نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری حقوق بین الملل دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران
2 استاد گروه حقوق عمومی و بین الملل دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران
چکیده
تفسیر معاهدات در حوزه حقوق معاهدات از اهمیت خاصی برخوردار است؛ چرا که در اغلب موارد اجرای معاهدات بدون تفسیر آن امکانپذیر نیست. علاوه بر متن و سیاق معاهده، قواعد ذیربط حقوق بینالملل از جمله اصول کلی حقوق میتواند در تفسیر معاهدات نقش مهمی ایفا کنند. معاهده، مخلوق نظام حقوقی بینالمللی میباشد و تفسیر و اجرای آن باید در سیاق نظام حقوقی حاکم بر آن صورت گیرد. پرسش اصلی مقاله این است که جایگاه اصول کلی حقوق در تفسیر معاهدات چیست؟ به نظر میرسد استفاده از اصول کلی حقوق در تفسیر معاهدات میتواند چندپارگی احتمالی در حقوق بینالملل را کاسته و انسجام در حقوق بینالملل را ارتقا دهد. در این مقاله با بهرهگیری از منابع کتابخانهای، اسناد بینالمللی و آرای قضایی و داوری بینالمللی و با استفاده از روش توصیفی – تحلیلی، جایگاه اصول کلی حقوق در تفسیر معاهدات مورد بررسی قرار میگیرد.
کلیدواژهها
- اصول کلی حقوق
- تفسیر معاهدات
- جزء ج بند 3 ماده 31 کنوانسیون حقوق معاهدات
- یکپارچگی سیستمیک
- رویه قضایی بینالمللی
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
The Role of General Principles of Law in Treaty Interpretation
نویسندگان [English]
- Mahmoud Hajjar 1
- Seyed ghasem zamani 2
1 Ph. D. Student, Public International Law, Allameh tabataba'i university, Tehran, Iran
2 Professor, Public International Law, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]
Introduction
Article 38(1)(c) of the Statute of the International Court of Justice refers to “the general principles of law recognized by civilized nations” as one of the sources of international law. A widely held view is that these general principles serve as a complementary source of international law, filling gaps in treaty and customary law to ensure that there is no absence of applicable legal rules. However, some legal scholars argue that even when no legal gap exists, general principles of law play an important role in the interpretation and application of existing rules. Therefore, while treaties and customary international law are considered the primary sources of international law, the general principles of law function as independent sources. They aid in interpreting and complementing other sources where necessary. Accordingly, the general principles play a prominent role in the interpretation of treaties. Moreover, treaties are considered one of the most important sources for regulating relations in international law and hold a special place in international law due to their stability, clarity, and accuracy in establishing obligations. However, in most cases, the implementation of treaties is not possible without interpretation. Treaty interpretation is therefore a necessary and rational process aimed at understanding the treaty’s provisions, clarifying its concept, and determining its scope. In other words, the interpretation of a treaty serves to eliminate ambiguity and uncover its precise content. The interpretation of treaties holds particular significance within the realm of treaty law. In the interpretative process, beyond the text and context of the treaty itself, relevant rules of international law—including the general principles of law—can play a crucial role. A treaty is a product of the international legal system, and its interpretation and application must be carried out within the framework of that system. The present study aimed to address the following research question: What is the role of general principles of law in treaty interpretation?
Literature Review
The general principles of law can be regarded both as a source of international law and as a tool for interpreting treaties. While there is extensive research on their role as a source of international law, their function as a tool for interpreting treaties has received far less attention. As a result, there is a noticeable gap in the literature regarding the specific focus of the present study. In this respect, this research aimed to address that gap by drawing on all relevant sources—including international jurisprudence and the work of the International Law Commission—to examine the role of general principles of law in treaty interpretation.
Materials and Methods
Using a descriptive–analytical method, the current study relied on library sources, international documents, international judicial decisions, and arbitration awards to examine the role of general principles of law in treaty interpretation.
Results and Discussion
The general rule of interpretation, set out in Article 31 of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, consists of several elements that must be considered by the interpreter in the process of interpretation. In principle, a treaty is interpreted according to the ordinary meaning of its terms. In this regard, Article 31(1) of the Vienna Convention states: “A treaty shall be interpreted in good faith in accordance with the ordinary meaning to be given to the terms of the treaty in their context and in the light of its object and purpose” (Vienna Convention, 1969) However, in some cases, the text and context of a treaty may not be sufficient to interpret its terms. In such situations, the interpreter must refer to other rules outside the treaty itself to carry out the interpretation appropriately. According to Article 31(3)(c) of the Convention, in addition to the context, “any relevant rules of international law applicable in the relations between the parties” (Vienna Convention, 1969) must also be taken into account in treaty interpretation.
