Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

• vali rostami
• sajad karimi pashaki

UT

Abstract

the legislator in three periods of 1981, 2006 and 2013 took action to establish the rules of procedure governing the Administrative Court of Justice, and in this way, the establishment of specialized boards as well as the general board of the Administrative Court of Justice focused on the procedures related to the request for annulment, which is one One of the important duties of these committees is to be qualified. Considering the amendment of some of the provisions of the law governing the proceedings of this judicial authority in 2023 and the creation of credibility to the "non-cancellation" votes issued by the specialized boards as well as the general board through the ruling of Article 93 of the Law of the Administrative Court of Justice and the need to publish the opinions These authorities, among others, with the work "Non-cancellation"the authors try to answer this question in this article, which was compiled with a descriptive-analytical method: the status and credit effects of the ruling on "non-cancellation" of the regulations of the board. What are the general and specialized boards of the Court of Administrative Justice, and from such opinions can we infer the correctness and influence of the regulation?

Keywords

• Administrative Court of Justice
• administrative proceedings
• specialized boards
• general board
• non-cancellation

Main Subjects

• Public Law