پژوهش حقوق عمومی

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

اخبار و اعلانات

هزینه داوری و چاپ

همه داوران

داوران سال 1398

داوران سال 1399

داوران سال 1400

داوران سال 1401

مفهوم، منزلت و صور برابری در ادبیات بین المللی حقوق زنان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

استادیار حقوق بین‌الملل عمومی دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان، کرمان، ایران

چکیده

گاهی تجربه زنان، معجون تلخی از حاشیه‌نشینی، خشونت و سلطه فرهنگی است. برای مواجۀ اخلاقی با این وضعیت، یکی از رهیافت‌ها برابری است، اما این مفهوم به‌واسطۀ متن‌باز بودن، مدلول و مَرتَبت آن محمل منازعه است. برابری هم مفهومی توصیفی است و هم هنجاری، در هیئتِ یک مفهوم توصیفی، رابطه‌ای است وصفی میان دو فرد که از برخی جهات همانند می‌باشند. در معنای هنجاری که به عالم اعتبار تعلق دارد و تجویز رفتار خاص با همه است، مرتبط است با درک ما از آنچه باید باشد و مبتنی است بر ارزش مورد پیگیری که غالباً «عدالت» است. در حقوق بین‌الملل، از میان سه گفتمان برابری (قابلیت‌ها، حق و سرمایه انسانی) گفتمان حق در قالب قواعد اولیه حقوق بین‌الملل و از طریق معاهدات، عرف و رویه قضایی که منابع صوری این نظام حقوقی می‌باشند مورد شناسایی قرار گرفته است. اما نتوانسته در منابع واقعی حقوق بین‌الملل و قواعد ثانویه آن عینیت بیابد. در این پژوهش با رویکرد توصیفی- تحلیلی برابری در جایگاه یک اصل کلی حقوقی، اشکال ماهوی، شکلی و تحولی آن و نسبت آن با مفاهیم تبعیض، تفاوت، عاملیت،توانمندسازی و جایگاه آن در میان قواعد اولیه و ثانویه حقوق بین‌الملل بررسی می‌شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Concept, Status, and Models of Equality in the International Literature on Women’s Rights

نویسنده [English]

  • ata allah salehi

Assistant Professor, Public International Law, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran

چکیده [English]

Sometimes the experience of women is an unpleasant combination of marginalization, violence and cultural domination. To ethically encounter with this situation, one approach is equality; however, its content is controversial due to its open source text. Equality is a descriptive concept, and normative; within the form of a descriptive concept, it refers to a descriptive relationship between two individuals who are similar in some respects. In the normative sense, that belongs to the world of credit and prescribes a particular behavior to all, it is related to our understanding of what should be and is based on desired value which is often "justice". In international law, among the three discourses of equality (capabilities, rights and human capital), the rights is recognized in the framework of the primary rules and through treaties, custom and judicial procedures, which are the formal sources of this legal system, but fails in the actual sources of international law and its secondary rules .This research, by descriptive-analytic approach, shows equality as a legal general principle; its forms, and its relation to the concepts such as discrimination, difference, agency, empowerment and investigates its position among the primary and secondary rules of international law.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Gender Equity
  • Human Rights
  • Women
  • International law
  • Justice
مراجع
برناردی، برونو، مردم‌سالاری در تاریخ اندیشه غرب، ترجمه عباس باقری، چاپ اول (تهران: نشر نی، 1382).
 - دال، رابرت آلن، درباره برابری سیاسی، ترجمه معینی جهانگیر معینی علمداری (تهران: فرهنگ صبا، 1387).
- رالز، جان، عدالت به‌مثابه انصاف یک بازگویی، ترجمه عرفان ثابتی، چاپ چهارم (تهران: ققنوس، 1383).
- قانون مدنی ایران.
 
ب- انگلیسی
Books
-Aristotle, Politics, Translated by Benjamin Jowett (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1952).
 
- Capaldi, Nicholas, The Meaning of Equality, in Liberty and equality, edited by Tibor R. Machan (Stanford: Hoover Institution Press, 2002).
 
- Holtmaat, Rikki, The CEDAW: A Holistic Approach to Women's Equality and Freedom (Cambridge: University Press, 2013)
 
- Hopkins, Anthony, Equality before the Law: The Importance of Understanding the Experience of 'others' in the Criminal Justice System (Australia: University of Canberra, 2015).
 
- Kelsen, Hans, What is Justice? Law and Politics in the Mirror of Science (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1971).
 
- Kreider, David, Isonomia: The Greek Idea of Freedom (United States: The University of Montana, 1973).
 
- Kymlicka, Will, Contemporary Political Philosophy, An Introduction (United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2002).
 
- Lahdenperä, Jori, The Importance of equality (Sweden: Mälardalen University, 2012).
 
- Lauterpacht, Hersch, An International Bill of the Rights of Man (New York: Columbia University Press, 1945)
 
- Pogge, Thomas, World Poverty and Human Rights (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2002).
 
- Rae, Douglas, Equalities (Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1981).
 
- Rawls, John , A Theory of Justice, (Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1999).
 