Conclusion
This study concluded that the application of general principles of law as a means of interpreting treaties is grounded in Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. This view is supported by the majority of legal scholars, the International Law Commission, and international jurisprudence. International jurisprudence provides numerous examples of the use of general principles of law in treaty interpretation, many of which were analyzed in this research. Moreover, the use of general principles of law in treaty interpretation appears to contribute to reducing the potential fragmentation of international law, while promoting coherence and interaction among its various sources.
کلیدواژهها [English]
- General Principles of Law
- Treaty Interpretation
- Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties
- Systemic Integration
- International Jurisprudence
کتاب ها
- سیفی، سیدجمال، «تفسیر معاهده در زمان و قاعده حقوق میان دورهای» در جامعه بینالمللی و حقوق بینالملل در قرن 21: مجموعه مقالات اهدایی به استاد دکتر محمدرضا ضیائی بیگدلی، به اهتمام سیدقاسم زمانی، 131-141 (تهران: مؤسسه مطالعات و پژوهشهای حقوقی شهر دانش، 1395).
- شهبازی، آرامش، نظام حقوق بینالملل: وحدت در عین کثرت، چاپ دوم )تهران: موسسه مطالعات و پژوهشهای حقوقی شهر دانش، 1396(.
- ضیایی بیگدلی، محمدرضا، حقوق بینالملل عمومی، چاپ نهم و هفتادم )تهران: گنج دانش، 1400(.
- عسکری، پوریا، حقوق سرمایهگذاری خارجی در رویه داوری بینالمللی، چاپ سوم (تهران: مؤسسه مطالعات و پژوهشهای حقوق شهر دانش، 1394).
- فلسفی، هدایتالله، حقوق بینالملل معاهدات، چاپ پنجم )تهران: فرهنگ نشر نو، 1395(.
- فلسفی، هدایتالله، سیر عقل در منظومه حقوق بینالملل، چاپ دوم )تهران: فرهنگ نشر نو، 1399(.
- والاس، ربکا ام.ام. و الگا مارتینارتگا، حقوق بینالملل، ترجمه و تحقیق سید قاسم زمانی و مهناز بهراملو، چاپ چهارم )تهران: مؤسسه مطالعات و پژوهشهای حقوقی شهر دانش، 1392(.
مقالهها
- خمامی زاده، فرهاد، «تفسیر و اجرای معاهده در حقوق داخلی»، حقوق خصوصی، شماره شانزدهم، (1389).
- زمانی، سیدقاسم و شیرعلیزاده ابوالفضل، «اصول و رویه تفسیر معاهدات سرمایهگذاری بینالمللی توسط محاکم داوری و ترجیح حقوق بینالملل بر حقوق داخلی»، مجله حقوقی دادگستری، شماره 105، (1398).
- سادات اخوی، سیدعلی، «نقش رویهی بعدی دولتها در تفسیر معاهدات: نقد رأی دیوان بینالمللی دادگستری در قضیه اجرای موافقتنامه موقت 13 سپتمبر 1995»، فصلنامه مطالعات حقوق عمومی، شماره 45، (1394).
- سالاری، اسماء و صیرفی، ساسان، «نقش قواعد حقوق بینالملل در تفسیر موافقتنامههای سازمان تجارت جهانی»، دوفصلنامه دانشنامه حقوق اقتصادی، شماره 22، (1401).
- محمودی کردی، زهرا، «ماهیت اصول کلی حقوقی و کارکردهای آن در حقوق بینالملل»، مجله حقوقی بینالمللی، شماره 58، (1397).
- شهبازی، آرامش و اشرفی، کتایون، «بررسی مشروعیت تعلیق تعهدات مبتنی بر برجام توسط ایران با استفاده از هرمنوتیک تفسیر»، مجله پژوهشهای حقوقی، شماره 44، (1399).
- محبی، محسن و رضادوست، وحید، «تفسیر تکاملی معاهدات در حقوق بینالملل در پرتو قضیه اختلاف در خصوص کشتیرانی و حقوق مربوط به آن (کاستاریکا علیه نیکاراگوائه)»، مجله حقوقی بینالمللی، شماره 53، (1394).
References
Books
- Andenas Mads & Chiussi Ludovica, “Cohesin, Convergence and Cohrenceof International Law”, In General Principles and the Coherence of International Law, Edited by. Andenas Mads, Fitzmaurice Malgosia, Tanzi Attila, and Wouters Jan, 9-34 (Leiden/Boston: Brill Nijhoff, 2019).
- Crawford, James, Brownlie's Principles of Public International Law (London: Oxford University Press, 2012).
