الف) فارسی
مقاله‌ها
- بارین چهاربخش، ویکتور، (1390)، «ارزیابی حق دفاع مشروعی جمعی در حقوق بین‌المللی معاصر»، ترجمه علی قاسمی، دیدگاه‌های حقوق قضایی، دوره 16، شماره 56.
- راعی، مسعود، (1388)، «کنترل کلی یا کنترل مؤثر عاملی برای تحقق مسئولیت بین‌المللی دولت؟»، مطالعات حقوق خصوصی (حقوق سابق)، دوره 93، شماره 3.
- زمانی، مسعود و نیکویی، مجید، (1395)، «حق تعیین سرنوشت: بررسی جدایی کریمه از اوکراین از منظر حقوق بین‌الملل و حقوق داخلی»، تحقیقات حقوقی، شماره 73.
- سیفی، سید جمال، (1373)، «تحولات مفهوم حاکمیت دولت‌ها در پرتو اصل تعیین سرنوشت ملت‌ها»، تحقیقات حقوقی، شماره 15.
- شادلو، شیده، (1393)، «بررسی حمله عربستان به یمن (به عنوان بحران اخیر منطقه خلیج فارس)، با تاکید بر موازین حقوق»، مطالعات خلیج فارس، دوره 1، شماره 4.
- صفایی، سید حسین، (1364)، «استناد به استفاده بلاجهت با وجود رابطه قراردادی»، مجله حقوقی بین‌المللی، دوره 2، شماره 2.
- عزیزی، ستار، (1390)، «بررسی مشروعیت دعوت از مداخله خارجی در مخاصمات داخلی با تاکید بر رای دیوان بین‌المللی دادگستری»، پژوهش حقوق عمومی، دوره 13، شماره 33.
- محمد علی‌پور، فریده و ممتاز، جمشید، (1381)، «دفاع مشروع»، مجلس و راهبرد، دوره 9، شماره 35.
ب) انگلیسی
Books
- Abbas, A, (2014), Complete International Law: Text, Cases, Materials, 1st edition, Oxford: OUP.
- Akiner, S, et al. (2013), Tajikistan: The Trials of Independence, 1st edition, London: Rutledge.
- Blackeley, R, (2009), State Terrorism and Neo-Liberalism: The North in the South, 1st edition, London: Rutledge.
- Chen, T, (1951), The International Law of Recognition, 2nd edition, Russia: Рипол Классик.
- Clapham, A, (2006), Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Actors, 1st edition, Oxford: OUP.
- Corten, O, (2010), The Law against War: The Prohibition on the Use of Force in Contemporary International Law, 1st edition, New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
- d’Aspremont, J, (2011), 1989–2010: The Rise and fall of Democratic Governance in International Law, in J. Crawford (ed.), Select Proceedings of the European Society of International Law.
- Dinstein, (2011), War, Aggression and Self-Defense, 1st edition, Cambridge: CUP.
- Gray, C, (2008), International Law and the Use of Force, 1st edition, Oxford: OUP.
- Lauterpacht, H, (1947), Recognition by International Law, 4th edition, Cambridge: CPU.
- Lieblich, E, (2013), International Law and Civil Wars: Intervention and Consent, 1st edition, London: Rutledge.
- Mansell, W, et al. (2015), A Critical Introduction to Law, 1st edition, London: Routledge.
- Peterson, M, (1997), Recognition of Governments: Legal Doctrine and State Practice 1815–1995, 2nd edition, Oxford: OUP.
- Roth, B, (2000), ‘The Illegality of “Pro-Democratic” Invasion Pacts’ in G. Fox, B. Roth (eds), Democratic Governance and International Law, 1st edition, Cambridge: CUP.
- Talmon, S, (1998), Recognition of Governments in International Law: With Particular References to Governments in Exile, 2nd edition, Oxford: OUP.
- Wippman, D, (2000), ‘Pro-Democratic Intervention by Invitation’ in G. Fox, B. Roth (eds), Democratic Governance and International Law, 1st edition, Cambridge: CUP.
Articles
- Bannelier, K, Christakis, T, (2013), “Under the Security Council’s Watchful Eyes: Military Intervention by Invitation in the Malian Conflict”, Leiden Journal of International Law, Vol. 26, No. 2.
- Bethlehem, D. (2012), “Self-Defense against an Imminent or Actual Armed Attack by Nonstate Actors”, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 106, No. 1.
- Burke-White, W, (2014), “Crimea and the International Legal Order”, Faculty Scholarship Paper, Vol. 6, No. 2.
- Crook, J, (2013), “Contemporary Practice of the United States: United States Provides Military Support to French Operations against Militants in Mali”, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 107, No. 4.
- D’Amato, A, (1990), “The Invasion of Panama Was a Lawful Response to Tyranny”, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 84, No. 3.
- d’Aspremont, J, (2009-2010), “Responsibility for Coups in International Law”, (2009–10) Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law, Vol. 18, No. 2.
- Deeks, A, (2012), “Unwilling or Unable: Toward A Normative Framework for Extraterritorial Self-Defense”, Virginia Journal of International Law Vol. 52, No. 1.
- Deeks, A, (2013), “Consent to the Use of Force and International Law Supremacy”, Harvard International Law Journal, Vol. 54, No. 1.
- Doswald-Beck, L, (1985), “The Legal Validity of Military Intervention by Invitation of the Government”, British Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 56, No. 2.
- Finucane, B, (2012), “Fictitious States, Effective Control and the US of Force against Non-State Actors”, Berkley Journal of International Law Vol. 20, No. 1.
- Franck, T, (1992), “The Emerging Right to Democratic Governance”, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 86, No. 4.
