نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 حقوق بین الملل عمومی، حقوق و علوم سیاسی، تهران، تهران، ایران

2 حقوق بین الملل عمومی،حقوق و علوم سیاسی، تهران، تهران،ایران

چکیده

حکمرانی چندذینفعی جدیدترین دستاورد دکترین حقوقی در زمینه چگونگی تنظیم قواعد و مقررات حاکم بر اینترنت (بعنوان مصداق بارز فضای سایبر) است که بصورت جدی و عملیاتی از سال 2003 و با نخستین نشست اجلاس جهانی در خصوص جامعه جهانی (WSIS) مطرح و با اقبال دولت‌ها و سایر ذینفعان حوزه سایبر مواجه گردید. در واقع معماران این شکل از حکمرانی جهانی می‌کوشند با استفاده از مفاهیم و قواعد رایج در حقوق بین‌الملل به ساماندهی عرصه‌ای بپردازند که برخلاف حقوق بین‌الملل کلاسیک تنها تابعان فعال آن دیگر دولت‌ها و تاحدودی سازمان‌های بین‌المللی نیستند و این بار ذینفعانی چون گروه‌های اجتماعی(افراد) و شرکت‌های خصوصی دارای نقش و تاثیر عمده شده‌اند.
این مقاله با روش تحیلی-توصیفی به نقش و میزان تاثیرگذاری هریک از این ذینفعان در آینده حکمرانی اینترنت، بسترها و مفاهیم قابل اعمال حقوق بین‌الملل در این عرصه از قبیل حقوق نرم و سازمان‌های بین‌المللی مرتبط و در نهایت اشکالات و معایب موجود این شیوه می‌بپردازد.­­

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Multi-Stakeholder Internet Governance and International Law: Common Concepts or New Approach?

نویسندگان [English]

  • Amirsaed Vakil 1
  • Hessam Norouzpour 2

1 International Public Law, Law and Political Science, Tehran, Tehran, Iran

2 International Public Law, Law and Political Science, Tehran,Tehran,Iran

چکیده [English]

Internet Multi-stakeholder governance is the latest achievement of the legal doctrine on how to regulate the rules governing the Internet (as a clear indication of the cyberspace). After the first World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) which was held in 2003, and faced with the acceptance of governments and other stakeholders in the cyber space, it draw serious attention and became operational. In fact, the promoters of this form of global governance are striving using the common concepts and rules of international law to organize the field which unlike the classic international law its only active actors are not the governments, and to some extent, international organizations and this time, other stakeholders such as social groups (individuals) and companies have a major role and influence.
This paper uses an analytical-descriptive method to study the role and effectiveness of each stakeholders in the future of internet governance and the context, implications of applicable international law in this area, such as soft law, related international organizations and, finally, its existing problems and disadvantages.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Cyber Law
  • Multi-Stakeholder Governance
  • International Law
  • Internet
  • Soft Law
کتاب‌ها
-           احمد نقیب‌زاده، تاریخ دیپلماسی و روابط بین‌الملل (تهران: نشر قومس، 1388).
-           امیرساعد وکیل، حقوق بین‌الملل عمومی، ج 1 (تهران: انتشارات مجد،1390).
-           رضا موسی‌زاده، بایسته‌های حقوق بین‌الملل عمومی، چ5 (تهران: انتشارات میزان، 1387).
-           شاهرخ شاکریان، شناخت حقوق نرم در نظام حقوق بین‌الملل (تهران: نشر میزان،1392).
-           کدخدایی، عباسعلی، ساختار و حقوق اتحادیه اروپایی (تهران: نشر میزان،1380).
-           فلسفی، هدایت اله، حقوق بین‌الملل معاهدات (تهران: فرهنگ نشرنو،1380).
 
مقاله‌ها
-           سوئی، اریک، «تاثیر و مفهوم کنسانسوس در تدوین حقوق بین‌الملل»، ترجمه ابراهیم بیگ‌زاده، مجله تحقیقات حقوقی، شماره 10، (1371).
-           ضیایی، سیدیاسر، احسان شکیب‌نژاد، «قانونگذاری در فضای سایبر: رویکرد حقوق بین‌الملل و ایران»، مجله حقوقی بین‌المللی، دوره سی و چهارم، شماره 57، (1396).
-           ظهیری، صمد، مولوی، مهران، «دولت در نظام بین‌الملل»، فصلنامه مطالعات علوم اجتماعی، دوره 3، شماره 2، (1396).
-           شیروی، عبدالحسین، وکیلی مقدم، محمدحسین، «حقوق نرم»، حقوق تطبیقی، دوره 6، شماره 1، (1394).
 
