نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشیار حقوق عمومی دانشکده حقوق دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران
2 دانشجوی دکتری حقوق عمومی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
The State in the general sense is competent to make binding decisions to protect the public interest, on behalf of the people in response to the events of social life. One of the issues that governments have responded in the last two centuries in various forms such as lawmaking, adoptions of economic policies and the issuance of judicial rulings has been economic crises. Given the impact of judicial rulings on resource allocation and the effectiveness of government economic policies and its constructive role in achieving the rule of law, it is important to provide an analysis of the fluctuations and characteristics of judicial rulings in times of significant economic crisis; Therefore, in this article, by examining the rulings of the Court of Administrative Justice during the currency crisis of the 1990s and the current economic crisis in Iran, it is intended to provide an appropriate analysis for the above question. The results of these studies indicate that in times of economic crisis, the performance of the Administrative Court of Justice is very significant and this issue is due to the excessive intervention of executive bodies through overregulation. The Administrative Court of Justice is also negligent for not considering the fact that the occurrence of economic crisis is the main cause of overregulation.
کلیدواژهها English
کتابها
مقالهها
References
Books
- Ball, Howard, Hugo L. Black; Cold Steel Warrior (New York: OUP, 1996).
- Boyer, Paul S., American History: A Very Short Introduction (New York: OUP, 2012).
- Contiades, Xenophon, Constitutions in the Global Financial Crisis, A Comparative Analysis (London: Ashgate Pub, 2013).
- Cushman, Barry, Rethinking the New Deal Court; The Structure of the Constitutional Revolution (New York: OUP, 1998).
- Garner, Bryan A., Black's Law Dictionary (Tehran: Thomson West Pub, 2004).
- Heale, M. J., Franklin D. Roosevelt; The New Deal and War (London: Routledge, 1999).
- Levy, Robert A. and William Mellor, The Dirty dozen; How Twelve Supreme Court Cases Radically Expanded Government and Eroded Freedom (Washington: Cato institute, 2009).
- McCloskey, Robert G., The American Supreme Court (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2010).
- Rauchway, Eric, The Great Depression and the New Deal: A Very Short Introduction (New York: OUP, 2008).
- Stijn Claessen, and Kose M. Ayhan, Financial Crises: Explanations, Types, and Implications, (London: IMF, 2013).
Articles
- Bieneman, Charles A., “Legal Interpretation and a Constitutional Case; Home Building & Loan Ass'n v. Blaisdell”, Michigan Law Review, 90, (1992).
- Dam, Kenneth, W., “From the Gold Clause Cases to the Gold Commission: A Half Century of American Monetary Law”, University of Chicago Law Review, 504, (1983).
- Evaldas Racickas and Asta Vasiliauskaite, “Classification of Financial Crises and Their Occurrence Frequency in Global Financial Markets”, Social Research, (29), (2012).
- Lash, Kurt, “The Constitutional Convention of 1937: The Original Meaning of the New Jurisprudential Deal”, Fordham Law Rev, 70, (2001).
- Lindsay Matthew J. “In Search of Laissez-Faire Constitutionalism”, Harvard Law Review Forum, 123, (2010).
- Lindsay Matthew J., “The Presumptions of Classical Liberal Constitutionalism”, Iowa Law Review, 102, (2017).
Cases