- Rights of Women organization, From Rights to Action: Using International Rights and Mechanisms on Violence against Women in the UK (London: Rights of Women Organization, 2011).
 
- Sen, Amartya, Equality of What? In: McMurrin S Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Volume 1. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980).
 
- Bulley, Sokhi, Baldeep, Non-Discrimination and Difference: The (Non-) Essence of Human Rights Law (Nottingham: Human Rights Law Centre, 2005).
 
- Tridimas, Takis, The General Principles of EU Law, Third Edition (United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2007).
 
- Li, Weiwei, Equality and Non-Discrimination UnderInternational Human Rights Law (Norway: University of Oslo, 2004).
 
- Zajadlo, Jerzy, The Idea of Equality in Modern Legal Philosophy, In The Principle of Equality as a Fundamental Norm in Law and Political Philosophy (Poland: University of Lodz Press, 2017).
 
Articles
-            Facio, Alda and Morgan, Martha I, “Equity or Equality for Women? Understanding CEDAW’s Equality Principles”, IWRAW Asia Pacific Occasional Paper Series, No. 14, (2009), http://www.iwraw-ap.org/publications/doc/OPS14_Web.pdf.
 
-            Fredman, Sandra, “Beyond the Dichotomy of Formal and Substantive Equality. Towards New Defnitions of Equal Rights”, in I. Boerefijn et al., eds., Temporary Special Measures, Antwerp Belgium: Intersentia, (2003).
 
-            Gail Hershatter, Emily Honig, & Lisa Rofel, “Reflections on the Fourth World Conference on Women”, Beijing and Huairou, Social justice, Vol. 23, No. 1/2, (1996).
 
-            krsticevic, Viviana, “Gender Equality in International Tribunals and Bodies”, (2015), https:// www.cejil.org/sites/default/files/gqual_english.pdf.
 
-            Huis, Marloes A, Nina Hansen, Sabine Otten & Robert Lensink, “A Three-Dimensional Model of Women’s Empowerment: Implications in the Field of Microfinance and Future Directions”, Frontiers in Psychology,No8. (2017).
 
-            MacNaughton, Gillian, “Untangling Equality and Non-discrimination to Promote the Right to Health Care for All”, Health and Human Rights Journal, (2009).
 
-            McCrudden Christopher, “The New Concept of Equality”, ERA F.No 3, (2003), http://www.era.int/web/en/resources/5_1095_2954_file_en.4194.pdf).
 
-            Nussbaum, Martha C, “Capabilities as Fundamental Entitlements: Sen and Social Justice”, Discussion Paper 56, Center for Intergenerational Studies, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University, (2002).
 
-            Plous, Scott, “The Psychology of Prejudice, Stereotyping, and Discrimination: An Overview”in Scott Plous (ed) Understanding Prejudice and Discrimination, New York, McGraw-Hill, (2003).
 
-            Preuss, Ulrich K. “Equality of States - Its Meaning in a Constitutionalized Global Order”, Chicago Journal of International Law: Vol. 9: No. 1, (2008),
https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cjil/vol9/iss1/3.
 
-            Gosepath, Stefan, “Equality”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.). (2011), https://plato.stanford.edu/ archives/spr2011/ entries/equality/.
 
Documents
- CCPR, General Comment No. 4: Article 3, 1981.
-CEDAW Committee, 2010, General Recommendation No. 28: The Core Obligations of States Parties under Article 2 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women.
-Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, 2000.
-Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), 1979.
-Fourth World Conference on Women, Beijing, China, Sept. 4–15, 1995, Beijing Platform for Action, Un, doc, A/CONF. 177/20. http:// www. un. org/ womenwatch/ daw/ beijing/platform.
-Human Rights Committee, General Comment, No. 18: Non-discrimination.
-ILO Convention No. 111, Discrimination (Employment and Occupation) Convention, 1958.
- Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, “Gender stereotypes and Stereotyping and women’s Rights”, Geneva, 2014.
- OSAGI, Supporting gender mainstreaming, March 2001. http:// www. un. org/ womenwatch/ osagi/ pdf/ report.pdf.
- Special Rapporteur to the UN Sub-Commission on Human Rights, Study of the Current Dimensions of the Problems of Intolerance and of Discrimination on the Grounds of Religion or Belief, 31 August 1986,E/CN.4/Sub.2/1987/26.
- UNESCO’s Gender Mainstreaming Implementation Framework, 2003.
- Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948.
- UN Women, Research and Data Section, Gender Equity and Human Rights, 2015.
- WHO, Promoting gender equality to prevent violence against women, 2009.
 
Cases
- PCIJ, Advisory Opinion, Series A/B. 64,( 1935).
-ICJ Reports 1962, 318 (1st phase) and ICJ Reports 1966, 4 (2nd phase).
-ICJ Reports, 1971, Namibia Case, and Advisory Opinion, 131, (1962).
- European Court of Human Rights, Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v The United Kingdom, Application nos. 9214/80, 9473/81 and 9474/81,( 28 May 1985).
 
پژوهش حقوق عمومی
دوره 22، شماره 68
مهر 1399
صفحه 325-359
فایل ها
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار