Public Law Researsh

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

FAQ

Peer Review Process

Journal Metrics

News

Cost of Arbitration and Printing

Referees

Referees 2020

Referees 2021

Referees 2022

Referees 2022

Umbrella Clause in Bilateral Investment Treaties

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Abstract

The Umbrella Clause has nearly become one of the most common rules of the most
investment treaties, which provides more protections for foreign investor. Providing
a proper and true sense of this clause has become highly controversial issue in
international investment law that has led many arbitral tribunals to adopt specific
stance in this respect. Here, the fundamental point is whether the forum stipulated in
the bilateral investment treaty is competent to settle disputes, which are arisen from
investment contract between host State and foreign investor, or not? If it so, then the
next question would be: what will be the effect of the determining the forum by
stipulated dispute settlement clause in the contract. Does this clause turn contract
claims into the treaty claims? And what will be the impacts and limits of this clause?
Answering to these questions, the arbitral tribunals have responded in two different
ways. Some of them have interpreted the clause in a narrow sense; they have
distinguished sovereign from non-sovereign act of host State. According to their
point of view, the Umbrella Clause of BIT may be violated if the host State measure,
in breaching its contractual obligation, is applied on the basis of its sovereignty. In
contrast, the other tribunals have interpreted this clause in a broad sense which the
violation of any contractual obligation of host State leads to a breach of this clause
and consequently the forum in the investment treaty is qualified to hear the dispute.
It seems that the broad interpretation and second approach is more logical in the
interpretation of the clause; it is also more consistent with the purpose and history
of the emergence of this clause and makes it more efficient.

Keywords

References
- Potts, Jonathan, “Stabilizing the Role of Umbrella Clauses in Bilateral
Investment Treaties: Intent, Reliance, and Internationalization” (2011) (No. 4)
Virjinia Journal of International Law, Vol. 51.
- Ethan G. Shenkman & D. Jason File, “Recent Development in Investment
Treaty Jurisprudence: Arbitrating Contract Claims under Umbrella Clauses”,
available at: www.wilmerhale.com/files/publications/9cd84cee-3ded-91a4-da
85702872/ presentationattachment/shenkmanfile2007_intlarb.pdf.
- Gautam, Pradhuman, “The Umbrella clause: A Search for Greater Legal
Certainty”, 25/08/2008, p. 12, available at: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/delivery. cfm/
ssrn.
- Reinisch,August, “Umbrella Clauses”,(2006) ,Seminar on International
Investment Protection (OECD).
- Schill, Stephan, “ Enabling Private Ordering: Function, Scope and Effect of
Umbrella Clauses in International Investment traeties” (2009) (No.1), Minnesota
Journal of International Law, Vol.18.
- Schwebel, Stephan, “On Whether the Breach by a State of a Contract with
an Alien Is a Breach of International Law” (1987), International Law at the Time
of Its Codification.
- Shany, Yuval, “Contract Claims v. Treaty Claims: Mapping Conflicts between
ICSID Decisions on Multisourced Investment Cases” (2005), American Journal of
International Law, Vol.99.
- Shawcross, Hartley William, “The Problems of Forein Investment in
International Law” (1961) (No. 1),Recueil Des Cours, Vol. 102.
- Sinclair, Anthony C., “The Origin of Umbrella Clauses in International Law
of Investment Protection” (2004) (No. 4), Arbitration International, Vol. 20.
- Walde, Thomas, “Umbrella Clause in Investment Arbitration” (2005)
(N.183), The Journal Of Worlde Investment & Trade, V.6.
- آرای داوری
- CMS Gas Transmission Co. v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No.
ARB/01/8, Decision on Annulment, available at: http://icsid.worldbank.org/
icsid/frontservlet, 2011/02/12.
Consortium RFCC v. Morocco, ICSID Case No. ARB/00/6, Award,
available at: http://icsid.worldbank.org/icsid/frontservlet, 2011/02/12.
 
- El Paso Energy v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No, ARB/03/15, Decision
on Jurisdiction, available at: http://icsid.worldbank.org/icsid/frontservlet,
2011/02/12.
- Eureko B.V. v. Republic of Poland, Ad Hoc Investment Treaty Case, Partial
Award, available at: http://icsid.worldbank.org/icsid/frontservlet ,2011/02/12.
- Fedex N.V. v. Republic of Venezuela, ICSID Case No. ARB/96/3, Award,
available at: http://icsid.worldbank.org/icsid/frontservlet,2011/02/12.
- Joy Minig Machinery Limited v. Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/11, Decision
on Jurisdiction, available at:http://icsid.worldbank.org/icsid/ frontservlet.
- LG & E Energy Corp. v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/1,
Decision on Liabality, available at: http://icsid.worldbank.org/icsid/
frontservlet, 2011/02/12.
- Noble Venture Inc. v. Romania, ICSID Case No. ARB/ 01/11, Award,
available at: http://icsid.worldbank.org/icsid/frontservlet,2011/02/12.
- Pan American Energy LLC v. Argentine R epublic, ICSID Case No.
ARB/03/13, Decision on Preliminary Objections, available at:
http://icsid.worldbank.org/icsid/ frontservlet,2011/02/12.
- Sempra Eergy nrnational v. Argentine, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/16, Decision
on Objections to Jurisdiction, available at: http://icsid.worldbank.org/icsid/
frontservlet,2011/02/12.
- SGS v. Islamic Republic of Pakistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/13, Decision on
Objections to Jurisdiction, available at: http:// icsid.worldbank. org/ icsid/
frontservlet,2011/02/12.
- SGS v. Republic of the Philippines, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/06, Decision
on Objections to Jurisdiction, available at: http://icsid.worldbank.org/
icsid/ frontservlet, 2011/02/12.
Public Law Researsh
Volume 16, Issue 43 - Serial Number 43
February 2015
Pages 47-80
Files
Share
How to cite
Statistics