نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری حقوق عمومی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران
2 دانشیار گروه حقوق عمومی و بین الملل دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران
چکیده
«اصلاحناپذیری قانون اساسی» مهمترین مسئله حقوق اساسی تطبیقی معاصر و یکی از عناصر بنیادی در ساحت و ساخت «نظریه مشروطه» است که چالشهای نظری و عملی برجستهای را نیز در نظامهای حقوقی مختلف بهوجود آورده است. تأثیرگذاری اصلاحناپذیری قانون اساسی بر ارزشها، اصول و هنجارها در سه سطح «طراحی نهادی»، «نظارت قضایی» و «تعاملات سیاسی» از یکسو و برقراری نوعی توازن پایدار میان «مشروطیت» و «دموکراسی» از سوی دیگر نمایانگر بخشی از این اهمیت و چالشهای آن است. این مقاله میکوشد به دو پرسش کلیدی پاسخ دهد: «اصلاحناپذیری قانون اساسی بر چه منطق حقوقی استوار است»؟ و «چه موضوعاتی از قانون اساسی باید از بازنگری مصون بمانند»؟ پاسخ به این دو پرسش در گرو پاسخ به این پرسش پیشینی است که «اصلاحناپذیری قانون اساسی چیست»؟ یافتههای این مقاله با روش هنجاری نشان میدهد نظریه اصلاحناپذیری قانون اساسی میکوشد ضمن تفکیک ترمینولوژیک میان «بازنگری» و «اصلاح»، شناسایی ماهیت بازنگری بهمثابه «قوه مؤسِّس تبعی» و نیز خوانشی جهانشمول از مشروطیت و مآلاً ارائه «اصلاحناپذیری فراˍملی»، حدود و ثغور محدودیتهای صریح و ضمنی بر بازنگری را موجهسازی کند؛ آنچه مبتنی بر «الزام مقید اصلاحناپذیری ارزشهای مشروطه»، «جواز اصلاحناپذیری ارزشهای بینابینی» و «ممنوعیت مطلق اصلاحناپذیری ارزشهای ضدّ مشروطه» نمایان میشود.
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
An Introduction to the Theory of Constitutional Unamendability
نویسندگان [English]
- Javad Yahyazadeh 1
- Hassan Vakilian 2
1 Ph.d Student , Public Law. Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Public International Law, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]
Introduction
The concept of constitutional unamendability holds paramount significance within a constitutional framework. A constitution sets out the fundamental rules of a society, and its amendment procedures specify how those rules may be modified. In this respect, provisions on unamendability can be understood as the principles that govern how fundamental rules may be changed. As such, they constitute one of the most crucial elements of any constitution. Unamendability has drawn growing global attention and is now recognized, in both codified and uncodified forms, by numerous constitutional systems.
It operates to restrain political actors and the public from engaging in revision efforts, effectively transforming attempts to alter fundamental constitutional principles into long-term prohibitions.
Republicanism in France and Italy, human dignity in Germany and Armenia, fundamental rights in Central Africa and Brazil, secularism in Azerbaijan and Turkey, and religion in Algeria and Iran are among the many examples of unamendable constitutional principles. Constitutional unamendability, as one of the most important elements of a constitution, has increasingly captured the attention of constitutional drafters in both constitutional and even non-constitutional systems. Any theory about constitutional unamendability must address two fundamental questions.
First, what is the legal logic underlying constitutional unamendability? Second, which parts of a constitution should be considered unamendable? The concepts of unamendability as a derived constituent power and of transnational unamendability, viewed through the lens of universal constitutionalism, offer persuasive answers to these questions. Yet the precise answer to each ultimately depends on resolving a prior question: What, exactly, is constitutional unamendability? In Iran, the theoretical refinement of constitutional unamendability is particularly significant and urgent, specifically due to the emergence of a certain consensus among political actors, as well as legal and non-legal doctrines, regarding the question of constitutional revision. The present study aimed to offer a unified and consistent theory of constitutional unamendability by examining the nature of constitutional unamendability, exploring its legal logic, and presenting a normative approach regarding the unamendable content of the constitution. The analysis focused on constitutional unamendability in Iran.
Literature Review
A review of the Persian-language research reveals that scholars of constitutional law in Iran have not devoted sustained, independent attention to the theory of constitutional unamendability. Secondary sources typically offer only limited discussions of its legitimacy or illegitimacy, without undertaking a comprehensive or in-depth analysis. These works often arrive at a broad and somewhat superficial conclusion: constitutional unamendability is incompatible with democratic principles and the right to self-determination, and is therefore unacceptable. Notable examples of scholarship in this area include “The Right to Self-Determination in International Human Rights Law and Ultra-Constitutional Principles” (Mohebbi & Najafabadi, 2020) and “Theoretical Foundations of the Basic Constitutional Review” (Ghamami & Hosseini, 2019).
