mahdi rezaei; mahdi rezvani
Abstract
Public policy-making is considered as the most important manifestation of government’s ruling, exertion of authority and arrangement of public affairs based on the “rule of law”. Public policy-making cycle, from think tank and policy-making to assessment and supervision is formed in ...
Read More
Public policy-making is considered as the most important manifestation of government’s ruling, exertion of authority and arrangement of public affairs based on the “rule of law”. Public policy-making cycle, from think tank and policy-making to assessment and supervision is formed in relation to basic/fundamental rights and therefore, under the influence of the legal and political system, its position and function would be different. In the Iranian legal system, the concept of “general policies of the system” has legal and political affinity/relationship with public policy-making. However, as the result of the existing legal vacuum, its position and function is questionable and accordingly strategies and solutions implied in the process of public policy-making cannot be utilized in assessment and supervision of general policies of the system. Hence, in order to utilize the capacity and capability of “public policy-making” within “general policies” concept in the structure of basic/fundamental rights system in Iran, this legal establishment shall be placed in the procedure of Constitutionalisation in two different but coordinated courses by separating minor and major departments. Therefore in the process of localization, this concept is redefined based on Iranian legal system.
kheirollah parvin; hosein delbar
Volume 15, Issue 42 , January 2015, , Pages 111-140
Abstract
Although often decisions have been made and some proper laws been determinedfor solving some problematic issues, wrong or inefficient ways of implementation oflaw and executive and administrative systems mismanagement which cause thefailure of reaching the determined goals are characterized in the assessment ...
Read More
Although often decisions have been made and some proper laws been determinedfor solving some problematic issues, wrong or inefficient ways of implementation oflaw and executive and administrative systems mismanagement which cause thefailure of reaching the determined goals are characterized in the assessment phase.Therefore, the main purpose of present essay through the first chapter is theinvestigation of the role of surveillance institutes in Iran while having the emphasison the status of the State General Inspection Organization in the process of publicpolicy making in general, and in particular is the investigation of this role in theevaluation process of laws and provisions. In the second chapter, the role ofinspection organization is addressed as well as management organization accordingto the management services in the country in the phase of “inspection ofperformance and evaluation of policies”. Achievements are good evidences to showthat these two bodies are well qualified to reform and offer the mechanisms whichmight be able to influence the performance of executive systems and can also beable to fulfill the change from the inspection- audit approach to the inspectioncorrectivesurveillance.