Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Public Law, Faculty of Law, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

2 MA. Student, Public Law, Faculty of Law, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Introduction

The experience of drafting a constitution in Iran has a long and complex history. Awareness of the need for a constitution dates back to the Qajar era, when a number of intellectuals and prime ministers began to recognize its importance. Figures such as Mirza Hussein Khan Sepahsalar even went so far as to draft constitutional proposals, though none of these early efforts resulted in an official constitution. Nonetheless, these initial steps laid the groundwork for the eventual success of the 1906 Constitutional Movement (known as Mashruteh) and the establishment of the National Assembly (or  Majles-e Shora-ye Melli). Iran’s first constitution (known as Qanun-e Asasi-ye Mashruteh) was ratified by the National Assembly in 1906 and 1907. It consisted of two documents: The Fundamental Law (Nezam-Nameh-ye Asasi) and the Amendment (Motammem). The reason for having two separate charters lies in the unique circumstances surrounding the approval of the main document. The Fundamental Law was drafted hastily due to special circumstances, resulting in the omission of several essential principles. Over time, these shortcomings became evident, prompting various individuals and groups to advocate for an additional law. This led to the creation of the Amendment, which was intended to complement and complete the Fundamental Law. The Persian Constitution of 1906 was the foundational document that marked the end of absolute monarchy and the beginning of the rule of law in Iran. It also addressed the rights and freedoms of Iranians. As such a significant and valuable text, it deserves thorough research, particularly as a starting point for understanding the concept of constitution in modern Iran. However, as many scholars and historians have pointed out, it has not received the attention or analysis it truly merits.

Literature Review

A comprehensive, standalone investigation into the Persian Constitution of 1906 and the details of its drafting has yet to be conducted. However, certain aspects have been addressed in the literature. For instance, the entry titled “Constitutional Revolution” in Encyclopaedia Iranica explored the topic from different perspectives (Amir-Arjomand, 1992). The article “Iran’s 1907 Constitution and Its Sources: A Critical Comparison” (Massie & Afary, 2018) examined various aspects of the Persian Constitution of 1906, including its drafting. Additionally, Khobrooy-Pak (2011) discussed relevant themes in his essay “The Search for Lost Laws.” These studies highlight some of the underlying patterns and influences that shaped the Persian Constitution of 1906.

Materials and Methods

The present study adopted a combination of documentary, historical, and comparative approaches to offer a focused examination of the drafting and structure of the Persian Constitution of 1906. First, the study explored the emergence of constitutionalist idea in Iran, early constitutional drafts preceding the 1906 Constitutional Revolution, and the necessity of drawing inspiration from foreign models. Second, it analyzed the drafting process of the Fundamental Law (Nezam-Nameh-ye Asasi) and the Amendment (Motammem), including the selection and composition of drafters and the drafting commissions. Finally, the analysis identified the constitutions that served as references, evaluating their applicability, and gaining a clearer understanding of the motivations and methods behind adopting foreign models. Moreover, the relevant data was collected from historical documents and researches. The analysis focused on biographies of the constitution-makers, as well as the historical and geographical contexts that shaped Iran’s exposure to the countries it drew inspiration from. In this way, the study identified the statutes that served as models for the Persian Constitution of 1906. Finally, the collected data was evaluated and verified, and the model constitutions were compared to assess both the method and the extent of emulation.