Materials and Methods
The present study employed a library research method for data collection and a normative method for data analysis. It was structured into three interconnected sections, each contributing to the development of a coherent theory. The first section examined the nature of constitutional unamendability. The second explored the legal logic underlying constitutional unamendability. Finally, the third section presented a normative approach regarding the unamendable content of the constitution.
Results and Discussion
The theory of constitutional unamendability seeks to legitimize the scope and limits of explicit and implicit constraints on constitutional revision by drawing a terminological distinction between revision and amendment, defining revision as an exercise of derived constituent power, and adopting a universalist understanding of constitutionalism.
This theory is expressed through three principles: a restricted obligation of unamendability for core constitutional values, the permissibility of unamendability for intermediate values, and an absolute prohibition on unamendability for anti-constitutional values. An examination of Article 177 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran showed that the Iranian legislator has effectively adopted a logic of unamendability that differs from the transnational understanding. Although the republican values enshrined in Article 177 can be interpreted—at a textual and superficial level—in a way that aligns with universal constitutionalism, the Islamic values it protects emphasize an originalist and holographic understanding of the legal and political order of the Islamic Republic, thereby reflecting an approach to unamendability that diverges from transnational unamendability.
Conclusion
The growing significance of constitutional unamendability has made it a complex and contentious mechanism for imposing constraints on constitutional revision. The theoretical and practical challenges arising at three levels—institutional design, judicial review, and political interaction—are closely tied to fundamental concepts and the emergence of new constitutional rights. As a result, it is now imperative to conceptualize constitutional unamendability in a manner that produces a theory capable of shaping constitutional thought.
A theory of constitutional unamendability must provide convincing answers to two central questions. First, it must explain the legal logic underlying constitutional unamendability. Second, it must identify which constitutional elements should be considered unamendable. Addressing these questions depends on a clear understanding of the concept of constitutional unamendability itself.
The present inquiry sought to advance the theoretical exploration of constitutional unamendability by offering integrated and coherent responses to these questions. It is feasible to establish a distinction between revision and amendment through lexical analysis and an examination of the nature, characteristics, content, and guarantees of constitutional unamendability. This can provide the conceptual foundation necessary for understanding and theorizing constitutional unamendability.
Understanding the legal logic underlying constitutional unamendability rests on recognizing constitutional amendment as a derived constituent power within the conventional theory of constitutional amendment. It further requires differentiating constituent power from constituted power and substantiating this distinction through an analysis of three major approaches: substantive, procedural, and delegated. The theory also engages with the notion of transnational unamendability, grounded in a universalist interpretation of constitutionalism, and provides justification for both explicit and implicit limits on amendment. The implications of transnational unamendability are reflected in a restricted obligation of unamendability for core constitutional values, the permissibility of unamendability for intermediate values, and an absolute prohibition on unamendability for anti-constitutional values.
کلیدواژهها [English]
- Unamendability
- Amendment
- Constitution
- Constitutionalism
- Universalis
کتابها
- احمد کسوله، عمر، «جهانشمولی حقوق بشر در مقابل تنوع فرهنگی، پاسخی از دیدگاه اسلام»، در مجموعه مقالات همایش بینالمللی مبانی نظری حقوق بشر، دانشگاه مفید قم (قم: مرکز مطالعات حقوق بشر دانشگاه مفید، 1384).
- آلبرت، ریچارد، اصلاحناپذیری قانون اساسی در نظریه و عمل، ترجمه جواد یحییزاده (تهران: مجد، 1402).
- دهخدا، علیاکبر، لغتنامه، جلدهای سوم و پنجم (تهران: دانشگاه تهران، 1377).
- صورت مشروح مذاکرات شورای بازنگری قانون اساسی جمهوری اسلامی ایران، جلد دوم (تهـران: اداره کل امور فرهنگی و روابط عمومی مجلس شورای اسلامی، 1369).
- عدل، مصطفی، حقوق اساسی یا مشروطیت دول (تهران: چشمه، 1389).
- عمید زنجانی، عباسعلی، مبانی حقوق اساسی (تهران: خرسندی، 1398).
- عمید، حسن، فرهنگ فارسی عمید (تهران: راه رشد، 1389).
- فروغی، محمدعلی، حقوق اساسی یعنی آداب مشروطیت دول (تهران: کویر، 1398).
- قاضی (شریعتپناهی)، ابوالفضل، حقوق اساسی و نهادهای سیاسی (تهران: میزان، 1400)
- گرجی ازندریانی، علیاکبر، در تکاپوی حقوق اساسی (تهران: جنگل، 1394).