- Fitzmaurice, Malagosia & Elias, Olufemi, Contemporary Issues in the Law of Treaties (Netherlands: Eleven International Publishing, 2005).
- Gardiner, Richard k., Treaty Interpretation, 2nd (United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2015).
- Jennings, Sir Robert & Watts Sir Arthur, Oppenheim’s International Law, Ninth Ed. (London and New York: Longman, 1996).
- Klabbers Jan, “Virtuous Interpretation”, In Treaty Interpretation and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treatiea: 30 Years on”, Edited by Fitzmaurice Malgosia, Elias Olufemi, and Merkouris Panos, 17-38. (Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2010).
- Linderfalk, Ulf, On the Interpretation of Treaties (Netherlands: Springer, 2007).
- Orakhelashivili, Alexander, The Interpretation of Acts and Rules in Public International Law (United States: Oxford University Press, 2008).
- Shaw, Malcom N, International Law, Ninth Ed. (United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 2021).
- Sinclair, Sir Ian, The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 2nd (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1984).
- Thirlway, Hugh, The Sources of International Law, 2nd (London: Oxford University Press, 2019).
- Villager, Mark E., Commentary on the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2009).
Articles
- Bhat, Sumith Suresh, “A Study of the Issue of ‘Relevant Rules’ of International Law for the Purposes of Interpretation of Treaties under Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties”, International Community Law Review 21, (2019).
- Leiss, Johann R, “The the Juridical Nature of General Priciples”, in General Principles and the Coherence of International Law, edited by. Andenas Mads, Fitzmaurice Malgosia, Tanzi Attila, and Wouters Jan, 79-99. (Leiden/Boston: Brill Nijhoff, 2019).
- Lu Yu, “Analysis of the General Principles of Law of Article 38 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice”, Beijing Law Review 13, No. 4, (2022).
- Mclachlan, Campbell, “The Principle of Systemic Integration and Article 31 (3) (C) of the Vienna Convention”, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 54, 2, (2005), 279-320.
- Pellet, Alian, “Canons of Interpretation under the Vienna Convention”, In Between the Lines of the Vienna Convention?, edited by Klingler Joseph, Parkhomenko Yuri and Salonidis Constantionos, 1-12. United Kingdom, Wolters Kluwer, 2019.
Cases
- Cairn Energy PLC and Cairn UK Holdings Limited v. The Republic of India, PCA Case No. 2016-7, Award, Permanent Court of Arbitration, 21 December 2020.
- Golder v. the United Kingdom, Judgment of 21 February 1975, Series A, No. 18.
- North Sea Continental Shelf (Federal Republic of Germany v. Netherlands), ICJ Reports 1969, Separate Opinion of Judge Fouad Ammoun.
- Prosecutor v. Zoran Kupreškić et al., No. IT-95-16-T, Judgment, 14 January 2000, para. 609.
- Qustion of the Delimtation of the Continental Shelf (Nicaragua v. Colombia), Preliminary Objections, (2016) I.C.J. Reports 2016, p. 100.
- Sovereignty over Pulau Ligitan and Pulau Sipadan (Indonesia/Malaysia), Application for Permission to Intervene, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2001, p. 575, Separate opinion of Judge ad hoc Weeramantry.
- Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo in the case of Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, No. ICC-01/04-01/06, Decision on the Prosecutor’s Application for a warrant of arrest, Article 58, 10 February 2006.
- Territorial Dispute (Libya v. Chad), Merits, (1994) I.C.J. Reports 1994, p. 6.
- Total S.A. v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/04/1, Decision on liability, 27 December 2010.
- United States – Definitive Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Duties on Certain Products from China, Appellate Body Report, 11 March 2011 (WT/DS379/AB/R).
- United States – Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products, Appellate Body Report, 12 October 1998 (WT/DS58/AB/R), Dispute Settlement Reports 1998, vol. VII, p. 2755.
- United States – Tax Treatment for “Foreign Sales Corporations”, Appellate Body Report, 29 January 2002 (WT/DS108/AB/RW), Dispute Settlement Reports 2002, vol. I, p. 55.
Documents
- International Law Commission, First Report on General Principles of Law, A/CN.4/732, 2019.
- International Law Commission, Third Report on General Principles of law, A/CN.4/753, 18 April 2022.
- Report of ILC, Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law, A/CN.4/L.682 and Add.1, 13 April 2006.
- Report of ILC, report of the Study Group of The International Law Commission, Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law, A/Cn.4/L.702, 18 July 2006.
- Statute of the International Court of Justice, 18 April 1946.
- Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties 1969. Vienna, (Adopted 23 May 1969, Entered into Force 27 January 1980).
)