Document Type : Research Paper
Author
Associate Professor, Public Group, Faculty of Administrative and Economic Sciences, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
Abstract
The history of the evolution of legal thought indicates the contentious process of the interaction between metaphysics and reality. Meanwhile, notions such as law and justice, and in general, natural law, being the criterion for evaluating justice in the legal structure, have a more complicated situation. Petrazyski's idea on intuitive law should be considered as a new framework for the mentioned interaction; as modern natural law is based on the preeminence of metaphysical rule over reality, and classical natural law also seeks static metaphysics to provide the ground for its interaction with reality. Thus, they could not be admissible. Petrazycki endeavors to seek a dynamic metaphysics which he finds it in dynamic subjectivism. Individual intuition is another expression of this type of subjectivism which leads to the intuitive right and intuitive justice. However, one may ask whether this type of metaphysics be the foundation and even superior and evolutionary framework of law? In fact, Petraziski does not believe in such a foundation, and as a result, his metaphysical interaction with reality cannot be maintained in the framework of idealism.
Keywords
Main Subjects
کتاب‌ها
- جعفری تبار، حسن، منطق حیرانی در باب استدلال حقوقی (تهران: فرهنگ نشر نو، 1399).
- راسخ، محمد، حق و مصلحت، مقالاتی در فلسفة حقوق، فلسفة حق و فلسفة ارزش (تهران: نشر نی، 1396).
- کاتوزیان، ناصر، فلسفه حقوق، جلد اول (تهران: شرکت سهامی انتشار، 1380).
مقاله‌ها
- راسخ، محمد، «مدرنیته و حقوق دینی»، نامة حقوقی (مفید)، دورة 64، شماره 2، (1386).
- شهابی، مهدی، «از مطلق‌گرایی حقوقی تا نسبی‌گرایی حقوقی، نقدی بر تحلیل برونو اپتی از جریان‌های حقوقی متعارض در پارادایم مدرنیتة حقوقی»، فصلنامه مطالعات حقوق عمومی، دوره 49، شماره 4، (1398).
- شهابی، مهدی، «کثرت‌گرایی حقوقی، تأملی در چیستی مبنای التزام‌آوری قاعده حقوقی و متغیرهای تحول نظام حقوقی»، فصلنامه پژوهش حقوق عمومی، سال هفدهم، شماره 48، (1394).
References
Books
- Belska Serpette, Boguslawa, “Théorie petrazyckienne: les manifestations multiformes du droit”, In. Raymond Verdier (éditeur), Jean Carbonnier, l'Homme et l'œuvre (Paris: Presses universitaires de Paris Nanterre, 2012).
- Carbonnier, Jean, Sociologie juridique (Paris: Quadrige/ Puf, 1994).
- Fasso, Guido, Histoire de la philosophie du droit, XIXe et XXe siècle, traduit de l’italien par Catherine Rouffet (Paris: L. G. D. J. 1976).
- Gurvitch, Georges, “Une philosophie intuitionniste du droit: Léon Pétrasizky”, In. Archives de philosophie du droit et de la sociologie juridique (Paris: Sirey, 1931).
- Maurice, Aux sources du droit, le pouvoir, l’ordre et la liberté (Paris: Librairie Bloud et Gay, 1933).
- Jafari Tabar, Hasan, Confused Logic about Legal Reasoning (Tehran: Edition Nashr Now, 2020). [In Persian]
- Jafari Tabar, Hasan, Confused Logic about Legal Reasoning (Tehran: Edition Nashr Now, 2020). [In Persian]Katouzian, Naser, Philosophy of Law (Tehran: Edition Sahami Enteshar, 2001). [In Persian]
- Katouzian, Naser, Philosophy of Law (Tehran: Edition Sahami Enteshar, 2001). [In Persian]
- Mandelstam, André, Le sort de l’empire Ottoman (Paris: Librairie Payot et Cie Mandelstam, 1917).
- Petrazycki, Leon, Law and Morality, With a New Introduction by A. Javier Trevino (New York: Routledge, 2017).
- Rasekh, Mohammad, “Right and Expediency”, Articles in the Philosophy of Law, The Philosophy of Right and the Philosophy of Value (Tehran: Edition Ney, 2017). [In Persian]
- Rasekh, Mohammad, “Right and Expediency”, Articles in the Philosophy of Law, The Philosophy of Right and the Philosophy of Value (Tehran: Edition Ney, 2017). [In Persian]
- Villey, Michel, “François Gény et la renaissance du droit naturel”, In. Seize essais de philosophie du droit dont un sur la crise universitaire (Paris: Dalloz, 1969).
Articles
- Aillet, G, “Le droit social”, Revue De Métaphysique Et De Morale, Vol. 40, n° 2, (1933).
- Antonov, Mikhaïl, “La théorie du droit de Georges Gurvitch et ses origines philosophiques russes”, Droit et société, Vol. 94, n° 3, (2016).
- Grouber, Alexandre, “Une théorie psychologique du droit”, In. RTD Civ. (1911).
- Gurvitch, Georges, “La philosophie du droit de Hugo Grotius et la théorie moderne du droit international”, Revue De Métaphysique Et De Morale, Vol. 34, n°. 3, (1927).
- Le Fur, Louis, “La théorie du droit naturel depuis le XVIIe siècle et la doctrine moderne”, In. Recueil des cours, Acadeémie de droit international, T. 18, (1927).
- Mahdi Shahabi, “From legal absolutism to legal relativism Criticizing Bruno Oppetit's analysis of antinomic legal trends to the paradigm of legal modernity”, Public Law Studies Quarterly, V. 49, n°4, (2020). [In Persian]
- Mahdi Shahabi, “Legal Pluralism Reflection on the of Binding Nature of Legal Rule and Parameters of the Evolution of Legal System”, Public Law Research, V. 17, n°. 48, (2015). [In Persian]
- Northrop, F. S. C., “Petrażycki's Psychological Jurisprudence: Its Originality and Importance”, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 104, n° 5, (1956).
- Peno, Michał, “Leon Petrażycki and a Pluralism of the Sources of Law”, In. Juridical Tribune Journal, Tribuna Juridica; Bucharest, Vol. 9, Iss. I, (2019).
- Podgȯrecki, Adam, “Unrecognized Father of Sociology of Law: Leon Petrażycki: Reflections based on Jan Gorecki's Sociology and Jurisprudence of Leon Petrażycki”, Law & Society Review, Vol. 15, n° 1, (1980).
- Rasekh, Mohammad, “Modernity and Religious Law”, Legal Letter (Mofid), V. 64, n°2, (2007). [In Persian]
- Treves, Renato, “La sociologie du droit de Georges Gurvitch”, In. Cahiers Internationaux De Sociologie, Vol. 45, (1968).
- Villey, Michel, “Nouvelle Rhetorique et droit naturel”, In. Logique et Analyse, Nouvelle série, Vol. 19, n°. 73, (1976).
)