نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری حقوق بین الملل دانشگاه پیام نور. تهران. ایران
2 استادیار گروه حقوق دانشگاه پیام نور. تهران. ایران
3 استاد علوم سیاسی دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران
4 دانشیار گروه حقوق دانشگاه پیام نور. تهران. ایران
چکیده
یکی از دغدغه‌های حامیان حقوق بشر در دو قرن اخیر، حمایت از حقوق زنان بوده است. تلاش‌های بین‌المللی منجر به رسمیت شناخته شدن اصل منع تبعیض جنسیتی در شماری از اسناد مرکزی حقوق بشری و بطور خاص کنوانسیون رفع کلیه اشکال تبعیض علیه زنان گردیده است. اما گزارشات کمیته رفع تبعیض از کشورهای عضو حاکی از آن است که بسیاری دولت‌ها از جمله دولت‌های اسلامی، التزام چندانی به مقررات آن نداشته‌اند. لذا بررسی مفاهیم حوزه تبعیض جنسیتی و مقررات کنوانسیون خصوصاً از جهت امکان‌سنجی اجرای آنها در جوامعی که از هنجارهای فرهنگی و مذهبی متفاوتی برخوردارند اهمیت دارد. این تحقیق با شیوه توصیفی- تحلیلی و با روش کتابخانه‌ای به دنبال ارائه پاسخ به این پرسش است که «کنوانسیون رفع تبعیض علیه زنان چه رویکردی به هنجارهای حاکم بر جوامع دارد و ملاحظات شریعت اسلامی چه الگوی حقوقی را برای ارائه در حقوق داخلی و در چهارچوب کنوانسیون می‌طلبد؟». لذا پس از بررسی اختصاری مفاهیم بنیادی حوزه برابری جنسیتی، به نقد مقررات کنوانسیون 1979 و تبیین چیستی و چرائی کاستی‌های این سند پرداخته شده است. سپس محورهای اصلی تعارض مقررات کنوانسیون با هنجارهای حاکم بر جوامع اسلامی مورد بررسی قرار گرفته و الگوهایی برای فائق آمدن بر آنها ارائه شده است.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
A Critical Study of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women: A Proposal for an Islamic Model
نویسندگان [English]
- Hojatollah Mansouri 1
- Soheyla Koosha 2
- Mohammadreza Hatami 3
- Hossein Alkajbaf 4
1 Ph.D Student, International Law, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor Law Department, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran
3 Professor, Political Sciences, Payame Noor Univerity, Tehran, Iran
4 Associate Professor, Law Depatrment, Payame Noor University. Tehran. Iran
چکیده [English]
Introduction
Protecting women’s rights has been a perennial concern of human rights advocates over the past two centuries. Their dedicated efforts have resulted in the recognition of gender equality in key human rights documents such as the Charter of the United Nations, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. However, these documents alone have fallen short of achieving the anticipated goals in promoting gender equality. This gap prompted the drafting of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) to address gender discrimination in the member states. However, reports from the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women reveal that many member states have not fully complied with the provisions of CEDAW. This failure has raised doubts about the effectiveness of CEDAW in safeguarding women’s rights. On one hand, some states have entered reservations to specific provisions of the Convention; on the other hand, there appears to be a lack of binding mechanisms to hold them accountable for violating their obligations. It is thus crucial to re-evaluate the fundamental concepts of gender discrimination and the provisions of CEDAW in order to examine their feasibility in societies with different norms. CEDAW consists of 30 succinct articles aimed at eliminating all forms of discrimination against women in all societies, regardless of cultural, religious, or ethnic differences. However, it does not explicitly address specific religious or cultural norms, presenting only a universal solution that may not align with diverse contextual complexities. Consequently, several member states, including secular and Islamic ones (e.g., India, Pakistan, and Indonesia), encounter challenges in implementing the provisions. The challenges apparently stem from CEDAW’s emphasis on individualism, which overlooks communal concerns and requirements. Predictably, this approach, coupled with affirmative action favoring women, has sparked backlash against the status of women, even in the U.S. and Europe. In this respect, the present study tried to address the following research questions: What approach does CEDAW take towards the norms governing different societies? And what legal model does Islamic Sharia require to be applied in the domestic legal system, particularly within the framework of CEDAW? The research is based on the hypothesis that the effectiveness of CEDAW can be criticized in terms of normative frameworks and legal guarantees for enforcement.
