مقاله

• نیک‌پی، امیر، «دموکراسی، جنبش اجتماعی و حقوق زنان»، مجله تحقیقات حقوقی، شماره 51، (1389).

References

Books

• Atrey, Shreya, Intersectional Discrimination (USA: Oxford University Press, 2019).
• Collins, Patricia Hill & Sirma Bilge, Intersectionality: Key Concepts (UK: Cambridge, Polity Press, 2016).
• Collins, Patricia Hill, Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment (NY: Routledge, 2002).
• European Commission, Tackling Multiple Discrimination: Practices, Policies and Laws(Brussels: DG for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities, 2007).
• Grabham, Emily, et al., eds. Intersectionality and Beyond: Law, Power and the Politics of Location (NY: Routledge, 2008).
• Hancock, Ange-Marie. Intersectionality: An Intellectual History (USA: Oxford University Press, 2016).
• MacKinnon, Catharine A, Toward a Feminist Theory of the State (USA: Harvard University Press, 1989).
• May, Vivian M, Pursuing Intersectionality, Unsettling Dominant Imaginaries (NY: Routledge, 2015).
• Razack, Sherene, Looking White People in the Eye: Gender, Race, and Culture in Courtrooms and Classrooms (Canada: University of Toronto Press, 1998).
• Sosa, Lorena, Intersectionality in the Human Rights Legal Framework on Violence against Women: At the Centre or the Margins? (UK: Cambridge University Press, 2017).
• Spelman, Elizabeth V. Inessential Woman: Problems of Exclusion in Feminist Thought (UK: Beacon Press, 1988).

Articles

• Anthias, Floya and Nira Yuval-Davis,“Contextualizing Feminism—Gender, Ethnic and Class Divisions”, Feminist Review, 15.1, (1983).
• Atrey, Shreya, “Intersectionality and Comparative Antidiscrimination Law: The Tale of Two Citadels”, Brill Research Perspectives in Comparative Discrimination Law 4, No. 1, (2020).
• Bello, Barbara Giovanna, “Multiple Discrimination between the EU Agenda and Civic Engagement: The Long Road of Intersectional Perspective”, Roma Rights Quarterly 2, (2009).
• Burri, Susanne, and Dagmar Schiek, “Multiple Discrimination in EU Law: Opportunities for Legal Responses to Intersectional Gender Discrimination”, Brussels: European Commission, (2009), available at: http://www.gender.sachsen-anhalt.de.
• Butler, Judith, “Bodies that Matter”, In Feminist Theory and the Body (NY, Routledge, 2017).
• Carbado, Devon W., et al. “Iintersectionality: Mapping the Movements of a Theory”, Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 10.2 (2013).
• Cho, Sumi, “Post-intersectionality: The Curious Reception of Intersectionality in Legal Scholarship”, Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race 10.2, (2013).
• Cho, Sumi, Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw, and Leslie McCall, “Toward a Field of Intersectionality Studies: Theory, Applications, and Praxis”, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 38.4, (2013).
• Crenshaw Kimberlé, “UN Special Rapporteur on Violence Against Women”, Background Paper for the UN Expert Meeting on the Gender-related Aspects of Race Discrimination, Zagreb, (2000), available at http://www.wicej.addr.com/wcar_docs/crensaw.tml, accessed 25 May 2005.
• Crenshaw, Kimberlé, “Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics”, Chicago Legal Forum, Vol. 140, No. 1, (1989).
• Crenshaw, Kimberle, “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color”, Stan. L. Rev,43, (1990).
• Davis, Kathy,“Intersectionality as Buzzword: A Sociology of Science Perspective on What Makes a Feminist Theory Successful”, Feminist Theory, 9.1, (2008).
• Davis, Kathy,“Intersectionality as Critical Methodology”, In Writing Academic Texts Differently: Intersectional Feminist Methodologies and the Playful Art of Writing (Routledge, 2014).
• Dhamoon, Rita Kaur, “Considerations on Mainstreaming Intersectionality”, Political Research Quarterly, 64.1, (2011).
• Hannett, Sarah, “Equality at the Intersections: The Legislative and Judicial Failure to Tackle Multiple Discrimination”, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 23.1, (2003).
• Harris, Angela P, “Race and Essentialism in Feminist Legal Theory”, Stanford Law Review, 42, (1990).
• Linda Nicholson, “Gender”, in A Companion to Feminist Philosophy, Edited by Alison M. Jaggar and Iris Marion Young (Blackwell, 2000).
• Lutz, Helma, “Intersectionality as Method”, DiGeSt, Journal of Diversity and Gender Studies, 2.1-2, (2015).
• MacKinnon, Catharine A, “Intersectionality as Method: A Note”, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 38.4, (2013).
• Makkonen, Timo, “Multiple, Compound and Intersectional /discrimination: Bringing the Experiences of the Most Marginalized to the Fore”, Åbo Akademi University, Institute for Human Rights, (2002), available at: https://tandis.odihr.pl/handle/20.500.12389/20334.
• McCall, Leslie, “The Complexity of Intersectionality”, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30.3, (2005).
• Moon, Gay, “Multiple Discrimination: Problems Compounded or Solutions Found”, Justice Journal, 3.2, (2006).
• Nikpay, Amir, “Democracy, Social Movement and Women's Rights”, Legal Research, 51, (2010). [In Persian]
• Smith, Ben, “Intersectional Discrimination and Substantive Equality: A Comparative and Theoretical Perspective”, The Equal Rights Review, 74, (2016).
• Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty, “Diasporas Old and New: Women in the Transnational World”, Textual Practice, 10.2, (1996).
• Verloo, Mieke, “Multiple Inequalities, Intersectionality and the European Union”, European Journal of Women's Studies, 13.3, (2006).
• Walby, Sylvia, Jo Armstrong, and Sofia Strid,“Intersectionality: Multiple Inequalities in Social Theory”, Sociology, 46.2, (2012).
• Yuval-Davis, Nira, “Intersectionality and Feminist Politics”, European Journal of Women's Studies, 13.3, (2006).
• Yuval-Davis, Nira, “Theorizing Identity: Beyond the ‘us’ and ‘Them’ Dichotomy”, Patterns of Prejudice, 44.3, (2010).
• Yuval-Davis, Nira, “what is’ Transversal Politics?”, Soundings -London -LAWRENCE and Wishart, (1999).

Cases

• Decision No. 16 of the Supreme Court dated 11/20/88 (with row number 12/88).
• Degraffenreid v. General Motors 413 F Supp 142 (E D Mo 1976).
• Hassam v. Jacobs, 5 S.A. 572 (2009).
• Moore v Hughes Helicopters, Inc. 708 F2d 475. (9^th Cir 1983).
• The decision of Branch 26 of the Supreme Court according to the lawsuit No. 9209970909900320 dated 5/9/1392.