Results and Discussion

According to the results, the majority of articles in the Amendment (Motammem) and many in the Fundamental Law (Nezam-Nameh-ye Asasi) were not original ideas of the constitution-makers but were instead borrowed or, in some cases, adapted from the constitutions of other countries. Regarding the models of emulation, the Fundamental Law drew inspiration from various foreign constitutions, including those of Bulgaria (1879), Germany (1850), Belgium (1831), France (1848), the Ottoman Empire (1876), and Russia (1906). Among these, Bulgaria, Belgium, and Germany were particularly influential, with 27, 19, and 17 articles, respectively, showing similarities to certain articles in the Fundamental Law. Specifically, ten articles were closely adapted from Bulgaria, three from Germany, and one from Belgium, along with minor modifications. However, the constitution-makers demonstrated a degree of independence in their approach, adapting these foreign principles to suit Iran’s unique circumstances and making substantial changes in foreign concepts to align them with the Iranian context.
In contrast, only six articles in the Amendment were unique to Iranian law. The overwhelming majority of its fundamental articles were derived from the Belgian Constitution of 1831. Specifically, 94 out of 107 articles in the Amendment were adapted from Belgium. Among the remaining articles, five articles appeared to have been influenced by the Bulgarian Constitution. Some articles adapted from Belgium may have incorporated elements or minor modifications drawn from Bulgaria. In other words, the drafters likely considered the provisions of both the Belgian and Bulgarian constitutions, selectively integrating elements from the latter that they found more effective or suitable for Iran’s context, alongside the Belgian principles. In addition to Bulgaria, the French Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen had a significant influence on drafting the text, particularly in Articles 9 and 28. Article 9 addresses the inviolability of individuals’ lives and property, while Article 28 relates to the separation of powers. Finally, Article 1 of the Amendment can be seen as a model derived from the Ottoman Constitution, due to both the linguistic similarities and the shared religious beliefs prevalent in both countries.

Conclusion

The question of why and how nations draft and adopt their first constitution has long been a fundamental issue, particularly within legal and political studies. However, this critical line of inquiry has not been explored as thoroughly as it should in the case of The Persian Constitution of 1906, which stands as Iran’s first formal constitution. In this respect, the present study shed light on the historical development of Iran’s first constitutional elements by analyzing the drafting process, examining the role of the constitution-makers, and identifying the legal models that influenced the two foundational documents of the Persian Constitution of 1906. In addition to the method and extent of emulation, several other questions arise: Why did the drafters of the Persian Constitution of 1906 choose to omit certain articles from foreign constitutions while including others that were unique to Iran and distinct from the reference countries? Moreover, given this approach to emulation, in which category of constitutional laws does the Persian Constitution of 1906 belong, and what shortcomings or improvements can be identified when compared to other types of constitutions? These questions can be a source of inspiration for future research.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  • Books