Materials and Methods
As a qualitative inquiry, the present study used a descriptive–analytical method as well as library resources to examine the contemporary approaches of states toward gender equality. To achieve the objective, the study analyzed about 40 primary and secondary documents and sources, including books, journal articles, reports, etc.
Results and Discussion
The study focused on the needs and interests of involved entities, namely the member states, individual members of societies, and particularly women. The examination of the foundational concepts concerning gender equality and the provisions of CEDAW helped gain insight into the overall approach of the document towards cultural and religious norms governing different societies. CEDAW advocates for women’s rights by promoting equality between men and women in society, regardless of their distinctive roles and status within the family and broader community. Consequently, it does not explicitly address equality of rights in terms of equity or in a just or fair manner. Rather, its focus is on placing men and women in the same, equivalent positions. Furthermore, CEDAW does not explicitly refer to norms. Instead, it calls upon the member states to “modify the social and cultural patterns of conduct of men and women.” This approach can be characterized as somewhat abstract and vague, resembling radical individualism or even libertinism. However, many secular and Islamic states possess diverse social and cultural norms, customs, and taboos regarding the individual and social rights of women. Moreover, the teachings of religious leaders and traditional attitudes are heavily influenced by communitarianism. A notable example can be found in the teachings of Imam Ali, who approves or condemns personal behaviors based on their potential impact on society as a whole. Indeed, he strongly advocates for cultural reforms without any prejudice, recognizing the necessity for change when it serves the greater good.
It is worth noting that some countries, such as the Islamic republic of Iran which is not even a member party of CEDAW, have reformed their national laws to eliminate discrimination against women, thus aligning more closely with CEDAW’s requirements. However, there are still concerns regarding the scope and the applicability of these social and legal reforms. Recent social backlash against affirmative action favoring women’s rights, freedom of homosexuality, and same-sex marriage in Western societies highlight the challenges in this regard. International legal documents should not underestimate the significance of social and cultural norms of societies, as radical individualism or libertinism can lead to serious issues such as civil disobedience and increased crime rates. There is thus a need for reforms in the provisions of CEDAW in order to meet the diverse needs and requirements of the global community.
Conclusion
Having provided a brief overview of fundamental concepts related to gender equality, the present inquiry tested the hypothesis and examined the main shortcomings of CEDAW by delving into their nature and underlying causes. The analysis focused on the points of contention between the provisions of CEDAW and the positive laws in Iran, particularly in light of Islamic teachings. The analysis is crucial because the perspective of Shia leaders (esp. Imam Ali) on gender equality, which is significantly influenced by their communal concerns, has often been overlooked. Concerning the effectiveness of CEDAW, it is essential that interpreters or drafters of any alternative document consider different norms prevailing in the social context of member states, with particular attention to Sharia-based norms. Such an approach enhances the comprehensiveness of the document, enabling it to address different facets of gender discrimination in the member states
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Gender Discrimination
- Women’s Rights
- CEDAW
- Natural Rights
- Individualism
کتاب‌ها
- آشوری، محمد و همکاران، حقوق بشر و مفاهیم مساوات، انصاف و عدالت (تهران: خرسندی، 1394).
- جعفری لنگرودی، محمد جعفر، مبسوط در ترمینولوژی حقوق، جلد پنجم، چاپ هشتم (تهران: انتشارات گنج دانش، 1400).
- جوادی آملی، عبدالله، زن در آینه جلال و جمال (قم: مرکز نشر اسراء، 1375).
- دشتی، محمد، نهج البلاغه (ترجمه) (قم: پارسایان، 1379).
- صانعی، یوسف، منتخب الاحکام (قم: انتشارات میثم تمار، 1382).
- محقق داماد، سید مصطفی، بررسی فقهی حقوق خانواده: نکاح و انحلال آن (قم: مرکز نشر علوم اسلامی، 1397).
- مرعشی، سید محمد حسن، دیدگاه‌های نو در حقوق کیفری اسلام، جلد دوم (تهران: نشر میزان، 1379).
- مغنیه، محمد جواد، الفقه علی المذاهب الخمسه، ترجمه مصطفی جباری و حمید مسجد سرایی (تهران: بهینه، 1394).
