دکترین حاشیه مجاز تفسیر در رویه دادگاه اروپایی حقوق بشر

شریفی طرازکوهی, حسین; مبینی, جواد

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

¹ دانشگاه امام حسین (ع)

² مرکز تحقیقات و اطلاع رسانی اتاق اسلامی

چکیده

در خصوص ماهیت دکترین حاشیه مجاز تفسیر، دیدگاههای متفاوتی وجود دارد. برخی بر این باورند که اگرچه دکترین مزبور امکان اجرای حقوق بشر بر اساس ویژگیهای محلی را امکان‌پذیر ساخته، اما نحوه استفاده آن توسط دادگاه اروپایی حقوق بشر به نسبی‌گرایی منتهی نشده است. ولی این نوشتار بر این باور است که دکترین مزبور ریشه در نسبیگرایی ضعیف (جهانشمولی قوی) دارد. بررسی دلایل منطقی و مبانی اعمال دکترین حاشیه مجاز تفسیر در رویه دادگاه اروپایی حقوق بشر، تأملی بر آرای دادگاه در این زمینه و هم‌چنین بررسی مباحث پیرامون ماهیت نسبی‌گرایی این دکترین در ادبیات، شواهدی دالّ بر تأیید این مدعا است که حاشیه مجاز تفسیر، ریشه در نسبی‌گرایی فرهنگی دارد. از طرفی دیگر، با مطالعه کمّی و کیفی تنوعات پذیرفته شده از طرف این دکترین، از مجرای بررسی: حوزه، گستره و استانداردهای کاربست حاشیه مجاز تفسیر در رویه دادگاه اروپایی حقوق بشر، این نتیجه حاصل می‎شود که نسبی‌گرایی مذکور را می‌توان نسبی‌گرایی ضعیف نامید.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Application of the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights

نویسندگان [English]

Hossein Sharifi Tarazkoohi ¹
Javad Mobini ²

چکیده [English]

Jurists have expressed various propositions about the true nature of Margin of Appreciation Doctrine. Some believe that although application of the doctrine allows for exercise of human rights with having local cultural diversities in consideration, following up with cited doctrine in practice by European Court of Human Rights has not been amounted yet to relativism. This paper however, suggests that the doctrine sits on shaky relativism but rather strong universalism. It further argues that the study of rational behind the application of the doctrine in European Court of Human Rights practice, the Court’s decisions wherein similar reference has been made and the study of available academic literature on this topic show that Margin of Appreciation Doctrine emanates from cultural relativism. On the other hand, quantitative and qualitative study of the diversities are accepted by the doctrine – in terms of scope, field of reference and application standards – leads to the conclusion that the Margin of Appreciation may be regarded as ‘Weak Cultural Relativism.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Human Rights
European Court of Human Rights
Margin of Appreciation Doctrine
Cultural Relativism

مراجع

- Aileen, McHarg, (1999), “Reconciling Human Rights and the Public

Interest: Conceptual Problems and Doctrinal Uncertainty in the Jurisprudence of

the European Court of Human Rights”, The Modern Law Review, Vol. 62, No. 5

Sep.

- Arai-Takahashi, Yutaka, (2001), Margin of Appreciation Doctrine and

Principle of Proportionality in the Jurisprudence of the ECHR, Oxford: Hart

Publishing.

- Bakircioglu, Onder, (2007), “The Application of the Margin of

Appreciation Doctrine in Freedom of Expression and Public Morality Cases”,

German Law Journal,Vol. 08, No. 07.

- Benvenisti, Eyal, (1999), “Margin of Appreciation, Consensus, and

Universal Standards”, International Law and Politics, Vol. 31.

- Brauch, Jeffrey A, (2004),”The Margin of Appreciation and the

Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights: Threat to the Rule of

Law”, 11 COLUMBIA JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN LAW, 113 .

- Delmas-Marty, Mireille, (1992), The European Convention for the

Protection of Human Rights: International Protection Versus National

Restrictions, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publications.

- Del Moral, Ignacio de la Rasilla, (2006), “The Increasingly Marginal

Appreciation of the Marginof-Appreciation Doctrine”, German Law

Journal,Vol. 07 No. 06.

- Dijak, P.Van and Hoof, G.J.H Van, (1998), Practice of the European

Convention on Human Rights, Hague: Kluwer Law International.

- Donnelly, Jack, (1984), “Cultural Relativism and Universal Human Rights”,

Human Rights Quarterly, Volume 6, Number 4, pp. 400-419

- Donnelly, Jack, (2003), Universal Human Rights in Theory and

Practice,New York: Cornell University Press.

