نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دکتری حقوق بینالملل دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران
2 دکتری حقوق بین الملل پردیس فارابی دانشگاه تهران، ، قم، ایران
چکیده
چکیده
دیوان بینالمللی دادگستری مطابق با ماده 41 اساسنامه خود به منظور حفظ حقوق طرفین دعوی تا زمان صدور رأی نهایی دستور موقت یا همان اقدامات موقتی صادر میکند. این مرجع در تفسیر ماده 41 شروطی را برای صدور اقدامات موقتی در رویه خود توسعه داده است. شرط احتمال توفیق دعوی شرط ششم صدور اقدامات موقتی است که اخیراً در رویه دیوان به شروط صدور اقدامات موقتی اضافه شده است. این نوشتار نقش شرط احتمال توفیق دعوی در حمایت از حقوق بینالملل بشر را از رهگذر بررسی تحولات این شرط در رویه دیوان بینالمللی دادگستری و دیدگاه نویسندگان حقوقی مورد ارزیابی قرار میدهد. نتایج بررسی ما نشان میدهد اعمال بیضابطه این شرط و پیشداوری دیوان راجع به ماهیت دعاوی طرفین در این مرحله رسیدگی، شفافیت و پیشبینیپذیری آیین حاکم بر صدور اقدامات موقتی را خدشهدار میکند و جایگاه اقدامات موقتی را بعنوان یکی از مهمترین ساز و کارهای حقوقی برای پیشگیری از نقض حقوق بینالملل تضعیف مینماید.
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
Plausibility of Claims in Provisional Measures Adopted by ICJ
نویسندگان [English]
- Alireza Ebrahimgol 1
- Hasan Khosroshahi 2
1 Ph.D, International Law, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
2 Ph.D, International Law, Farabi Campus, University of Tehran, Qom, Iran
چکیده [English]
The International Court of Justice is empowered, under Article 41 of its Statute, to order provisional or interim measures of protection to preserve the respective rights of the party-states pending final judgment on the merits. Through interpreting Article 41, the Court has developed in its case-law certain requirements for granting requested interim measures. The plausibility of claims is the sixth requirement recently added to the said requirements. The present research assesses the role of plausibility requirement in preservation of international human rights in light of evolution of this requirement in the court’s case law as well as the existing legal doctrine. The study indicates that an inconsistent approach to satisfaction of the plausibility requirement and prejudgment of the substance of the case could harm the transparency and predictability of the procedure governing provisional measures, and undermine such measures as one of the most effective legal mechanisms in preventing the breach of international law.
کلیدواژهها [English]
- Provisional measures
- plausibility of rights requirement
- international court of justice
- breach of international human rights and international humanitarian law
- merits
- ابهری، حمید و رضا، زارعی، «ویژگیها و شرایط شکلی درخواست دستور موقت در آیین دادرسی مدنی ایران»، فصلنامه حقوق، مجله دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دوره 40، شماره 101، (1389).
- داشاب، مهریار، «دستور موقت و ضمانت اجرای آن در رویه قضایی دیوان اروپایی حقوق بشر»، پژوهش حقوق عمومی، سال بیست و یکم، شماره 64، (1398).
- سلیمانزاده، احمدرضا و کوشا، هستی، «بررسی دستور موقت و ضمانت اجرای آن در دیوان بینالملل دادگستری»، فصلنامه مطالعات بینالمللی، دوره 13، شماره 1، (1395).
- شمس، عبدالله، «موارد صدور دستور موقت و عوامل مؤثر در تشخیص آن»، مجله تحقیقات حقوقی، شماره 39، (1383).
- محبی، محسن و بذّار، وحید، «اقدامات تأمینی (دستور موقت) دیوان بینالمللی دادگستری: الزام یا توصیه؟ نگاهی دوباره رأی دیوان بینالمللی دادگستری در قضیه برادران لاگراند»، فصلنامه قضاوت، شماره 95، (1397).
- میرعباسی، سید باقر و فامیل زوار جلالی، امیر، «صلاحیت دیوان بینالمللی در صدور قرار موقت با نگاه موردی بر قضیه اوکراین علیه فدراسیون روسیه سال 2017»، فصلنامه مطالعات حقوق عمومی، دوره 50، شماره 4، (1399).