- موحد، محمدعلی، در هوای حق و عدالت: از حقوق طبیعی تا حقوق بشر، چاپ 6 (تهران، نشر کارنامه، 1400).
مقاله‌ها
- ابوالفتحی، محمد، نوری، مختار، «جامعه‌گرایان و نقد فردگرایی و بی‌طرفی دولت لیبرال»، غرب‌شناسی بنیادی: پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی، دوره 3، شماره 2، (1391).
- حاجی ده‌آبادی، محمدعلی، «قاعده دفع افسد به فاسد و دلالت‌های حقوقی - جرم‌شناختی آن»، فقه و حقوق، دوره 5، شماره 18، (1387).
- رهبر، عباسعلی و ملک‌زاده، علی، «اصالت فرد در اندیشه سیاسی امام علی(ع)»، فصلنامه علوم سیاسی و روابط بین‌الملل، دوره 3، شماره 13، (1389).
- عباسی، عاطفه، «نقد و بررسی نابرابری دیه زن و مرد در نظام حقوقی جمهوری اسلامی ایران»، پژوهش‌نامه زنان: پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی، دوره 8، شماره 20، (1396).
- محمدی گیلانی، محمد، «شایستگی زنان برای عهده‌دار شدن قضاوت»، فصلنامه فقه اهل بیت، شماره 10، (1376).
- مهرپور، حسین، «سازوکارهای بین‌المللی و میزان بازدارندگی آنها در نقض حقوق بشر»، فصلنامه بین‌المللی روابط خارجی، دوره 1، شماره 4، (1388).
- موثقی، حسن، «بررسی تطبیقی مبانی فلسفی «حقوق» از منظر مکاتب حقوق بین‌الملل و جامعه‌شناسی»، مطالعات جامعه‌شناسی، دوره 11، شماره 40، (1397).
- موسوی، فضل الله و همکاران، «مطالعه تطبیقی اصول تفسیر قرارداد»، فصلنامه پژوهش حقوق خصوصی، دوره 1، شماره 1، (1391).
- میرداداشی، سید مهدی، «موجبات طلاق از منظر فقه شافعی و حنفی»، مطالعات فقهی و فلسفی، دوره 5، شماره 19، (1393).
- هدایت نیا، فرج الله، «قضاوت زن در پرتو احکام ثانویه»، مطالعات راهبردی زنان، شماره 32، (1385).
- یوسفیان، زهرا، «بررسی عرصه‌های حضور زنان در دوره حکومت امام علی (ع)»، نامه جامعه فصلنامه معارف اسلامی، دوره 2، شماره 116، (1394).
عربی
- حرعاملی ، محمدبن حسن، تفصیل وسائل الشیعة إلی تحصیل مسائل الشریعة (قم: مؤسسة آل البیت (ع) لاحیاء التراث، 1409ق).
References
Books
- Belaief, Gail, Spinoza's Philosophy of Law (The Hague: Mouton 1971).
- Croucher, Stephen M., et al., “Religion, Culture, and Communication” in J. Nussbaum (Ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication )Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).
- Gregory, Raymond F., Women and Workplace Discrimination: Overcoming Barriers to Gender Equality (London: Rutgers University Press, 2003).
- Kadelbach, Stefan, “State Immunity, Individual Compensation for Victims of Human Rights Crimes, and Future Prospects” in Valentina Volpe et. al. (eds), Remedies against Immunity? (Berlin: Springer, 2021).
- Krivenko, Ekaterina Yahyaoui, Women, Islam and International Law: Within the Context of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (Leiden: Brill, 2009).
- Miller, Ruth A., “The Turkish Republic” in Anver M. Emon, Rumee Ahmed (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).
- Nsude, Ifeyinva, Nwinaene, Vivian-Peace, and Oko, Blessing, “Impact of Online Behaviour on Gender Equity: Special Focus on Facebook and Blogs”, in Nkem Fab-Ukozor, Onyebuchi Chima Alexander (eds), Gender and National Development: Issues and Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2023).
- Pellet, Alain, “Reservations to Treaties and the Integrity of Human Rights”, in Scott Sheeran, Sir Nigel Rodley (eds), Routledge Handbook of International Human Rights Law (London: Routledge, 2013).
- Perry, John A., Perry, Erna K., Contemporary Society: An Introduction to Social Science (London: Routledge, 2016).