- لاگلین، مارتین، مبانی حقوق عمومی، ترجمه محمد راسخ (تهران: نشر نی، 1395).
- لاگلین، مارتین، مفهوم سیاسی قانون، ترجمه محمد راسخ (تهران: نشر نی، 1403).
- لاگلین، مارتین، «نظریه مشروطه»، در محمد راسخ، حق و مصلحت: مقالاتی در فلسفه حقوق، فلسفه حق و فلسفه ارزش، جلد دوم (تهران: نشر نی، 1396).
- معین، محمد، فرهنگ معین، جلد اول (تهران: انتشارات اَدِنا، 1386).
- ویژه، محمدرضا، مبانی نظری و ساختار دولت حقوقی (تهران: جنگل، 1396).
- هارت، هربرت، مفهوم قانون، ترجمه محمد راسخ (تهران: نشر نی، 1396).
- هاشمی، محمد، حقوق اساسی و ساختارهای سیاسی (تهران: میزان، 1401).
مقالهها
- بستانی، احمد، «دو روایت از جهانشمولی حقوق بشر: نگرشی هرمنوتیک»، دو فصلنامه بینالمللی حقوق بشر، دوره 16، شماره 2، (1392).
- رنانی، محسن، «همهپرسی آخرین راهکار برای اصلاحات ساختار اقتصادی کشور است»، 15 مرداد 1403.
http://otaghiranonline.ir/news/28980
- ریزوندی، محمدامیر و همکاران، «کاوشی در تعریف نهاد: ارزیابی رویکردهای متاخر بدیل در تعریف نهاد»، برنامهریزی و بودجه، دوره 20، شماره 4، (1394).
- کدخدایی، عباسعلی، «قانون اساسی فعلی نیازمند بازنگری است»، مرداد 1403.
https://www.shora-gc.ir/fa/news/3615/
- گرجی ازندریانی، علیاکبر، «وقت بازنگری قانون اساسی فرا رسیده است»، 15 مرداد 1403.
https://www.etemadonline.com/tiny/news-413680
- غمامی محمدمهدی و حسینی حسن، «مبانی نظری امکان بازنگری بنیادین قانون اساسی»، مطالعات حقوق عمومی، دوره 50، شماره 1، (1399).
Doi: 10.22059/jplsq.2018.242729.1590.
- محبی، داود و طالب نجفآبادی، اعظم، «حق تعیین سرنوشت در حقوق بشر بینالملل و اصول فرادستوری، بررسی انتقادی اصل 177 قانون اساسی جمهوری اسلامی»، پژوهش تطبیقی حقوق اسلام و غرب، دوره 7، شماره 3، (1399).
Doi: 10.22091/csiw.2020.4867.1670.
- محلاتی، سروش، «دنیا از اصلاح قانون اساسی واهمهای ندارد»، 15 مرداد 1403.
https://www.jamaran.news/fa/tiny/news-1585334
- یاوری، اسدالله، «مطالعه تطبیقی جایگاه و اعتبار پیشبینی هنجاریهای حقوقی تغییرناپذیر در قانون اساسی»، حقوق تطبیقی، دوره 11، شماره 2، (1399).
Doi: 10.22059/jcl.2020.312290.634096
پایاننامه
- نادری، معصومه، موارد غیر قابل بازنگری قانون اساسی (مطالعه تطبیقی جمهوری اسلامی ایران و آمریکا)، پایاننامه کارشناسی ارشد حقوق عمومی دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، (1393).
References
Books
- Albert, Richard, Constitutional Amendments: Making, Breaking, and Changing Constitutions (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019).
- Ballentine, A, Ballentine’s Law Dictionary (Rochester: Lawyers Co-Op Pub Co, 1969).
- Barber, Nicholas, W, The Principles of Constitutionalism (Oxford University Press, 2018).
- Breslin, Beau, From Words to Worlds Exploring Constitutional Functionality (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009).
- Dworkin, Ronald, A Matter of Principle (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1985).
- Garner, A, Black's Law Dictionary (Minnesota: West Publishing, 2009).
- Holmes, Stephen & Sunstein, Cass, “The Politics of Constitutional Revision in Eastern Europe”, in Levinson, Sanford (ed.), Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995).
- Owdle, Michael & Wilkinson, Michael. A (ed), Constitutionalism beyond Liberalism (Cambridge University Press, 2017).
- Roznai, Yaniv, Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments: The Limits of Amendment Powers (Oxford: Oxford University Press: 2017).
- Roznai, Yaniv, “Necrocracy or Democracy? Assessing Objections to Constitutional Unamendability”, in Richard Albert, Bertil Emrah Oder (ed.), An Unamendable Constitution? Unamendability in Constitutional Democracies (Gewerbestrasse: Springer, 2018).
