Corral y José Antonio López. (2006). Reglamento de Bienes de las Entidades Locales, 3.a Edicíon, Madrid: Wolters Kluwer Espaňa. - Gordillo, Agustín A. (1967). Derecho Administrativo de la Economía, Vol.1, Ediciones Macchi, Universidad La Gran Colombia. - Murillo, Roberto Jiménez. (2005) La Constitución Comentada; Análisis Artículo por Artículo, Editado por Walter Gutierrez, Gaceta Jurídica. - Navarro, Fernando Martos. (2005). Grupo B de Administración General de la Generalitat Valenciana, Vol.1, Sevilla: Editorial Mad. مقالهها - Alvarado Esquivel, Miguel de Jesús. (2008). “Puntos Críticos en la Ejecución de las Sentencias de Amparo”, La Ciencia del Derecho Procesal Constitucional; Estudios en Homenaje a Héctor Fix- Zamudio, Vol.5. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. - Gómez-Acebo y Pombo Abogados. (2012). “¿Embargabilidad ó Inembargabilidad de los Bienes Patrimoniales?” Revista de Estudios Locales, Núm.147. - Hutchinson, Tomás. (2007). “La Ejecución de Sentencias Contra el Estado en Argentina,” en: Jorge Fernández Ruiz (coord.), Contencioso Administrativo, Culturas y Sistemas Jurídicos Comparados, México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. - Puigpelar, Oriol Mir. (1999) “¿El Fin de la Inembargabilidad de los Bienes Patrimoniales de las Administraciones Públicas?” Autonomies, Núm.25.