- Donnelly, Jack, (2007), “The Relative Universality of Human Rights”,

Human Rights Quarterly, Volume 29, Number 2, pp.281-306.

- Donnelly, Jack, (2008), “Human Rights: Both Universal and Relative (A

Reply to Michael Goodhart)”, Human Rights Quarterly, Volume 30, February

2008, pp. 194-204.

- Dzehtsiarou, Kanstantsin, (2011),“European Consensus and the Evolutive

Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights”,German Law

Journal,Vol. 12 No. 10, 2011.

- Gomien, Donna et.al, (1996), Law and Practice of the European

Convention on Human Rights and the European Social Charter,Strasbourg:

Council of Europe Publishing.

- Goodhart, Michael, (2008), “Neither Relative nor Universal: A Response to

Donnelly”, Human Rights Quarterly, Volume 30, pp.183-193.

- Gould, Carol C, (2004),Globalizing Democracy and Human Rights,

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

- Greene, Alan, (2011), “Separating Normalcy from Emergency: The

Jurisprudence of Article 15 of the European Convention on Human Rights”,

German Law Journal, Vol. 12 No. 10.

- Greer, Steven, (2000), “The Margin of Appreciation Interpretation and

Discretion Under The European Convention on Human Rights

Strasbourg”,Council of Europe Publishing, July.

- Hey, Hilde, (2001), “Universal Human Rights and Cultural Diversity”,

HUMAN RI G H T S & HUMAN WE L FA R E, VOLUME 1:2 – A PRIL.

-http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/cooperation/lisbonnetwork/themis/ECHR/ Paper2

_en.asp.

- Kratochvíl, Jan, (2011),“The Inflation of the Margin of Appreciation by the

European Court of Human Rights”, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights,

Vol. 29/3, 324–357.

- Letsas, George, (2007), A Theory of Interpretation of the European

Convention on Human Rights,Oxford: Oxford University Press.

- Shany, Yuva, (2005),“Toward a General Margin of Appreciation Doctrine

in International Law?”The European Journal of International Law, Vol. 16 no.5,

pp.907–940.

- Spielmann, Dean, (2012),“Allowing the Right Margin the European Court

of Human Rights and the National Margin of Appreciation Doctrine: Waiver or

Subsidiarity of European Review?”, Center for European Legal Studies, (CELS

Working Paper, University of Cambridge- Faculty of Law).

- Sweeney, James Anthony, (2003), “Margins of Appreciation, Cultural

Relativity and the European Court of Human Rights”, being a Thesis Submitted

for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of Hull, February 2003.

--------------- , (2005),“Margins of Appreciation: Cultural Relativity and the

European Court of Human Rights in the post-Cold War era”, International and

Comparative Law Quarterly, 54 (2). pp. 459-474. Available at: Durham

Research Online (Deposited in DRO: 13 August 2008)

http://dro.dur.ac.uk/3269/1/3269.pdf (Last Visited: 19 Jul 2012).

- Tümay, Mura, (2008), THE “MARGIN OF APPRECIATION

DOCTRINE” DEVELOPED BY THE CASE LAW OF THE EUROPEAN

COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, Ankara Law Review, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 201-234

- Wada, Emily, (2005),“A Pretty Picture: The Margin of Appreciation and the

Right to Assisted Suicide”, 27 Loy. L.A. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 275.

- Yourow, Howard Charles, (1996), the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in

the Dynamics of European Human Rights Jurisprudence, Dordrecht: Martinus

Nijhoff Publishers.

پژوهش حقوق عمومی

دکترین حاشیه مجاز تفسیر در رویه دادگاه اروپایی حقوق بشر

مراجع

مراجع

دوره 16، شماره 44 - شماره پیاپی 44
فصلنامه پژوهش حقوق عمومی شماره 44 مربوط به پاییز 1393 بوده که در اسفندماه 1393 به چاپ خواهد رسید
اسفند 1393
صفحه 73-103

دکترین حاشیه مجاز تفسیر در رویه دادگاه اروپایی حقوق بشر

مراجع

مراجع

دوره 16، شماره 44 - شماره پیاپی 44فصلنامه پژوهش حقوق عمومی شماره 44 مربوط به پاییز 1393 بوده که در اسفندماه 1393 به چاپ خواهد رسیداسفند 1393صفحه 73-103

دوره 16، شماره 44 - شماره پیاپی 44
فصلنامه پژوهش حقوق عمومی شماره 44 مربوط به پاییز 1393 بوده که در اسفندماه 1393 به چاپ خواهد رسید
اسفند 1393
صفحه 73-103