- Sajó, András, Limiting Government: An Introduction to Constitutionalism (Central European University Press: 1999).
- Schmitt, Carl, Constitutional Theory, Jeffrey Seitzer Translated & Edited (Durham & London: Duke University Press, 2008).
- Schwartzberg, Melissa, Democracy and Legal Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 2007).
Articles
- Albert, Richard, “Constitutional Disuse or Desuetude: The Case of Article V”, Boston University Law Reviw, 94, Issue 327, (2014).
- Albert, Richard, ‘Constructive Unamendability in Canada and the United States’, The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference, Vol. 67, (2014). https://doi.org/10.60082/2563-8505.1287.
- Albert, Richard, “Counterconstitutionalism”, Dalhousie Law Journal, Vol. 31, Issue 3, (2008).
- Albert, Richard, “Constitutional Amendment and Dismemberment”, The Yale Journal of International Law, 43, Issue 1, (2018), https:// doi. org/10.5380/rinc.v7i3.74334.
- Amir Arjomand, Saïd, “Islamic Constitutionalism”, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, Vol. 3, (2007), https:// doi. org/ 10. 1146/ annurev.lawsocsci.3.081806.112753.
- Backer, Larry, “God(s) Over Constitutions: International and Religious Transnational Constitutionalism in 21st Century”, Mississippi College Law Review, Vol. 27, Issue 1, (2008).
- BVerfGE 123, 267 – Lissabon, BverfGE 123,267 Lissabon< https:// www.servat.unibe.ch/dfr/bv123267.html,16 June 2024.
- Bernal, Carlos, “Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments in the Case Study of Colombia: An Analysis of the Justification and Meaning of the Constitutional Replacement Doctrine”, International Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 11, Issue 2, (2013), https:// doi. org/ 10. 1093/icon/mot007.
- Geertjes, Gert & Uzman, Jerfi, “Conventions of Unamendability: Covert Constitutional Unamendability in (Two) Politically Enforced Constitutions”, in Richard Albert, Bertil Emrah Oder (ed.), An Unamendable Constitution? Unamendability in Constitutional Democracies (Gewerbestrasse: Springer, 2018).
- Haller, Gret, Report on Constitutional Amendment adopted by the Venice Commission at its 81st Plenary Session (Venice, 11-12 December 2009), venice. coe. int/ webforms/ documents/? pdf= cdl-ad(2010)001-e,16 June 2024.
- Meinke, Scott & Slavery, R, “Partisanship, and Procedure in the U. S. House: The Gag Rule, 1836-1845”, Legislative Studies Quarterly, Volume 32, Issue 1, (2007),https:// org/ 10.3162/036298007X201976.
- Oxford English Dictionary, oed. com/ search/ dictionary/ ?scope =Entries&q=change, 27 July 2024.
- Oxford English Dictionary, www. oed. com/ search/ dictionary/? scope= Entries&q=adjustment, 27 July 2024.
- Perry, Adam & Ahmed, Farrah, “Constitutional Statutes”, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 37, Issue 2, (2017), https:// doi. org/ 10. 1093/ ojls/gqw030.
- Preuss, Ulrich, “The Implications of “Eternity Clauses”: The German Experience”, Israel Law Review, Vol. 44, Issue 3, (2011), https:// doi. org/ 10. 1017/S0021223700018124.
- Roznai, Yaniv & Kreuz, Leticia, “Conventionality Control and Amendment 95/2016: A Brazilian Case of Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendment”, Revista de Investigações Constitucionais, Curitiba, Vol. 5, Issue 2, (2018), https:// doi. org/ 10. 5380/ rinc. v5i2.57577.
- Roznai, Yaniv, ‘Towards a Theory of Unamendability’. NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper, Vol. 15-12, (2015), Doi:2139/ ssrn.2569292.
- Vakilian, Hassan, “Constitutional Utopianism: A Case Study of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran”, Forum Prawnicze, Vol. 6, Issue 68, (2021), Doi: 32082/fp.6(68).2021.903.
- Venter, Francois, “Utilizing Constitutional Values in Constitutional Comparison”, in Constitution and Law IV: Developments in the Contemporary Constitutional State, Konrad Adenauer Stiftung Constitution and Law: Seminar Report III (2000), Vol. 4, Issue 1, available at: https://journals. co. za/ doi/ pdf/ 10.10520/ AJA17273781_182.
- Witkowski, Zbigniew & Serowaniec, Maciej, “Eternity Clause – a Realistic or Merely an Illusory Way of Protecting the State’s Constitutional Identity?”, Toruńskie Studia Polsko-Włoskie, Vol. 17, Issue 1, (2021), http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/TSP-W.2021.012.
)