- Franck, T, (2001), “Terrorism and the Right of Self-Defense”, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 95, No. 1.
- Hakimi, M, (2015), “Defensive Force against Non-State Actors: The State of Play”, 91 International Law Studies, Vol. 91, No. 3.
- Kritsiotis, D, (2015), “Interrogations of Consent: A Reply to Erika de Wet”, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 26, No. 1.
- Le Mon, C, (2003), “Unilateral Intervention by Invitation in Civil Wars: Effective Control Test Tested”, International and Politics, Vol. 35, No. 1.
- Lieblich, E, (2011), “Intervention and Consent: Consensual Forcible Interventions in Internal Armed Conflicts as International Agreements”, Boston University International Law Journal, Vol. 29, No. 4.
- Loosteen, Y, (2000), “The Concept of Belligerency in International Law”, Military Law Review, Vol. 166, No. 2.
- Nikouei, M, Zamani, M, (2016), “The Secession of Crimea: Where Does International Law Stand?”, Nordic Journal of International Law, Vol. 85, No.1.
- Nolte, G, (1993), “Restoring Peace by Regional Action: International Legal Aspects of the Liberian Conflict”, Zerrschrift Fur Auslandisches SLANDISCHES Offentliches S Recht Und Volkkerrecht, Vol. 53, Vol.1.
- Nowrot, K, Schbacker, E, (1998). “The Use of Force to Restore Democracy: International Legal Implications of the ECOWAS Intervention in Sierra Leone”, American University International Law Review, Vol. 14, No. 2.
- Puente, I, (1954), “The Doctrines of Recognition and Intervention in Latin America”, Tulane Law Review, Vol. 3, No. 1.
- Reisman, W, (1990), “Sovereignty and Human Rights in Contemporary International Law”, 84 American Journal of International Law, Vol. 85, No. 2.
- Roth, B, (1993), “Governmental Ilegitimacy Revisited: Pro-Democratic”, Armed Intervention in the Post-Bipolar World, Transnational Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 3, No. 2.
- Roth, B, (2010), “Secessions, Coups and the International Rule of Law: Assessing the Decline of the Effective Control Doctrine”, Melbourne Journal of International Law, Vo. 11, No. 2.
- Schachter, O, (1983-4), “The Right of States to Use Armed Force”, Michigan Law Review, Vol. 82, No. 3.
- Wilmshurst, E, (2006), “The Chatham House Principles of International Law on the Use of Force in Self-Defence”, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 55, No. 4.
Website
- Akande, D. and Milanovic M. ‘The Constructive Ambiguity of the Security Council’s ISIS Resolution’, available at: www.ejiltalk.org/the-constructive-ambiguity-of-the-security-councils-isis-resolution/.
- Al Arabiya News, ‘Iran and Hezbollah trained Houthis to harm Yemenis,’ http://english.alarabiya.net/en/News/middle-east/2015/04/07/Iran-and-Hezbollah-trained-Houthis-to-harm-Yemenis-.html.
- Black, I. and Roberts, D. ‘ISIS Air Strikes: Obama’s Plan Condemned by Syria, Russia and Iran’, available at: www.theguardian.com/world/2014/sep/11/ assad-moscow-tehran-condemn-obama-isis-air-strike-plan.
- Borgen, C. ‘Recent International Legal Scholarship on the Crisis in Ukraine’, available at: www.opiniojuris.org/2015/07/24/recent-international-legal-scholarship-on-the-crisis-in-ukraine/.
- Christakis, T., Bannelier, K. ‘French Military Intervention in Mali: It’s Legal But … Why?’ available at: http://www.ejiltalk.org/french-military-intervention-in-mali-its-legal-but-why-part-i/.
- Goodman, R. ‘Taking the Weight Off of International Law: Has Syria Consented to US Airstrikes?’, available at: www.justsecurity.org/18665/weight-international-law-syria-consented-airstrikes/.
- Institut de Droit International, (1975), “The Principle of Non-Intervention in Civil Wars”, Session of Wiesbaden, available at: http:// www.justitiaetpace.org/ idiE/resolutionsE/1975_wies_03_en.pdf.
- Kreb, C. ‘The Fine Line between Collective Self-Defense and Intervention by Invitation: Reflections on the Use of Force against “IS” in Syria’, available at: https://www.justsecurity.org/20118/claus-kreb-force-isil-syria/.
- Kutsch, T. ‘US Says Houthis Obviously Receive Iran’s Support, But Experts not So Sure’, available at: www.america.aljazeera.com/articles/2015/4/10/kerry-accuses-iran-of-yemen-meddling-but-level-of-its-support-unclear.html.
- Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, ‘Intervention by Invitation’, available at: http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/ 9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1702#law-9780199231690-e1702-div2-6.
- Milanovic, M. ‘Yanukovych confirms he invited Russian intervention,’ available at: www.ejiltalk.org/yanukovych-confirms-he-invited-russian-intervention.
- Robins-Early, N. ‘Russia Says Its Airstrikes in Syria are Perfectly Legal. Are They?’ Huffington Post, available at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/russia-airstrikes-syria-international-law_560d6448e4b0dd85030b0c08.
- UN Documents for Syria, available at: http://www.securitycouncilreport.org/ un-documents/syria/
- Wisehart, D. ‘The Crisis in Ukraine and the Prohibition of the Use of Force: A Legal Basis for Russia’s Intervention?’ available at: www.ejiltalk.org/the-crisis-in-ukraine-and-the-prohibition-of-the-use-of-force-a-legal-basis-for-russias-intervention/#more-10459.
)