Books
-        Benkler, Yochai, The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2006).
 -        Biegel, Stuart, Beyond Our Control? Confronting the Limits of Our Legal System in the Age of Cyberspace (Cambridge: MA: MIT Press, 2001).
 -        Cammaerts, Bart&Carpentier, Nico, The Unbearable Lightness of Full Participation in a Global Context: WSIS and Civil Society Participation”, in Towards a Sustainable Information Society: Beyond WSIS, eds. Jan Servaes and Nico Carpentier (2004) (Bristol: Intellect, 2004).
 -        Cutler, Claire, Private Power and Global Authority: Transnational Merchant Law in the Global Political Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge Studies in International Relations, 2003).
 -        Cutler, Claire, The Emergence of Private Authority in Global Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).
 -        DeNardis, Laura, The Global War for Internet Governance (New York: Yale University Press, 2016).
 -        Doria, Avri, “Use [and Abuse] of Multistakeholderism in the Internet” in (eds): Roxana Radu, Jean-Marie Chenou& Weber, Rolf H, The Evolution of Global Internet GovernancePrinciples and Policies in the Making (Berlin, Springer, 2014).
 -        Drake, W.J. &Price, M., (Eds.), Beyond NETmundial: The Roadmap for Institutional Improvements to the Global Internet Governance Ecosystem, 2014, available at: www. global. asc. upenn. edu/ app/ uploads/ 2014/08/ BeyondNETmundial_FINAL.pdf, (Accessed September 2018).
 -        Dupuy, R.J., ‘Declaratory Law and Programmatory Law: From Revolutionary Custom to ‘Soft Law’, in R.A. Akkerman, P.J. Krieken and C.O. Pannenborg (Eds.), Declaration on Principles (Leyden: Leyden, 1977).
 -        Flyverbom, Mikkel, The Power of Networks: Organizing the Global Politics of Internet (London: Cheltenham, 2011).
 -        Franklin, Marianne I., Digital Dilemmas, Power, Resistance, and the Internet (London: Oxford, 2013).
-        Hart, H.L.A., The Concept of Law, 2nd ed (London: Oxford, 1977).
 -        Jorgensen, Rikke Frank, Framing the Net. The Internet and Human Rights (London, Cheltenham, 2013).
 -        Kleinwachter, W., Internet Principle Hype: How Soft Law is Used to Regulate the Internet [online], 2011. Available from: http://news.dot-nxt.com/2011/07/27/inter net-principle-hype-anon (Accesses July 2018).
 -        Kulesza, Joanna, International Internet Law (London: Rutledge Research in Information Technology and E-Commerce Law, 2012).
-        Lepard, Briand, Customary International Law: ANew Theory with Practical Applications (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).
 -        Libicki, Martin C, Crisis and Escalation in Cyberspace (Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2012).
 -        Lipschutz, Ronnie D&Judith Mayer, Global Civil Society and Global Environmental Governance, (New York: Suny Press, 1996).
 -        Malcolm, Jeremy, Multi-Stakeholder Governance and the Internet Governance Forum (Atlanta: Terminus Press, 2008).
 -        Ostrom, Elinor, Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).
 -        Risse, T., (ed.), Governance without a State? Policies and Politics in Areas of Limited Statehood (New York: Columbia University Press, 2010).
 -        Senn, M., Non-State Regulatory Regimes, Understanding Institutional Transformation, (Berlin: Springer, 2011) Malcolm, Jeremy, Multi-Stakeholder Governance and the Internet Governance Forum (Atlanta: TERMINUS PRESS, 2008).
 -        Wagner, Mueller, M., B., Finding a Formula for Brazil: Representation and Legitimacy in Internet Governance, Internet Policy Observatory (blog), 2014, available at: http:// www. internetgovernance. org/ wordpress/ wp-content/ uploads/MiltonBenWPdraft_Final_clean2.pdf. (Accessed September2018).
 -        Weber, R., Principles for governing the Internet: A comparative analysis, Paris: UNESCO, 2016, Available at: http:// unesdoc. unesco. org/ images/ 0023/ 002344/234435e.pdf, (Accessed September 2018).
 -        Weber, Rolf H, Regulatory Models for the Online World (Zurich: Springer, 2002).
 