- Railton, Peter, Facts, Values, and Norms: Essays Toward a Morality of Consequence (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).
- Rana, Bandana, Perrie, Victoria, “CEDAW: A Tool for Addressing Violence against Women”, in Sarah S. Aneel, Uzma T. Haroon, and Imrana Niazi (eds), 70 Years of Development: The Way Forward (Islamabad: Sustainable Development Policy Institute, 2019).
- Salem, Nora, The Impact of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women on the Domestic Legislation in Egypt (Leiden: Brill, 2018).
- Soper, Philip, The Ethics of Deference: Learning from Law's Morals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).
- Tiefenbrun, Susan W., Women's International and Comparative Human Rights (Durham: Carlolina Academic Press, 2012).
- Tiong Min, Y., “The CISG as a Model for an International Contract Law”, in UNCITRAL-Singapore Seminar of 35 Years of the CISG: Achievements and Perspectives (Singapore: Singapore Management University, 2015).
- Wijaya, Hendri Yulius, “Conservative Islamic Forces, Global LGBT Rights,, and Anticipatory Homophobia in Indonesia”, in Marco Derks, Mariecke van den Berg (eds), Public Discourses About Homosexuality and Religion in Europe and Beyond (Switzerland: Springer, 2020).
Articles
- Australian Human Rights Commission, “Let's talk about equality and equity”, available at: https://humanrights. gov. au/ lets- talk- about-equality-and-equity. Accessed 10 August 2023.
- Atwater, Leanne E., et al., “Looking Ahead: How What We Know About Sexual Harassment Now Informs Us of the Future”, Organizational Dynamics, 48, No. 4, (2019).
- Centre for Women, Peace and Security, “CEDAW's Key Cases on Violence against Women”, available at: https:// blogs. lse. ac. uk/ vaw/int/cedaw/cedaws-key-cases/. Accessed 10 August 2023.
- Clark, R. Scott, “Sexual Liberation, Natural Law, and the Modern Resistance to Fixed Moral Norms”, (2010), available at: https://heidelblog.net/2010/08/sexual-liberation-natural-law/. Accessed 20 Ausgust 2023.
- Coleman, Jules L., “The Architecture of Jurisprudence”, The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 121, No. 1, (2011).
- Cullison, Alan D., “Morality and the Foundations of Legal Positivism”, Valparaiso University Law Review, Vol. 20, No. 1, (1985).
- Enworo, Oko Chima & Njemanze, Vivian Chizoma, “Acceptable Minimum Threshold of Universal Access to Social Services for Women in Nigeria: A Review of Selected Issues in the National Gender Policy”, Journal of International Women's Studies, 23, No. 1, (2022).
- Fischman, Joshua B., “Measuring Inconsistency, Indeterminacy, and Error in Adjudication”, American Law and Economics Review, 16, No. 1, (2014).
- Heunermund, Heather, Heberle, Manuela, “What are Cultural Norms?”, (2021), available at: https:// study. com/ learn/ lesson/ cultural-norms-definition-examples.html. Accessed 12 August 2023.
- Horowitz, Juliana Menasce, Igielnik, Ruth, “A Century After Women Gained the Right To Vote, Majority of Americans See Work To Do on Gender Equality”, (2020), available at: https:// pewresearch. org/social-trends/2020/07/07/a-century-after-women-gained-the-right-to-vote-majority-of-americans-see-work-to-do-on-gender-equality/. Accessed 9 August 2023.
- Human Rights Watch, “The Origins of the ‘Witchcraft’ Charge”, available at: https://www.hrw.org/reports/1997/saudi/Saudi-03.htm#. Accessed 12 Ausgust 2023.
- Intergovernmental Support, “World Conferences on Women”, available at: https:// www. unwomen. org/ en/ how-we-work/ intergovernmental-support/world-conferences-on-women#nairobi. Accessed 10 August 2023.
- Keller, Linda M., “The Impact of States Parties’ Reservations to the Convention on the elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women”, Michigan State Law Review, No. 2, (2014).
- Kapur, Roshni, “Women’s Rights under the Taliban in Afghanistan: The China Factor”, (2023), available at: https:// www. mei. edu/ publications/womens-rights-under-taliban-afghanistan-china-factor. Accessed 11 August 2023.
- Messner, Johannes, “Postwar Natural Law Revival and Its Outcome”, Natural Law Forume, No. 41, (1959).