- وثوقی کردکندی، بهرام و میرزایی، زهرا، «واکاوی ابعاد حقوقی دستور موقت»، فصلنامه حقوق ملل، سال پنجم، شماره 18، (1394).
References
Books
- Condé, Victor H., A Handbook of International Human Rights Terminology, Second Edition )Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press, 2004).
- Dumbauld, Edward, Interim Measures of Protection in International Controversies (Netherland: Martinus Nijhoff, 1932).
- Cameron, Miles, Provisional Measures before International Courts and Tribunals (Cambridge, Cambrigdge University Press, 2017).
- Klein, Natalie, “Provisional Measures and Provisional Arrangements”, in A. Oude Elferink, T. Henriksen, & S. Busch (Eds.), Maritime Boundary Delimitation: The Case Law: Is It Consistent and Predictable? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018).
- Rosenne Shabtai, Provisional Measures in International Law: The International Court of Justice and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).
- Schabas, William A., The European Convention on Human Rights A Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).
- Oellers-Frahm, Karin, “Article 41”, In Andreas Zimmermann, Karin Oellers-Frahm, Christian Tomuschat, and Christian J. Tams (eds.), The Statute of the International Court of Justice a Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).
- Thirlway, Hugh, the International Court of Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).
Articles
- Abhari, Hamid & Zareyi, Reza, “The Features and Conditions for Requesting of Temporary Order in The Civil Procedure of Iran”, Private Law Studies Quarterly, Volume 40, Issue 101, (2011). [In Persian]
- Becker A, Michael, “The Plight of the Rohingya: Genocide Allegations and Provisional Measures in the Gambia v Myanmar at the International Court of Justice”, Melbourne Journal of International Law, Vol. 15, (2020).
- Cogan, Jacob Katz, “Current Developments, the 2011 Judicial Activity of the International Court of Justice, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 106, No. 3, (2012).
- Dashab, Mehryar, “Interim Measure and Its Enforcement in the European Court of Human Rights Case-law”, Public Law Research, 21, Issue. 64, (2020). [In Persian]
- Keller, Helen & Marti, Cedric, “Interim Relief Compared: Use of Interim Measures by the UN Human Rights Committee and the European Court of Human Rights”, Heidelberg Journal of International Law [ZaöRV], 73, (2013).
- Kolb, Robert, “Digging Deeper into the “Plausibility of Rights”-Criterion in the Provisional Measures Jurisprudence of the ICJ”, In the Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals, Brill- Nijhoff, 19, 3, (2020).
- Lando, Massimo, “Plausibility in the Provisional Measures Jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice”, Leiden Journal of International Law, Volume. 31, Issue. 3, (2018).
- Miles, Cameron, “The Origins of the Law of Provisional Measures before International Courts and Tribunals”, Heidelberg Journal of International Law, (ZaöRV), 73, (2013).
- Miles, Cameron, “Provisional Measures and the ‘New’ Plausibility in the Jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice”, British Yearbook of International Law, bry011, (2018).
- Miles, Cameron, “Plausibility and the ICJ: a response to Somos and Sparks”, Völkerrechtsblog, (2018), https:// voelkerrechtsblog. org/ de/ plausibility- and-the-icj/, last accessed on 2021.06.13.
- Mirabasi, Seyed Bagher & Famil Zavvar Jalali, Amir, “The Jurisdiction of the ICJ on Indication of Provisional Measures: An Emphasis on Ukraine v. Russian Federation 2017”, Public Law Studies Quartely, 50, Issue 4, (2021). [In Persian]
- Mohebbi, Mohsen & Bazzar, Vahid, “Provisional Measures (Interim Order) of the International Court of Justice: Binding or Recommendation? A new look at the International Court of Justice's Ruling on the Case of the LaGrand Brothers”, Judgment Journal, Volume. 18, Issue 95, (2018). [In Persian]
- Sparks, Tom & Somos, Mark, “The Humanization of Provisional Measures?”, MPIL Research Paper Series, No. 20, (2019).
