الف- فارسی
- سیفی، سیدجمال، (1382)، «رای دیوان بین‌المللی دادگستری در قضیه سکوهای نفتی: دیپلماسی قضایی در دادرسی‌های بین‌المللی»، مجله پژوهش های حقوقی، شماره 4.
- فرخی، رحمت ا...، رمضانی قوام آبادی محمدحسین و زمانی، قاسم، (1394)، «نقش دیوان اروپایی دادگستری در توسعه وحدت حقوقی اتحادیه اروپا»، فصلنامه پژوهش حقوق عمومی، سال هفدهم، شماره 49.
ب- انگلیسی
Articles
- Hancher, L, (2010), “Long-term Contracts and State Aid- A New Application of the EU State Aid Regime or a Special Case?”, Eur. St. Aid L.Q. Vol. 9, No. 2.
- Kende T, (2015), “Arbitral Award Classified as State Aid under European Union Law”, ELTE L.J, Vol.37, No. 1.
- Lavranos N, (2014), “Interference of European Commission in the Enforcement of Arbitration Awards: The Micula Case”, Global Investment Protection AG, Vol. 2, No. 3.
- Matei E, (2016), “SA.38517- Commission Decision of 30 March 2015 on State Aid Granted by Romania to Micula”, European State Aid Law Quarterly, Vol.15, No. 1.
- Smutny A C, Smith A, Pittt M, (2016), “Enforcement of ICSID Convention Arbitral Awards in US Courts”, Pepp. L. Rev. Vol. 43, No. 5.
- Stanivukovic M, (2017), “Legitimate Expectations: A Commentary of Micula v. Romania”, 5 Y.B. on Int’l Arb. Vol. 165, No. 5.
- Struckmann K, Forwood G, Kadri A, (2016), “Investo-State Arbitration and EU State Aid Rules: Conflict or Co-existence?”, Eur. St. Aid L.Q, Vol. 15. No. 2.
- Tietje Ch, Wackernagel C, (2015), “Enforcement of Intra-EU ICSID Award, Multilevel Governance, Investment Tribunals and the Lost Opportunity of the Micula Arbitration”, The Journal of World Investment & Trade, Vol. 16. No. 2.
- Tietje Ch, Wackernagel C, (2014), “The Enforcement of Intra-EU Investment Awards and EU State Aid Law”, Policy Paper on Transnational Economic Law. Vol. 1, No. 41.
- Wehland H, (2016), “The Enforcement of Intra-EU BIT Awards: Misula v Romania and Beyond”, The Journal of World Investment & Trade, Vol. 17, No. 6.
- Wilske S & Edworthy Ch, (2016), “The Future of Intra-European Union BITs: A Recent Development in International Investment Treaty Arbitration against Romania and Its Potential Collateral Damage”, Journal of International Arbitration. Vol. 33, No. 4.
Cases & Orders
- Case 61/79, ECR, 1205, 1980.
- Case T-646/14, Micula and Others v. Commission, ECJ, 2014.
- Deutsch Bahm AG v. Commission, Case T-351/02, ECR II-1047, 2006.
- Eastern Sugar B.V.(Netherland) v. Czech Republic, Partial Award, 2007.
- ECJ Case 26/62, Van Gen den Loos, ECR 3, 1963.
- Electrabel v. The Republic of Hungary, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/19, Decision on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law and Liability, 30 Nov 2012.
- Eureko v. Republice of Slovakia, Award on jurisdiction, arbitrability and suspension, PCA Case No. 2008-13, 2010.
- European Commission, Decision of 30 March 2015, Arbitral Reward Micula v. Romania, EU 2015/1470, 2015.
- High Court of Justice Queen’s Bench Division Commercial Court, Micula v. Romania, In the Matter of the Arbitration Act 1966, Case No: CL-2014-000251, 2017.
- Letter from European Commission to Romania, State Aid A.38517, 2014.
- Micula Case, Micula v. Romania, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/20, Final Award, 2013.
- Opinion of Advocate General Ruiz Jarabo Colomer in Joined Cases C-346/03 & C-529/03 Atzori, 2005.
- ThyssenKrupp, Cementir and Nuova Terni Industrie Chimiche, OJ EC No. L144/37, 2006.
- United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, Micula v. Romania, (On Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of New York), 15-3109-cv, 2017.
- United States Court of Appels for the Second Circuit, Micula v. Romania, Summary Order, 15-3109-cv, 2017.
- United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Micula v. Romania, Civil No. 1:14-cv-00600(APM, 2014.
- United States District Court Southern District of New York, Micula v. Romania, Opinion & Order, 2015.
- United States District Court Southern District of New York, Micula v. Romania, Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Respondent’s Motion for Order of Satisfaction of judgment, Case No.1:15-mc-00107-p1, 2016.
Electronic Sources
)