الف- فارسی
کتاب‌ها
- فلاح زاده، علی محمد، (1394)، حقوق اداری تطبیقی، تهران: انتشارات شهر دانش.
- هایک، فردریش، (1395)، راه بردگی، ترجمه فریدون تفضلی و حمید پاداش، چاپ سوم، تهران: نشر نگاه معاصر.
- هداوند، مهدی، (1389)، حقوق اداری تطبیقی، جلد اول، تهران: انتشارات سمت.
مقاله‌ها
- زارعی، محمدحسین، (1376)، «تحلیلی از پیوند حقوق اداری و مدیریت دولتی بر پایه حاکمیت قانون»، نشریه مدیریت دولتی، پاییز و زمستان، دوره 11، شماره 3.
- فلاحزاده، علیمحمد، (1396)، «اصل بیان دلایل و مستندات آرا و تصمیمات اداری و انعکاس آن در رویه قضایی دیوان عدالت اداری»، مجله پژوهش حقوق عمومی، بهار، دوره 18، شماره 54.
- قاری سید فاطمی، سید محمد، و فلاح زاده، علی محمد، (1393)، «عدالت رویهای و تکلیف به بیان دلایل تصمیمات اداری: رویکردی حق بنیاد»، مجله تحقیقات حقوقی، ویژه نامه شماره 10.
ب- انگلیسی
Books
- Allan, Trevor, (1998), “Procedural Fairness and the Duty of Respect”, in: Oxford Legal Studies, Vol. 18.
- Kornblith, Hilary, (2002), Knowledge and Its Place in Nature, Oxford: Clarendon Press, especially chapter 3.
- Levine, James P, (1991), Juries and Politics (Contemporary Issues in Crime and Justice), Brooks/Cole Publishing.
- Pettit, Philip, (1997), Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Stein, Peter, (1966), Regulae Iuris: from Juristic Rules to Legal Maxims, Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press
Articles
- Adams, Brian E, (2014), “Reason-Giving In Deliberative Forums”, in: Journal of Public Deliberation, Vol. 10: Iss. 2, Article 6. Available at: http:// www. publicdeliberation. net/ jpd/ Vol.10/iss2/art6.
- Alexy, Robert and Aleksander Peczenik (1990), “The Concept of Coherence and Its Significance for Discursive Rationality”, in: Ratio Juris, Vol. 3.
- Amaya, Amalia, (2013), “Coherence, Evidence and Legal Proof’, in: Legal Theory, Columbia University Press, Vol. 19, Issue 1.
- Bingham, RT Hon Lord Justice, (1988), “Reasons and Reasons for Reasons: Differences between a Court Judgment and an Arbitration Award”, in: Arbitration International, Vol. 4.
- Brooke, John L, (1998), “Reason and Passion in the Public Sphere: Habermas and the Cultural Historians”, in: Journal of Interdisciplinary History, Vol. 29 (1).
- Carbonell, Flavia, (2011), “Coherence and Post-sovereign Legal Argumentation”, in: Agustin Jose Mendez and John Erik Fossum (eds.), Law and Democracy in: Neil MacCormeik’s Legal and Political Theory (The Post Sovereign Constellation), Springer, Chapter 9.
- Craig, Paul. P, (1997), “Formal and Substantive Conceptions of the Rule of Law: An Analytical Framework”, in: Public Law, available at: weblaw.haifa.ac.il/en/ Judges Academy/workshop3/Documents/A/A/PL-Craig.pdf.
- Eliot, Mark, (2012), “Has the Common Law Duty to Give Reasons Come of the Age”, in: Legal Studies Research, University of Cambridge, and Paper No. 7 /2012, available at:
http://ssrn.com/abstract=2041362.
- Elster, Jon, (1998), “Deliberation and Constitution Making”, in Jon Elster (ed.), Deliberative Democracy, NewYork: Cambridge University Press.
- Fuller, Lon L. (1958), “Positivism and Fidelity to Law—A Reply to Professor Hart”, in: Harvard Law Review, Vol. 71.
- Goldman, Alvin I, (1994), “Argumentation and Social Epistemology”, in: The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 91.
- Kant, Immanuel, (1784), “Idea for a Universal History from a Cosmopolitan Point of View”, in: Lewis White Beck (ed.), On History, translated by Lewis White Beck, Robert E. Anchor and Emil L. Fackenheim, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, Fourth Thesis.
- Kress, Kenneth J, (1984), “Legal Reasoning and Coherence Theories: Dworkin’s Rights Thesis, Retroactivity, and the Linear Order of Decisions”, in: California Law Review, Vol. 72. Available at: http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/ californialawreview/ vol72/iss3/3.
- Lindquist, Stefanie A. and Frank C. Cross (2010), “Stability, Predictability and the Rule of Law: Stare Decisis as Reciprocity Norm”, Available at: https:// law. utexas. edu/ conferences/ measuring/The%20Papers/Rule%20of %20Law%20Conference. crosslindquist. pdf.
- Lovett, Frank, (2001), “Domination: A Preliminary Analysis,” in: The Monist, Vol. 84.
- Mashaw, Jerry L, (2007), “Reasoned Administration: The European Union, the United States, and the Project of Democratic Governance”, in:
Yale Law School Legal Scholarship Repository, Faculty Scholarship, Paper 1179, available at:
http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/1179.
- Matthew D. McCubbins et al, (1987), “Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control”, in: Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 3.
- Montpetit, Éric, (2005), “Westminster Parliamentarism, Policy Networks, and the Behaviour of Political Actors”, in: Andre Lecours (ed.), New Institutionalism: Theory and Analysis, University of Toronto Press, available at: www.jstor.org/stable/ 10.3138/9781442677630.18.
- Mureinik, Etienne (1994), “A Bridge to Where? Introducing the Interim Bill of Rights”, in: South Africa Journal of Human Rights, Vol. 10.
- Onishi, Norimitsu, “Japan Learns Dreaded Task of Jury Duty”, in: NY Times, July 16, 2007.
- Pettit, Philip (2000), “Democracy, Electoral and Contestatory,” in: Ian Shapiro and Stephen Macedo (eds.), Designing Democratic Institutions, Nomos XLII, London and New York: New York University Press.
- Ronald Dworkin (1984), “Rights as Trumps”, in: Jeremy Waldron (ed.), Theories of Rights, Oxford University Press.
- Stalnaker, Robert (1973), “Presupositions”, in: Journal of Philosophical Logic, Vol. 2.
- Staszewski, Glen (2012), “Reason-Giving and Accountability”, in: Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 93, available at: http:// www. minnesotalawreview. org/wp-content/ uploads/ 2012/ 01/ Staszewski_MLR.pdf.
- Visram, Alnashir (2010), “Review of Administrative Decisions of Government by Administrative Courts and Tribunals”, 10th Congress of the International Association of Supreme Administrative Jurisdictions (Sydney – March 2010).
- Waldron, Jeremy (2008), “The Concept and the Rule of Law”
, in:
Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series, Working Paper NO. 08-50, New York University School of Law. Electronic copy available at:
http://ssrn.com/abstract=1273005.
)