    • Abrahamian, Yervand, Iran Between Two Revolutions, Translated by Ahmad Gol-Mohammadi and Mohammad Ebrahim Fattahi (Tehran: Ney Publishing, 2022). [In Persian]
    • Adamiyat, Fereydun, Ideology of the Constitutional Movement in Iran, Volume 1 (Sweden: Iranian Book Foundation, 1985). [In Persian]
    • Adamiyat, Fereydun, Thought of Progress and the Rule of Law in the Sepahsalar Era (Tehran: Kharazmi Publishing, 1977). [In Persian]
    • Afaari, Jean, The Constitutional Revolution in Iran 1906-1911, Translated by Reza Rezaei (Tehran: Beeston, 2006). [In Persian]
    • Afshar, Iraj, Articles of Taqizadeh (Constitutionalism), Volume 1 (Tehran: Toos Publications, 2008). [In Persian]
    • Afshar, Iraj, Qabalah Tarikh (Tehran: Talaye, 1989). [In Persian]
    • Agheli, Baqer, Biographies of Contemporary Political and Military Figures in Iran, Volume 3 (Tehran, Goftar Publishing with the cooperation of Elm Publishing, 2001). [In Persian]
    • Amanat, Abbas, Modern History of Iran, Translated by M. Hafez (Electronic Publication, Faragard Publishing, 2021). [In Persian]
    • Bamdad, Mehdi, Biographies of Iranians in the 12th, 13th, and 14th Centuries AH, Volumes 1 to 6 (Tehran: Zavar, 1978). [In Persian]
    • Bastani Parizi & Mohammad Ebrahim, List of Announcements and the Political Environment and Life of Moshiral-Doleh Pirnia (Tehran: Donyaye Ketab, 1982). [In Persian]
    • Brown, Edward, History of Print and Literature in Iran, Translated by Mohammad Abbasi (Tehran: Elm Publishing, 2007). [In Persian]
    • Doulatabadi, Yahya, The Life of Yahya, Volume 2 (Tehran: Rudaki Printing House, 1982). [In Persian]
    • Etehadie, Mansoureh, Emergence and Evolution of Constitutional Political Parties (First and Second Sessions of the National Parliament) (Tehran: Gostareh, 1982). [In Persian]
    • Fortescue, L.S., Men of Tehran and Some Provinces in Northwestern Iran, Translated by Mohammad Ali Kazembeigi (Tehran: Center for Diplomacy Documents and History, 2000). [In Persian]
    • Hedayat, Mehdi Gholi Khan, Memories and Hazards (Tehran: Zavar Bookstore, 1965). [In Persian]
    • Kasravi, Ahmad, History of Constitutionalism in Iran, Volume 1 (Tehran: Amir Kabir Publications, 1984). [In Persian]
    • Khobrooye Pak, Mohammad Reza, Search in The Lost Law (Electronic Version, 2011). [In Persian]
    • Moradkhani, Fardin, Foundations of Constitutionalism: Iranians' Familiarity with Legal Concepts in the Qajar Era (Tehran: Sahami-e Enteshar Company, 2020). [In Persian]
    • Moradkhani, Fardin, Legal Reading of the Constitutional Revolution in Iran (Tehran: Mizan Publishing, 2017). [In Persian]
    • Masoudi, Ali, Iranian Constitutionalism and the Legal Issue (Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publications, 2020). [In Persian]
    • Mostasharal-Doleh, Sadeq, Historical Notes (Memories and Documents of Mostasharal-Doleh Sadeq), Edited by Iraj Afshar, Volume 1 (Tehran: Ferdousi, 1982). [In Persian]
    • Mostofi, Abdullah, Biographical Description of Me or Social and Administrative History of the Qajar Period, Volume 2 (Tehran: Zavar, 2009). [In Persian]
    • Nazemal-Islam Kermani, Mirza Mohammad, History of the Awakening of Iranians (Tehran: Amir Kabir Publications, 2008). [In Persian]
    • Nejad Najafian, Mohammad Amin, National Parliament (Tehran: Elm Publishing, 2015). [In Persian]
    • Nourai, Fereshte, Realization in the Thoughts of Mirza Malkom Khan Nazemal-Doleh (Tehran: Sahami-e Jibi Company in Collaboration with Franklin Publications: 1973). [In Persian]
    • Qajar, Naseral-Din Shah, Naseral-Din Shah's Travelogue to France, with an introduction by Abdullah Mostofi (Tehran: Mashal Publications in Collaboration with Ghazal Publications, 1983). [In Persian]
    • Qajar, Mozaffaral-Din Shah, Mozaffaral-Din Shah Qajar's Second Travelogue to France (Tehran: Shahanshahi Printing House, 1941). [In Persian]
    • Qazi Shariyat Panahi, Seyed Abolfazl, Foundations of Fundamental Rights (Tehran: Mizan Publishing, 2017). [In Persian]
    • Raisnia, Rahim, Iran and the Ottoman Empire on the Eve of the Twentieth Century, Volumes 1 to 3 (Tabriz: Sotodeh, 1995). [In Persian]
    • Rayin, Esmail, Forgetfulness and Freemasonry in Iran, Volume 1 (Tehran: Amir Kabir Publications; 1978). [In Persian]
    • Rayin, Esmail, Heider Khan Amouoghli, Volume 1 (Tehran: Rayin Research Institute). [In Persian]
    • Safaei, Ebrahim, Leaders of Constitutionalism, Volumes 1 and 2 (Tehran: Javidan, 1984). [In Persian]
    • Sharif Kashani, Mohammad Mehdi, Incidental Events in the Era, Edited by Mansoureh Ettehadie and Cyrus Saadvandian (Tehran, Iran History Publishing, 1983). [In Persian]
    • Tabrizi (Mostasharal-Doleh), Mirza Yusef Khan, One Word, Edited by Baqer Momeni (London: Mehri Publishing, 2018). [In Persian]
    • Talebof, Abdolrahim, Book of Ahmad, Introduction and Annotations by Baqer Momeni (Tehran: Shabgir, 1977). [In Persian]
    • Talebof, Abdolrahim, Book of Ahmad or Issues of Life, with an Appendix of the Translation of the Japanese Constitution (Tehran: Shiraze Publishing, 2017). [In Persian]
    • Taqizadeh, Seyed Hassan, History of the Constitutional Revolution in Iran, edited by Azizollah Alizadeh (Tehran: Ferdos Publications, 2000). [In Persian]
    • Taqizadeh, Seyed Hassan, Stormy Life (Memories of Seyed Hassan Taqizadeh), Edited by Iraj Afshar (Tehran: Elmi, 1989). [In Persian]
    • Tehrani, Mohammad Ali, Observations and Social-Political Analysis of the History of the Constitutional Revolution in Iran (Tehran: Sahami-e Enteshar Company, 2000). [In Persian]
    • Zarka, Jean-Claude, Introduction to Fundamental Rights, translated and compiled by Mohammad Jalali and Asadollah Yavari (Tehran: Mizan Publishing, 2020). [In Persian]