- Shamss, Abdollah, “Requirements for Issuance of Interim Mesures [under Iranian Law]”, Legal Research Quartely, 7, Issue 39, (2004). [In Persian]
- Soleymanzade, Ahmadreza & Koosha, Hast, “A Review on the Provisional Measures and Sanctions in the International Court of Justice”, International Studies Journal, Volume. 13, Issue 1, (2016). [In Persian]
- Rüdiger Wolfrum, “Interim (Provisional) Measures of Protection”, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Web Edition, (August 2006), https:// opil. ouplaw. com/ view/ 10.1093/ law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e32, last accessed on 2021.06.13.
- Tanaka, Yoshifumi, “A New Phase of the Temple of Preah Vihear Dispute before the International Court of Justice: Reflections on the Indication of Provisional Measures of 18 July 2011”, Chinese Journal of International Law, No. 11, (2012).
- Tanaka, Yoshifumi, “Unilateral Exploration and Exploitation of Natural Resources in Disputed Areas: A Note on the Ghana/Côte d'Ivoire order of 25 April 2015 before the Special Chamber of ITLOS”, Ocean Development & International Law, Volume. 46, (2015).
- Tanaka, Yoshifumi, “The Impacts of the Tribunal’s Jurisprudence on the Development of International Law”, In: The Contribution of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea to the Rule of Law: 1996-2016, (Netherland: Brill /Nijhoff, 2018).
- Vosoughi Korbekandi, Bahram & Mirzaei, Zahra, “A Legal Critique of Interim Measures”, Nation’s Law Journal, Volume 5, issue 18 (2015). [In Persian]
Cases
- PCIJ, Case Concerning the Polish Agrarian Reform and the German Minority, Order Of July 29th, 1933, Dissenting Opinion by M. Anzilotti, at https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/permanent-court-of internationaljustice/serie_AB/AB_58/02_Reforme_agraire_polonaise_Ordonn nce_19330729_Opinion_Anzilotti.pdf, last visited on 2021.04.14.
- ICJ, Questions Relating to the Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite (Belgium V. Senegal), Order of 28 May 2009, at https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/144/144-20090528-ORD-01-00-EN.pdf, last visted on 2021.06.24.
- ICJ, Case Concerning Passage through the Great Belt (Finland V. Denmark), Order Of 29 July 1991, Separate Opinion of Judge Shahabuddeen, p.21, at https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/ 86/086-19910729-ORD-01-03-EN.pdf, last visited on 2021.06.14.
- ICJ, Certain Activities Carried Out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua), Provisional Measures, Order of 8 March 2011, I.C.J. Reports 2011, at https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/150/150-20110308-ORD-01-00-EN.pdf last visited on 2021.06.14.
- The Temple of Preah Vihear case, Provisional Measures, Request for Inidication of Provsisional Peasures, Order of the Court dated 18 July 2011, at https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/151/151-20110718-ORD-01-00-EN.pdf, last visited on 25 November 2021.
- ICJ, Certain Activities Carried Out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua), Separate Opinion of Judge Koroma annexed to the order of 8 March 2011, I.C.J. Reports 2011, at https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/150/150-20110308-ORD-01-01-EN.pdf, last visited on 2021.06.14.
- ICJ, Certain Activities Carried Out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua), Separate Opinion of Judge Sepúlveda-Amor annexed to the order of 8 March 2011, I.C.J. Reports 2011, P.38, para. 15, at https:// www. icj- cij. org/ public/ files/ case- related/ 150/150-20110308-ORD-01-02-EN.pdf, last visited on 2021.06.14.
- Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. Uruguay), Provisional Measures, Separate Opinion of Judge Abraham annexed to the order of 13 July 2006, I.C.J. Reports 2006, at https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/135/135-20060713-ORD-01-02-EN.pdf, last visited on 2021.06.14.
- ICJ, Questions relating to the Seizure and Detention of Certain Documents and Data (Timor‑Leste v. Australia), Provisional Measures, Order of 3 March 2014, I.C.J. Reports 2014, at https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case related/156/156-20140303-ORD-01-00-EN.pdf, last visited on 2021.06.14.
- ICJ, Immunities and Criminal Proceedings (Equatorial Guinea v. France), Request for Indication of Provisional Measures, Order of the Court dated 7 December 2016, at https://www.icj-cij. org/ public/ files/ case-related/163/163-20161207-ORD-01-00-EN.pdf, last visited on 2021.06.21.