Articles
 -        Abbott, K.W, Snidal, D., “Hard and Soft law in International Governance”, International Organization, Vol. 54, (2000).
 -        Annan, Kofi, “Globalization operates on Internet time”, www. un. org/ press/en/2000/20000726.sgsm7495 .doc.html, (accessed August 2018), (2000).
 -        Barr, M.S and Miller, G.P., “Global Administrative Law: the View from Basel”, The European Journal of International Law, Vol. 17, (2006).
 -        Brummer, C., “How International Financial Law Works (and how it doesn’t)”, Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 99, (2011).
 -        Campbell, A, “Self-regulation and the Media”, Federal Communications Law Journal, Vol. 51, (1999).
 -        Drake, William J., “Multistakeholderism: Internal Limitations and External Limits”, MIND, No. 2, (2011).
 -        Dutton, William H. and Peltu, Malcolm, “The Emerging Internet Governance Mosaic: Connecting the Pieces”, Information Polity, No. 12, (2007).
-        Hofmann, J., “Multi-stakeholderism in Internet Governance: Putting a Fiction into Practice”, Journal of Cyber Policy, 1, 1.http://news.cnet.com/A-battle-for-the-soul-of-the-Internet/2010-1071 _3-5737647.html. (Accessed September 2018) (2016).
 -        James, Lewis, “Liberty, Equality, Connectivity: Transatlantic Cybersecurity Norms,” Center for Strategic & International Studies, No. 141, (2014).
 -        Jensen, Darryn M., “The Transformation of International Law”, Policy, Vol. 20: No. 1, (2004).
 -        Klein, Wächter, “Global Governance in the Information Age: GBDe and ICANN as”Pilot Projects”, for Co-regulation and a New Trilateral Policy?” development, Vol. 46, (2003).
 -        Liddicoat, J., Doria, A., “Human Rights and Internet Protocols”, available in: https://www.internetsociety.org/sites/default/files/Human%20Rights%20and%20Internet%20Protocols-%20Comparing%20Processes%20and%20Principles.pdf, (2012), (Accessed August 2018).
 -        Malcolm, J., “Criteria of Meaningful Stakeholder Inclusion in Internet Governance”, Internet Policy Review, Vol.4, No. 4, (2015).
 -        Milan, Stefania, “Civil Society Participation Beyond Smoke and Mirrors: An Assessment of Multi-Stakeholder Mechanisms in Cyberspace Governance,” (Working Paper for the Global Governance Reform Initiative Project of the Hague Institute for Global Justice), Policy Brief, No.17, (2015).
 -        Musiani, F., “WSIS+10: The Self-praising Feast of Multi-stakeholderism in Internet Governance”, Internet Policy Review, Vol. 2, No. 2, available at: http://policyreview.info/articles/(Accessed September 2018), (2013).
 -        Noss, Elliot, “Perspective: A battle for the Soul of the Internet,”available at: zdnet.com/article/a-battle-for-the-soul-of-the-internet, (2005).
 -        Siganda, W., “Internet Governance and Capacity Building: AView from the Developing World”, In: Internet Policy Making (Collaborator Discussion Paper Series No.1), Multistakeholder Internet Dialogue (MIND) 1, Vol. 2, (2011).
 -        Smann, Peter, “The Future of the WTO: From Authoritarian ‘Mercantilism’ to Multilevel Governance for the Benefit of Citizens?’ Asian Journal of WTO and International Health Law and Policy, Vol. 6, (2015).
 -        Souter, D, “Inside the Information Society: The What and Why of Multistakeholder Participation” APC (blog), available at: https:// www. apc. org/ en/node/22446/, (Accessed Aguste 2018), (2017).
 -        Souter, David G., “Whose Information Society? Developing Country and Civil Society Voices in the World Summit on the Information Society”, available in: !URL: http://rights.apc.org/ documents/wsis_EN.pdf, (2009).
 -        Spier, Raymond E., “‘Dual Use’ and ‘Intentionality’: Seeking to Prevent the Manifestation of Deliberately Harmful Objectives”, Sci. Eng. Ethics16, (2010).
 -        W.A. Meier, & I.Perrin, “Media Concentration and Media Governance”, Communication, Vol. 32, (2017).
 -        Weber, Rolf H., “Shift of Legislative Powers and Multi-stakeholder Governance”, Int. J. Public Law and Policy, Vol. 1, No. 1, (2011).
 -        Weber, Rolf H., “Transparency and the Governance of the Internet”, Computer Law & Security Report, Vol. 24, (2008).
 -        Wu, Tim and Dyson, Esther, Michael Froomkin, and Gross David, “On the Future of Internet Governance”, Amer. Soc. IL Proc, 101, (2007).
 -        Zimmermann, Andreas, “International Law and ‘Cyber Space”, European Soc. International 7Law Reflections 3, (2014).