    Articles

    • Amirarjmand, Saeed, “Constitutional Law”, Amir Kabir Publications, Articles Series of Encyclopaedia Iranica, No. 3, (2003). [In Persian]
    • Khanmohammadi, Ali Akbar, “Booklet of the Holy Law of the Reformation of Mirza Saeed Khan Mo'tamenal-Molk”, Economic Information, No. 132-131, (1998). [In Persian]
    • Masoudnia, Hossein, “The Impact of Ottoman Regulations on Modernization in Nineteenth-Century Iran”, Journal of Foreign Relations History, No. 20, (2004). [In Persian]
    • Navaei, Abdolhossein, “How Was the Constitution of Iran and Its Supplement Formulated?”, Yadegar Journal, No. 33, (1947). [In Persian]
    • Qazi Shariyat Panahi, Seyed Abolfazl, “Constitutional Law, Evolutionary Course and Verbal from a Comparative Perspective”, Faculty of Law and Political Science, No. 28, (1992). [In Persian]
    • Rasekh, Mohammad & Bakhshizadeh, Fatemeh, “The Concept of Law in the Constitutional Period: Pioneering Writers”, Legal Research Quarterly, No. 68, (2014). [In Persian]
    • Saboor, Akbar, “Study of the Political Role and Function of Saadal-Doleh in the First Consultative Assembly”, Payam-e Baharestan Journal, No. 12, (2011). [In Persian]
    • Taqizadeh, Seyed Hassan, “The Term of Constitutionalism”, Monthly Information Magazine, No. 77, (1954). [In Persian]
    • Torkchi, Fatemeh, “Akhtar; Soroush-e Azadi”, Payam-e Baharestan Journal, No. 40, (2014). [In Persian]
    • Various Authors, “Introduction of Haj Mohammad Hassan Aminal-Zarb (Final Part)”, Chamber of Commerce Newsletter, No. 534, (2012). [In Persian]
    • Zargari-Nejad, Gholamhossein, “Government Law of Iran (Naseri Era's Third Fundamental Law)”, University of Tehran History Group Journal, No. 4, (2003). [In Persian]

    Rules

    • Belgium's Constitution of 1831. [In Persian]
    • Constitution of the Kingdom of Prussia 1850. [In Persian]
    • Constitution of the Netherlands 1848. [In Persian]
    • Constitution of the Principality of Bulgaria 1879. [In Persian]
    • French Constitution of 1791. [In Persian]
    • French Constitutional Charter of 1830. [In Persian]
    • French Constitution of 1848. [In Persian]
    • French Constitution of 1852. [In Persian]
    • French Constitutional Laws of 1875. [In Persian]
    • Instrument of Government 1653. [In Persian]
    • Russian Fundamental Laws 1906. [In Persian]
    • The Ottoman Constitution 1876. [In Persian]