- ICJ, Application of the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism and of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Ukraine V. Russian Federation), Order of 19 April 2017, at https://www.icj-cij. org/ public/ files/case-related/166/166-20170419-ORD-01-00-EN.pdf, last visited on 2021.06.14.
- ICJ, Application of the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism and of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Ukraine V. Russian Federation), Separate Opinion of Judge Owada, annexed to the Order of the Court dated 19 April 2017,para.14, at https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/166/166-20170419-ORD-01-01-EN.pdf, last visited on 2021.06.14.
- ICJ, Application of the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism and of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Ukraine V. Russian Federation), Separate Opinion of Judge Cançado Trindade, annexed to the Order of the Court dated 19 April 2017, paras. 37 and 41, at https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/166/166-20170419-ORD-01-03-EN.pdf, last visited on 2021.06.14.
- ICJ, Application of the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism and of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Ukraine V. Russian Federation), Separate Opinion of Separate Opinion of Judge Bhandari, annexed to the Order of the Court dated 19 April 2017, 16, at https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/166/166-20170419-ORD-01-04-EN.pdf, last visited on 2021.06.14.
- ICJ, Application of the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism and of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Ukraine V. Russian Federation), Separate Opinion of Judge Ad Hoc Pocar, annexed to the Order of the Court dated 19 April 2017, 2-4, at https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/166/166-20170419-ORD-01-06-EN.pdf, last visited on 2021.06.14.
- ICJ, Alleged Violations Of the 1955 Treaty of Amity, Economic Relations, and Consular Rights (Islamic Republic Of Iran v United States Of America), Request for the Indication Of Provisional Measures, order of the Court dated 3 October 2018, at https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/175/175-20181003-ORD-01-00-EN.pdf, last visited on 2021.06.14.
- Alleged Violations Of the 1955 Treaty of Amity, Economic Relations, and Consular Rights (Islamic Republic Of Iran v United States Of America), Request For The Indication Of Provisional Measures, order of the Court dated 3 October 2018, Separate Opinion of Judge CANÇADO TRINDADE, para. 73, at https://www.icj-cij. org/ public/ files/case-related/175/175-20181003-ORD-01-01-EN.pdf, last visited on 2021.06.14.
- ICJ, Application of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Qatar V. United Arab Emirates), provisional measures, order of the Court dated 28 July 2018, at https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/172/172-20180723-ORD-01-00-EN.pdf, last visited on 2021.06.14.
- ICJ, Application of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Qatar V. United Arab Emirates), provisional measures, order of the Court dated 28 July 2018, Separate Opinion of Judge Cançado Trindade, para. 57, at https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/172/172-20180723-ORD-01-02-EN.pdf, last visited on 2021.06.14.
- ICJ, Application of The International Convention on the Eliminationv of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Qatar V. United Arab Emirates), ICJ, Joint Declaration of Judges Tomka, Gaja and Gevorgian annexed to the order of the Court dated 28 July 2018, paras. 3-7, https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/172/172-20180723-ORD-01-01-EN.pdf, last visited on 2021.06.14.
- ICJ, Jadhav Case (India V. Pakistan), Request for Indication of Provisional Measures, Order of the Court dated 18 May 2017, at https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/168/168-20170518-ORD-01-00-EN.pdf, last visited on 2021.06.14.
- ICJ, Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (The Gambia V. Myanmar) Request for the Indication of Provisional Measures, Order of 23 January 2020, at https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/178/178-20200123-ORD-01-00-EN.pdf, last visited on 2021.11.22.
- ICJ, Application of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Armenia V. Azerbaijan), Request for Indication of Provisional Measures, Order of 7 December 2022, at https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/180/180-20211207-ORD-01-00-EN.pdf, last visited on 2022.02.12.
- Application of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Armenia V. Azerbaijan), Request for Indication of Provisional Measures, Order of 7 December 2022, Dissenting opinion of Judge Yusuf, at https://www.icj-cij. org/ public/ files/ case-related/180/180-20211207-ORD-01-01-EN.pdf, last visited on 2022.02.12.
Other Research Materials
Center for Justice and International Law (CEJIL) and International Human Rights Law Clinic, Comparative Analysis of the Practice of Precautionary Measures among International Human Rights Bodies, December 2012.