- Office of the High Commissioner, “Gender Equality and Women’s Rights”, available at: https:// www. ohchr. org/ en/ topic/gender-equality-and-womens-rights? gclid= Cj0KCQjwoeem BhCfARIsADR2QCume_ UMlv36H3x6CANPY1H0cZ9qkZ-g_ JwcDTNWeD66rCrExQo0dMkaAkSpEALw_wcB. Accessed 11 Ausgut 2023.
- Office of the High Commissioner, “Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Wome”, (2023) available at: https://indicators.ohchr.org/. Accessed 15 August 2023.
- Office of the High Commissioner, “The Core International Human Rights Instruments and Their Monitoring Bodies”, available at: https:// www. ohchr.org/en/core-international-human-rights-instruments-and-their-monitoring-bodies. Accessed 10 August 2023.
- Office of the Historian, “The Kellogg-Briand Pact, 1928”, (2023), available at: https://history.state.gov/milestones/1921-1936/kellogg. Accessed 15 August 2023.
- Pietropaoli, Irene, “Islamic Reservations to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women”, The Journal of Human Rights, 14, No. 2, (2019).
- Piveteau, Charlotte, “Between Law and Values: Why Soft Law Reinforces the Hybrid Nature of International Human Rights Law”, (2020), available at: https://www.implications-philosophiques. org/ between-law-and-values-why-soft-law-reinforces-the-hybrid-nature-of-international-human-rights-law/. Accessed 15 Ausgust 2023.
- Sharma, Indira, “Violence Against Women: Where are the Solutions?”, Indian Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 57, No. 2, (2015).
- Schott, Christina, “Women's Rights in the Indonesian Province of Aceh”, (2014), available at: https://en.qantara.de/content/womens-rights-in-the-indonesian-province-of-aceh-the-population-is-being-systematically. Accessed 15 August 2023.
- Tuslian, Widya Naseva, “The Elimination of Culture Based Discrimination Against Women in Indonesia: An Assesment of the Implementation of State Parties’ Obligations Under Article 5(A) of the Women’s Conventions”, Indoneisa Law Review, 9, No. 1, (2019).
- The Economist, “America’s Far Right is Increasingly Protesting Against LGBT People”, (2023), available at: https:// economist. com/ graphic- detail/ 2023/ 01/13/ americas- far- right-is-increasingly-protesting-against-lgbt-people. Accessed 15 August 2023.
- Warsi, Zeba, Hastings, Dorothy, “Why Far-Right Groups are Increasingly Targeting the LGBTQ Community”, (2022), available at: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/why-far-right-groups-are-increasingly-targeting-the-lgbtq-community. Accessed 10 August 2023.
Documents
- Charter of the United Nations )24 October 1945(.
- Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, Fifty-second session, Concluding observations of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women: Indonesia, UN Doc CEDAW/C/IDN/CO/6-7, (27 July 2012).
- Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, Concluding Observations on the Combined Fourth and Fifth Periodic Reports of India, UN Doc CEDAW/C/IND/CO/4-5, (24 July 2014).
- Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, Concluding Comments of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women: Saudi Arabia, UN Doc CEDAW/C/SAU/CO/2, (8 April 2008).
- Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (18 December 1979) (CEDAW).
- Free Trade Agreement between the UK and Ukraine (signed 8 October 2020).
- General Assembly resolution endorsing the outcome of the World Conference of the International Women's Year : A/RES/3520 (XXX), 15 December 1975.
- International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (16 December 1966).
- International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (16 December 1966).
- Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act (28 October 2009).
- North American Free Trade Agreement between Canada, The United States and Mexico (NAFTA) (signed 17 December 1992).
- Report of the Committe on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, U.N. Doc. A/53/38/Rev.1; GAOR, 53d Sess., Supp. No. 38 (1998).
- Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review: Saudi Arabia, Human Rights Council, Twenty-fifth session, UN Doc A/HRC/25/3, (26 December 2013).
- Resolution adopted by the General Assembly, Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, UN Doc A/RES/54/4, (15 October 1999).
- The Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam (1990).
- Treaty Establishing European Economic Community (Treaty of Rome) (1957).
- UN General Assembly, Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, A/RES/70/1, 21 October 2015.
- United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (1980) (CISG).
- Universal Declaration of Human Rights (10 December 1948).
)